Developing a novel energy-based approach for measuring mental workload.

Abdulaziz Alotaibi, John Gambatese, Chukwuma Nnaji
Author Information
  1. Abdulaziz Alotaibi: School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  2. John Gambatese: School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  3. Chukwuma Nnaji: Department of Construction Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Abstract

Minimal research has been conducted to develop non-invasive processes for quantifying and evaluating worker mental workload - a critical concern - at the task level in the construction industry. One reason for this gap in research is the complex and dynamic nature of the construction process, which makes construction work more complicated to measure and predict compared to work in other industries. This paper presents a novel approach and corresponding conceptual model to quantify and evaluate construction worker perception of mental workload at the task level using the energy concept. A conceptual process for assessing mental workload (MWL), i.e., the feeling of stress, pressure, and being overwhelmed due to the task nature, factors, conditions, and resources that accompany the performance of the task, was developed from extant research and interviews. The Delphi method was utilized to characterize the energy-based model and provide initial verification. The results from the literature review, expert insight, and four rounds of the Delphi survey revealed 14 constituents, 51 components, and one metric for each component to measure the level of MWL felt by a worker. These constituents, components, and metrics were used to develop a model for measuring construction worker MWL. This study contributes to knowledge by developing a novel non-invasive method for assessing potential task-level MWL using an energy-based model. The energy-based assessment model contributes to practice by providing a tool that could be used to measure the potential impact of construction tasks on workers perceived mental workload.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutr Rev. 2001 Jan;59(1 Pt 2):S2-4 [PMID: 11255797]
  2. Surg Innov. 2005 Mar;12(1):80-90 [PMID: 15846451]
  3. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  4. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;65(3):245-50 [PMID: 25701835]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 30;15(11): [PMID: 30380789]
  6. Nutr Rev. 2006 Jul;64(7 Pt 2):S1 [PMID: 16910213]
  7. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70 [PMID: 10720363]
  8. Nutr Neurosci. 2007 Oct-Dec;10(5-6):229-42 [PMID: 18284031]
  9. J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):77-93 [PMID: 15641891]
  10. J Psychosom Res. 2004 Nov;57(5):435-41 [PMID: 15581646]
  11. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2013 Jun;19(2):95-107 [PMID: 23795978]
  12. Nutr Rev. 2001 Apr;59(4):91-102 [PMID: 11368507]
  13. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2003 Jun;9(2):119-37 [PMID: 12877271]
  14. Accid Anal Prev. 2004 May;36(3):359-66 [PMID: 15003580]
  15. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):314-28 [PMID: 19102615]
  16. Sports Med. 2017 Aug;47(8):1569-1588 [PMID: 28044281]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workloadconstructionmentalmodelworkertaskMWLenergy-basedresearchlevelmeasurenovelDelphidevelopnon-invasive-natureprocessworkapproachconceptualusingenergyassessingperformancemethodconstituentscomponentsusedmeasuringcontributespotentialMentalMinimalconductedprocessesquantifyingevaluatingcriticalconcernindustryOnereasongapcomplexdynamicmakescomplicatedpredictcomparedindustriespaperpresentscorrespondingquantifyevaluateperceptionconceptiefeelingstresspressureoverwhelmedduefactorsconditionsresourcesaccompanydevelopedextantinterviewsutilizedcharacterizeprovideinitialverificationresultsliteraturereviewexpertinsightfourroundssurveyrevealed1451onemetriccomponentfeltmetricsstudyknowledgedevelopingtask-levelassessmentpracticeprovidingtoolimpacttasksworkersperceivedDevelopingtechniqueTaskcharacteristicsWorker

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.