Individual evaluation of fatigue at work to enhance the safety performance in the construction industry: A systematic review.

Pei Pei Heng, Hanizah Mohd Yusoff, Rozita Hod
Author Information
  1. Pei Pei Heng: Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ORCID
  2. Hanizah Mohd Yusoff: Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ORCID
  3. Rozita Hod: Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ORCID

Abstract

The construction industry is recognized as one of the most hazardous industries globally due to the dynamic on site activities and labour-intensive characteristics. The construction tasks are physically and cognitively demanding therefore the construction workers are prone to work fatigue which compromises safety performance. The evaluation of fit for duty, or fitness for work (FFW) aims to determine if workers are at risk of adverse impacts of ill-health, injury or accidents. This systematic review aimed to critically summarize up-to-date measures and evaluation tools that were employed to monitor work fitness or fatigue specifically among construction workers. Adhering with the PRISMA protocol, three databases were searched from the inception to 2022, with a total combination of 37 keywords, concluding to the selection of 20 relevant articles. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used as the guide for the study appraisal. A total of 20 articles were reviewed, published from 2008-2022. Majority of the studies employed experimental design. The review identified the subjective evaluation scales and objective measurement tool. The subjective self-response questionnaires can be categorized into single dimension or multidimension covering both physical and mental fitness; whereas the objective measurement tool can be categorized into physiological metrics, physical and cognitive performance measure. The available scientific evidence has raised the relevant issues for on-site practicality and potentially guide the formulation of evidence-based guidelines for the FFW assessment in the construction industry.

References

  1. J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 23;10(16): [PMID: 34442050]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 14;20(2): [PMID: 36674293]
  3. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014 Jun;27(3):413-25 [PMID: 24952141]
  4. J Occup Rehabil. 2004 Dec;14(4):255-66 [PMID: 15638256]
  5. Ergonomics. 1978 Mar;21(3):231-3 [PMID: 27351]
  6. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov;29(8):2647-2657 [PMID: 34351017]
  7. West J Nurs Res. 2020 Feb;42(2):108-116 [PMID: 31007153]
  8. Sports Med. 2020 May;50(5):853-870 [PMID: 31845202]
  9. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Aug;90(6):517-526 [PMID: 28343280]
  10. Int J Biometeorol. 2003 Sep;48(1):15-9 [PMID: 12695888]
  11. Sleep Med Rev. 2014 Apr;18(2):141-52 [PMID: 23796506]
  12. Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):591-6 [PMID: 18620333]
  13. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Mar;71(3):327-343 [PMID: 29198388]
  14. Acta Oncol. 2001;40(1):37-43 [PMID: 11321658]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 05;18(5): [PMID: 33807980]
  16. J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Feb;38(1):71-81 [PMID: 16312912]
  17. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):1096 [PMID: 35058540]
  18. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Oct;58(10):961-973 [PMID: 27525527]
  19. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 22;8:360 [PMID: 32391353]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 13;16(4): [PMID: 30781731]
  21. Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;65(3):245-50 [PMID: 25701835]
  22. J Inj Violence Res. 2018 Jul;10(2):105-112 [PMID: 29991668]
  23. Occup Environ Med. 2009 Apr;66(4):211-20 [PMID: 19017690]
  24. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(1):85-8 [PMID: 15809244]
  25. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Feb;45(2):185-96 [PMID: 12625233]
  26. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Dec;22(23):8519-8536 [PMID: 30556895]
  27. Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):1068-1073 [PMID: 29790409]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 18;18(8): [PMID: 33919602]
  29. Med Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;105(1):137-148 [PMID: 33246515]
  30. Mil Med. 2005 Jan;170(1):14-20 [PMID: 15724848]
  31. Acta Med Iran. 2013 May 07;51(4):265-9 [PMID: 23690108]
  32. Saf Health Work. 2016 Mar;7(1):43-8 [PMID: 27014490]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15): [PMID: 32731366]
  34. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 30;21(21): [PMID: 34770556]
  35. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94990 [PMID: 24736313]
  36. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Jan;48(1):66-73 [PMID: 26641770]
  37. Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1705-11 [PMID: 24980679]
  38. Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Nov;22(11):1433-41 [PMID: 12432970]
  39. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e036849 [PMID: 32978189]
  40. Extrem Physiol Med. 2015 Aug 14;4:12 [PMID: 26273431]
  41. Gait Posture. 2009 Jun;29(4):552-7 [PMID: 19168359]
  42. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2012 Jul-Sep;34(3 Suppl):357-60 [PMID: 23405661]
  43. BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 08;13:305 [PMID: 23565883]
  44. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017 May 08;30(3):407-417 [PMID: 28481374]
  45. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 01;18(3): [PMID: 33535523]
  46. Occup Environ Med. 2007 May;64(5):304-12 [PMID: 17095547]
  47. Ind Psychiatry J. 2015 Jan-Jun;24(1):12-7 [PMID: 26257477]
  48. Appl Ergon. 2004 May;35(3):233-41 [PMID: 15145286]
  49. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87 [PMID: 26262565]
  50. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2(2):92-8 [PMID: 5523831]
  51. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Feb;58(2):220-8 [PMID: 25603944]
  52. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jun 28;13(7): [PMID: 27367706]
  53. Occup Med (Lond). 2003 Feb;53(1):5-9 [PMID: 12576558]
  54. Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:267-279 [PMID: 26775077]
  55. PeerJ. 2019 Nov 26;7:e8000 [PMID: 31788353]
  56. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jan;35(1):1-5 [PMID: 19277432]

MeSH Term

Humans
Construction Industry
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Physical Examination
Fatigue

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0constructionworkevaluationworkersfatigueperformancefitnessreviewindustrysafetyFFWsystematicemployedtotal20relevantarticlesguidesubjectiveobjectivemeasurementtoolcancategorizedphysicalrecognizedonehazardousindustriesgloballyduedynamicsiteactivitieslabour-intensivecharacteristicstasksphysicallycognitivelydemandingthereforepronecompromisesfitdutyaimsdetermineriskadverseimpactsill-healthinjuryaccidentsaimedcriticallysummarizeup-to-datemeasurestoolsmonitorspecificallyamongAdheringPRISMAprotocolthreedatabasessearchedinception2022combination37keywordsconcludingselectionMixedMethodAppraisalToolMMATusedstudyappraisalreviewedpublished2008-2022Majoritystudiesexperimentaldesignidentifiedscalesself-responsequestionnairessingledimensionmultidimensioncoveringmentalwhereasphysiologicalmetricscognitivemeasureavailablescientificevidenceraisedissueson-sitepracticalitypotentiallyformulationevidence-basedguidelinesassessmentIndividualenhanceindustry:

Similar Articles

Cited By