VEGF Inhibition Associates With Decreased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Benjamin Sommer Thinggaard, Katrine Frederiksen, Yousif Subhi, Sören Möller, Torben Lykke Sørensen, Ryo Kawasaki, Jakob Grauslund, Lonny Stokholm
Author Information
  1. Benjamin Sommer Thinggaard: Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  2. Katrine Frederiksen: Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  3. Yousif Subhi: Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  4. Sören Möller: Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  5. Torben Lykke Sørensen: Department of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  6. Ryo Kawasaki: Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  7. Jakob Grauslund: Department of Ophthalmology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  8. Lonny Stokholm: Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Abstract

Purpose: Controversy exists regarding the systemic safety of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We aimed to investigate the potential impact of VEGF inhibitor treatment on the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with nAMD.
Design: A nationwide register-based cohort study with 16 years follow-up.
Participants: patients with nAMD exposed with VEGF inhibitors (n = 37 733) and unexposed individuals without nAMD (n = 1 897 073) aged ≥ 65 years residing in Denmark between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2022.
Methods: Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to assess the effect of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor treatment on all-cause mortality and incident CVD.
Main Outcome Measures: In a predefined analysis plan we defined primary outcomes as hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality and a composite CVD endpoint in patients with nAMD treated with VEGF inhibitors compared with individuals without nAMD. The secondary outcomes encompassed analyses that explored the impact of the number of doses and the association between exposure and outcome over a specific time period.
Results: Overall, 63.7% of patients with nAMD were women with an average age of 69.9 years (interquartile range 65.0-76.0 years). patients exposed to VEGF inhibitors demonstrated a reduced risk of all-cause mortality compared with individuals without nAMD (HR, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.81), and an increased risk of composite CVD (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07). The decreased risk of all-cause mortality persisted, but there was no significant association between VEGF inhibitor treatment and CVD when patients with nAMD were grouped by the number of doses or considered exposed within 60 days postinjection.
Conclusions: Our study revealed a decreased risk of all-cause mortality and a 4% increased risk of CVD among patients with nAMD exposed with VEGF inhibitors. The decreased risk of mortality is unlikely to be directly pathophysiologically related to VEGF inhibitor treatment. Instead, we speculate that patients undergoing VEGF inhibitor treatment are, on average, individuals in good health with adequate personal resources. Therefore, they also have a higher likelihood of overall survival. These findings strongly support the safety of VEGF inhibitor treatment in terms of all-cause mortality and CVD among patients with nAMD.
Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Keywords

References

  1. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Feb;29(2):120-126 [PMID: 30029848]
  2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;98(12):1636-41 [PMID: 25001321]
  3. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 1;138(1):50-57 [PMID: 31750861]
  4. Scand J Public Health. 2016 Jul;44(5):462-79 [PMID: 27098981]
  5. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 May;6(5):369-376 [PMID: 34974177]
  6. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):798-798f [PMID: 27789670]
  7. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):483-490 [PMID: 30703203]
  8. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;70(6):2065-2070 [PMID: 35647983]
  9. J Clin Med. 2020 May 18;9(5): [PMID: 32443612]
  10. Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48 [PMID: 23084240]
  11. Pharmaceutics. 2019 Jul 31;11(8): [PMID: 31370346]
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD011230 [PMID: 25220133]
  13. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):294 [PMID: 32680477]
  14. Ophthalmol Retina. 2023 Aug;7(8):652-660 [PMID: 36822322]
  15. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:7194927 [PMID: 28660080]
  16. Retina. 2012 Oct;32(9):1821-8 [PMID: 23011184]
  17. Med Image Anal. 2022 Jul;79:102444 [PMID: 35472844]
  18. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):557-566 [PMID: 29566105]
  19. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):21-9 [PMID: 26513684]
  20. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):355-64 [PMID: 24790885]
  21. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar 15;173(6):676-82 [PMID: 21330339]
  22. Lancet. 2018 Sep 29;392(10153):1147-1159 [PMID: 30303083]
  23. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020 May;76:100825 [PMID: 31899290]
  24. Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591 [PMID: 31372058]
  25. Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 17;7:449-90 [PMID: 26604824]
  26. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9 [PMID: 24965263]
  27. Ophthalmology. 2021 Mar;128(3):417-424 [PMID: 32781110]
  28. Retina. 2017 Oct;37(10):1847-1858 [PMID: 28106709]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VEGFnAMDmortalitytreatmentriskall-causeCVDpatientsinhibitorsinhibitoryearsexposedindividualsamongPatientswithout10decreasedsafetyintravitrealage-relatedmaculardegenerationimpactdiseasestudy65analysisoutcomescompositecomparednumberdosesassociationaverageHR95%increasedMortalityNeovascularPurpose:ControversyexistsregardingsystemicneovascularaimedinvestigatepotentialcardiovascularDesign:nationwideregister-basedcohort16follow-upParticipants:n = 37 733unexposedn = 1 897 073agedresidingDenmarkJanuary2007December31 2022Methods:CoxproportionalhazardsconductedassesseffectincidentMainOutcomeMeasures:predefinedplandefinedprimaryhazardratiosHRsendpointtreatedsecondaryencompassedanalysesexploredexposureoutcomespecifictimeperiodResults:Overall637%womenage699interquartilerange0-76demonstratedreduced79confidenceinterval[CI]78-08104CI01-107persistedsignificantgroupedconsideredwithin60dayspostinjectionConclusions:revealed4%unlikelydirectlypathophysiologicallyrelatedInsteadspeculateundergoinggoodhealthadequatepersonalresourcesThereforealsohigherlikelihoodoverallsurvivalfindingsstronglysupporttermsFinancialDisclosures:authorsproprietarycommercialinterestmaterialsdiscussedarticleInhibitionAssociatesDecreasedRiskAge-relatedMacularDegenerationCardiovascularVascularendothelialgrowthfactor

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)