Effect of 100% Orange Juice and a Volume-Matched Sugar-Sweetened Drink on Subjective Appetite, Food Intake, and Glycemic Response in Adults.

Stephanie Robayo, Michaela Kucab, Sarah E Walker, Katherine Suitor, Katherine D'Aversa, Olivia Morello, Nick Bellissimo
Author Information
  1. Stephanie Robayo: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  2. Michaela Kucab: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  3. Sarah E Walker: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  4. Katherine Suitor: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  5. Katherine D'Aversa: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  6. Olivia Morello: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
  7. Nick Bellissimo: School of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.

Abstract

Dietary recommendations to reduce the consumption of free sugars often group 100% fruit juice with other sugar-containing beverages. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of consuming 100% orange juice compared to an orange drink on next-meal food intake (FI), glycemic response, average appetite, emotions, and sensory characteristics in normal-weight adults. Thirty-six normal-weight adults (age: 26.8 ± 0.9 years) consumed, in random order and at least 5 days apart, three 240 mL test beverages as follows: (a) 100% orange juice, (b) orange drink, or (c) water. Subjective sweetness and pleasantness were determined immediately after test beverage consumption. Glycemic response, average appetite, and subjective emotions were measured every 15 min for 60 min. Food intake was determined at a pizza lunch 60 min later. Rest-of-day glycemic response and energy intake (EI) were determined using a continuous glucose monitor and food record, respectively. Lunch FI ( = 0.054) and total EI ( = 0.01) were both lower after 100% orange juice compared with the orange drink. Caloric compensation was 84% after 100% orange juice and -25% after the orange drink ( = 0.047). Average appetite was not significantly different between the test beverages ( > 0.05). Blood glucose iAUC adjusted for available carbohydrate was lower after 100% orange juice compared with the orange drink ( < 0.001). Rest-of-day blood glucose concentrations were lower after 100% orange juice compared with the orange drink ( = 0.03) and water control ( < 0.001). In conclusion, consumption of 100% orange juice as a preload resulted in higher caloric compensation, lower total daily EI, and lower blood glucose concentrations compared to the orange drink.

Keywords

References

  1. Physiol Behav. 1988;43(5):547-52 [PMID: 3200909]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1641-1646 [PMID: 34099515]
  3. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2449-2467 [PMID: 33150530]
  4. Pediatr Res. 2007 Jun;61(6):745-9 [PMID: 17426650]
  5. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(6):428-433 [PMID: 29923775]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):529-42 [PMID: 16522898]
  7. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):859-73 [PMID: 19246357]
  8. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 1;169(7):893-900 [PMID: 19224977]
  9. Nutrients. 2018 Mar 23;10(4): [PMID: 29570607]
  10. J Am Coll Nutr. 2018 Nov-Dec;37(8):659-669 [PMID: 29702032]
  11. Neurol Res Int. 2015;2015:606479 [PMID: 25653876]
  12. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010 Dec;54(12):1773-80 [PMID: 20564476]
  13. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(5-6):985-95 [PMID: 16289850]
  14. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81 [PMID: 21681120]
  15. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(2):203-12 [PMID: 6764938]
  16. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 03;12(7): [PMID: 32635195]
  17. Adv Nutr. 2015 Mar 13;6(2):236S-243S [PMID: 25770266]
  18. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Mar;91(3):837-42 [PMID: 16368744]
  19. Nutr Rev. 2019 Nov 1;77(11):829-843 [PMID: 31504822]
  20. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e93471 [PMID: 24682091]
  21. Nutr J. 2012 Dec 12;11:107 [PMID: 23234248]
  22. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 Sep;44(9):1012-1019 [PMID: 30844296]
  23. Food Funct. 2021 Nov 15;12(22):11469-11481 [PMID: 34698750]
  24. Health Psychol. 1991;10(2):133-42 [PMID: 2055211]
  25. Physiol Behav. 1990 Jul;48(1):19-26 [PMID: 2236270]
  26. Addict Behav. 1990;15(2):147-52 [PMID: 2343788]
  27. Appetite. 2005 Apr;44(2):187-93 [PMID: 15808893]
  28. Physiol Behav. 1989 Jun;45(6):1093-9 [PMID: 2813533]
  29. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;68(7):773-7 [PMID: 24667751]
  30. Br J Nutr. 2019 Apr;121(7):782-792 [PMID: 30670104]
  31. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Dec;114(12 Suppl):S8-S26 [PMID: 25458994]
  32. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jan 2;57(1):129-140 [PMID: 25831042]
  33. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S102-38 [PMID: 24222017]
  34. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Nov;76(5):1023-30 [PMID: 12399274]
  35. J Nutr. 2012 Jun;142(6):1149S-54S [PMID: 22573779]
  36. Appetite. 2001 Dec;37(3):185-95 [PMID: 11895319]
  37. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;117(4):741-765 [PMID: 36842451]
  38. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2000 Jan;51(1):59-71 [PMID: 10746106]
  39. Nutr J. 2019 Oct 18;18(1):60 [PMID: 31627756]
  40. Nutrients. 2021 May 27;13(6): [PMID: 34071760]
  41. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Apr;18(4):205-218 [PMID: 35064240]
  42. Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):106-10 [PMID: 26005598]
  43. Lancet. 1986 May 10;1(8489):1092-3 [PMID: 2871354]
  44. Nutrients. 2019 May 02;11(5): [PMID: 31052523]
  45. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Nov;54(5):846-54 [PMID: 1951155]
  46. Appetite. 1986 Dec;7(4):323-31 [PMID: 3789709]
  47. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Jun;11 Suppl 1:S11-6 [PMID: 19469670]
  48. Appetite. 2014 Dec;83:256-262 [PMID: 25150911]
  49. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Dec;15(12):2974-83 [PMID: 18198306]
  50. Br J Nutr. 2010 Apr;103(8):1094-7 [PMID: 19930765]
  51. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193109 [PMID: 31099854]
  52. Pediatrics. 1999 Mar;103(3):E26 [PMID: 10049982]
  53. Nutrients. 2019 Jan 26;11(2): [PMID: 30691085]
  54. Front Nutr. 2020 May 13;7:63 [PMID: 32478089]
  55. Physiol Behav. 2003 Sep;79(4-5):767-73 [PMID: 12954421]
  56. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 May;53(5):1159-64 [PMID: 2021127]
  57. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Dec;94(12):2399-2414 [PMID: 31806098]

Grants

  1. n/a/Florida Department of Citrus

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
Sugars
Citrus sinensis
Fruit and Vegetable Juices
Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Appetite
Blood Glucose
Lunch
Water
Eating

Chemicals

Sugars
Blood Glucose
Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0orange100%juice0drinkcomparedglucoselowerbeveragesintakeresponseappetite=consumptionfoodglycemicnormal-weightadultstestdeterminedminEIbloodsugarsFIaverageemotionswaterSubjectiveGlycemic60FoodRest-of-daytotalcompensation<001concentrationsDietaryrecommendationsreducefreeoftengroupfruitsugar-containingobjectivestudydetermineeffectconsumingnext-mealsensorycharacteristicsThirty-sixage:268±9yearsconsumedrandomorderleast5daysapartthree240mLfollows:bcsweetnesspleasantnessimmediatelybeveragesubjectivemeasuredevery15pizzalunchlaterenergyusingcontinuousmonitorrecordrespectivelyLunch05401Caloric84%-25%047Averagesignificantlydifferent>05BloodiAUCadjustedavailablecarbohydrate03controlconclusionpreloadresultedhighercaloricdailyEffectOrangeJuiceVolume-MatchedSugar-SweetenedDrinkAppetiteIntakeResponseAdultssatietysugar-sweetened

Similar Articles

Cited By