Geospatial modelling of dry season habitats of the malaria vector, Anopheles funestus, in south-eastern Tanzania.

Najat F Kahamba, Fredros O Okumu, Mohammed Jumanne, Khamisi Kifungo, Joel O Odero, Francesco Baldini, Heather M Ferguson, Luca Nelli
Author Information
  1. Najat F Kahamba: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania. nkahamba@ihi.or.tz.
  2. Fredros O Okumu: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  3. Mohammed Jumanne: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  4. Khamisi Kifungo: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  5. Joel O Odero: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  6. Francesco Baldini: School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  7. Heather M Ferguson: Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P. O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
  8. Luca Nelli: School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. luca.nelli@glasgow.ac.uk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anopheles funestus is a major malaria vector in Eastern and Southern Africa and is currently the dominant malaria-transmitting vector in many parts of Tanzania. Previous research has identified its preference for specific aquatic habitats, especially those that persist in dry months. This observation suggests the potential for targeted control through precise habitat mapping and characterization. In this study, we investigated the influence of habitat characteristics, land cover and human population densities on An. funestus distribution during dry seasons. Based on the results, we developed a habitat suitability model for this vector species in south-eastern Tanzania.
METHODS: Eighteen villages in south-eastern Tanzania were surveyed during the dry season from September-December 2021. Water bodies were systematically inspected for mosquito larvae and characterized by their physico-chemical characteristics and surrounding environmental features. A generalized linear model was used to assess the presence of An. funestus larvae as a function of the physico-chemical characteristics, land use and human population densities. The results obtained from this model were used to generate spatially explicit predictions of habitat suitability in the study districts.
RESULTS: Of the 1466 aquatic habitats surveyed, 440 were positive for An. funestus, with river streams having the highest positivity (74%; n = 322) followed by ground pools (15%; n = 67). The final model had an 83% accuracy in predicting positive An. funestus habitats, with the most important characteristics being permanent waters, clear waters with or without vegetation or movement and shading over the habitats. There was also a positive association of An. funestus presence with forested areas and a negative association with built-up areas. Human population densities had no influence on An. funestus distribution.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underscore the crucial role of both the specific habitat characteristics and key environmental factors, notably land cover, in the distribution of An. funestus. In this study area, An. funestus predominantly inhabits river streams and ground pools, with a preference for clear, perennial waters with shading. The strong positive association with more pristine environments with tree covers and the negative association with built-up areas underscore the importance of ecological transitions in vector distribution and malaria transmission risk. Such spatially explicit predictions could enable more precise interventions, particularly larval source management, to accelerate malaria control.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Vet Entomol. 2000 Jun;14(2):171-80 [PMID: 10872861]
  2. Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jul 05;8:356 [PMID: 26142904]
  3. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81931 [PMID: 24312606]
  4. Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 28;11(1):4353 [PMID: 32859908]
  5. PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177807 [PMID: 28542335]
  6. Parasitol Res. 2021 Apr;120(4):1193-1202 [PMID: 33409645]
  7. Malar J. 2019 Dec 10;18(1):414 [PMID: 31823783]
  8. Basic Appl Ecol. 2018 Feb;26:101-110 [PMID: 34290566]
  9. Parasit Vectors. 2023 Nov 7;16(1):408 [PMID: 37936155]
  10. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13457 [PMID: 34188090]
  11. J Vector Borne Dis. 2007 Mar;44(1):44-51 [PMID: 17378216]
  12. Malar J. 2022 Jun 2;21(1):158 [PMID: 35655190]
  13. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 Jun;62(6):726-32 [PMID: 11304064]
  14. Rev Saude Publica. 1991 Jun;25(3):165-78 [PMID: 1687929]
  15. Malar J. 2008 Jul 03;7:119 [PMID: 18598355]
  16. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Dec;81(6):1079-84 [PMID: 19996440]
  17. Malar J. 2020 Nov 11;19(1):408 [PMID: 33176805]
  18. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Mar;31(2):247-256 [PMID: 34158776]
  19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Dec;61(6):1010-6 [PMID: 10674687]
  20. Parasit Vectors. 2011 Feb 28;4:25 [PMID: 21352608]
  21. Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jan 22;8:41 [PMID: 25608875]
  22. Bull Entomol Res. 1965 Dec;56(2):237-62 [PMID: 5854754]
  23. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0217414 [PMID: 31158255]
  24. Malar J. 2005 Jan 14;4:4 [PMID: 15649333]
  25. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Mar;76(3):450-60 [PMID: 17360867]
  26. PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 02;14(3):e1002380 [PMID: 26934361]
  27. J Vector Borne Dis. 2012 Jun;49(2):61-71 [PMID: 22898476]
  28. Malar J. 2011 Dec 13;10:353 [PMID: 22166144]
  29. Malar J. 2018 Oct 16;17(1):362 [PMID: 30326881]
  30. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:371-91 [PMID: 10761582]
  31. Malar J. 2020 Jun 23;19(1):219 [PMID: 32576200]
  32. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0255321 [PMID: 34634069]
  33. J Med Entomol. 2001 Mar;38(2):282-8 [PMID: 11296836]
  34. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11810 [PMID: 34083582]
  35. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2022 Aug 03;18:e00264 [PMID: 35959316]
  36. Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jun 09;7:265 [PMID: 24912923]
  37. PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 03;7(8):e1000303 [PMID: 20689800]
  38. Parasit Vectors. 2017 Jan 14;10(1):29 [PMID: 28088225]

MeSH Term

Humans
Animals
Seasons
Malaria
Anopheles
Tanzania
Mosquito Vectors
Ecosystem
Rivers
Larva

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0funestushabitatvectorTanzaniahabitatscharacteristicsdistributionmalariadrystudymodelpositiveassociationlandcoverpopulationdensitiesresultssuitabilitysouth-easternwatersareasAnophelespreferencespecificaquaticcontrolprecisemappingcharacterizationinfluencehumansurveyedseasonlarvaephysico-chemicalenvironmentalusedpresencespatiallyexplicitpredictionsriverstreamsgroundpoolsclearshadingnegativebuilt-upunderscorefactorsHabitatBACKGROUND:majorEasternSouthernAfricacurrentlydominantmalaria-transmittingmanypartsPreviousresearchidentifiedespeciallypersistmonthsobservationsuggestspotentialtargetedinvestigatedseasonsBaseddevelopedspeciesMETHODS:EighteenvillagesSeptember-December2021WaterbodiessystematicallyinspectedmosquitocharacterizedsurroundingfeaturesgeneralizedlinearassessfunctionuseobtainedgeneratedistrictsRESULTS:1466440highestpositivity74%n = 322followed15%n = 67final83%accuracypredictingimportantpermanentwithoutvegetationmovementalsoforestedHumanCONCLUSIONS:crucialrolekeynotablyareapredominantlyinhabitsperennialstrongpristineenvironmentstreecoversimportanceecologicaltransitionstransmissionriskenableinterventionsparticularlylarvalsourcemanagementaccelerateGeospatialmodellingAquaticEnvironmentalLandanalysisLarvalecologyMosquitoSoutheastern

Similar Articles

Cited By