Effect of preheating nano-hybrid and bulk-fill composites with warm airstream on their microtensile bond strength to dentin.

Alireza Boruziniat, Farzaneh Khosravi, Arsalan Shahri, Mahdi Saeedi
Author Information
  1. Alireza Boruziniat: Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad, Iran.
  2. Farzaneh Khosravi: Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Mashhad, Iran.
  3. Arsalan Shahri: Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad, Iran.
  4. Mahdi Saeedi: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Aims: This study assessed the effect of preheating nano-hybrid and bulk-fill composites with warm airstream on their microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to dentin.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, dentin was exposed in 42 extracted premolars that were assigned to two groups ( = 21) for bonding to EverX Posterior bulk-fill and Grandio nano-hybrid posterior composite. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups for preheating of composite to 50��C by a commercial composite warmer (Subgroup 1), a warm airstream by a hair dryer for 10 s (Subgroup 2), and no heating (room temperature; Subgroup 3). Composite cylinders with a 4-mm height were bonded to the tooth surface with a 5-generation bonding agent using the incremental technique and cured (each increment for 30 s). The MTBS to dentin was measured, and the bonding interface was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and independent t-test (�� =0.05).
Results: In both composite groups, the mean MTBS of the warm airstream subgroup was significantly higher than that of warmer ( < 0.001) and control ( < 0.001) subgroups. The mean MTBS of the warmer subgroup was significantly lower than that of control subgroup ( = 0.01). The MTBS of the EverX composite was significantly higher than that of the Grandio composite only in the warmer group ( < 0.05). Adhesive failure occurred more frequently in all groups with the highest frequency in airstream subgroup of both composite types.
Conclusion: Preheating with a warm airstream significantly increased the MTBS of both composite types to dentin.

Keywords

References

  1. Biomaterials. 2002 Apr;23(8):1819-29 [PMID: 11950052]
  2. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Jul 01;7(3):12-21 [PMID: 16820803]
  3. J Conserv Dent. 2008 Jul;11(3):99-107 [PMID: 20142895]
  4. Dent Mater. 2010 Jan;26(1):59-66 [PMID: 19837452]
  5. Oper Dent. 2020 Jul 1;45(4):387-395 [PMID: 31794345]
  6. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Winter;11(1):36-42 [PMID: 28413594]
  7. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;25(1):88-92 [PMID: 35722076]
  8. J Dent Res. 2002 Feb;81(2):114-8 [PMID: 11827255]
  9. Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):908-14 [PMID: 20557926]
  10. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):515-26 [PMID: 16171856]
  11. J Dent. 2006 Jan;34(1):26-34 [PMID: 15907359]
  12. Scanning. 2016 Jan-Feb;38(1):63-9 [PMID: 26381904]
  13. J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):207-211 [PMID: 37205885]
  14. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):191-5 [PMID: 21814365]
  15. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Sep;11(5):569-75 [PMID: 25628684]
  16. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4225-4235 [PMID: 33083851]
  17. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(6):340-50; discussion 351 [PMID: 17083439]
  18. Dent Mater. 2019 Feb;35(2):217-228 [PMID: 30503020]
  19. J Dent. 2015 Nov;43(11):1358-64 [PMID: 26232610]
  20. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006 Mar 01;11(2):E215-20 [PMID: 16505805]
  21. J Prosthodont. 1994 Sep;3(3):126-9 [PMID: 7874252]
  22. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jul 01;12(7):e682-e687 [PMID: 32905021]
  23. Dent Mater. 2021 Mar;37(3):413-422 [PMID: 33353736]
  24. J Dent Res. 2005 Jul;84(7):663-7 [PMID: 15972598]
  25. J Dent Res. 2006 Jan;85(1):38-43 [PMID: 16373678]
  26. J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):36-41 [PMID: 33223639]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0compositeairstreamMTBSwarmdentinpreheatingwarmersubgroupsignificantly0nano-hybridbulk-fillgroupsbondingEverXGrandioSubgroup<studycompositesmicrotensilebondstrength=PosteriorgroupsubgroupssCompositeusing05meanhigher001controltypesAims:assessedeffectMaterialsMethods:vitroexposed42extractedpremolarsassignedtwo21posteriorsubdividedthree50��Ccommercial1hairdryer102heatingroomtemperature3cylinders4-mmheightbondedtoothsurface5-generationagentincrementaltechniquecuredincrement30measuredinterfaceevaluatedstereomicroscopescanningelectronmicroscopeSEMDataanalyzedone-waytwo-wayANOVATukey'stestindependentt-test��=0Results:lower01AdhesivefailureoccurredfrequentlyhighestfrequencyConclusion:PreheatingincreasedEffectresins

Similar Articles

Cited By