Awareness and knowledge of drug decriminalization among people who use drugs in British Columbia: a multi-method pre-implementation study.

Alissa Greer, Jessica Xavier, Olivia K Loewen, Brooke Kinniburgh, Alexis Crabtree
Author Information
  1. Alissa Greer: School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A1S6, Canada. Alissa_greer@sfu.ca.
  2. Jessica Xavier: School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A1S6, Canada.
  3. Olivia K Loewen: Public Health Agency of Canada, Sinclair Centre Federal Building, 218-757 Hastings St. West, Vancouver, BC, V6C 1A1, Canada.
  4. Brooke Kinniburgh: British Columbia Center for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
  5. Alexis Crabtree: British Columbia Center for Disease Control, 655 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In January 2023, British Columbia implemented a three-year exemption to Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, as granted by the federal government of Canada, to decriminalize the personal possession of small amounts of certain illegal drugs. This decriminalization policy, the first in Canada, was announced in response to the overdose emergency in British Columbia as a public health intervention that could help curb overdose deaths by reducing the impact of criminalization and increasing access to health and social services through stigma reduction.
METHODS: The current multi-method study examines people who use drugs' awareness and knowledge of British Columbia's decriminalization model through cross-sectional quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews among people who use drugs from September-November 2022, immediately prior to the implementation of decriminalization.
RESULTS: Quantitative findings show that two-thirds (63%) of people who use drugs were aware of the policy, but substantial knowledge gaps existed about the legal protections afforded (threshold amount, substances included, drug trafficking, confiscation). The qualitative findings suggest that people who use drugs misunderstood the details of the provincial decriminalization model and often conflated it with regulation. Results suggest that information sharing about decriminalization were minimal pre-implementation, highlighting areas for knowledge dissemination about people who use drugs' rights under this policy.
CONCLUSIONS: Given that decriminalization in British Columbia is a new and landmark reform, and that the success of decriminalization and its benefits may be undermined by poor awareness and knowledge of it, efforts to share information, increase understanding, and empower the community, may be required to promote its implementation and benefits for the community.

Keywords

References

  1. Contemp Drug Probl. 2023 Mar;50(1):3-24 [PMID: 36733491]
  2. Health Educ Behav. 2022 Aug;49(4):629-638 [PMID: 33660550]
  3. Health Info Libr J. 2022 Mar;39(1):59-67 [PMID: 33615631]
  4. Subst Abus. 2021;42(3):284-293 [PMID: 31657675]
  5. PLoS Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):e1001570; discussion e1001570 [PMID: 24339753]
  6. Harm Reduct J. 2019 May 2;16(1):30 [PMID: 31046759]
  7. J Prim Prev. 2017 Aug;38(4):345-362 [PMID: 28224349]
  8. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223823 [PMID: 31622401]
  9. Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jan;27:178-81 [PMID: 26644025]
  10. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 May 25;17(1):42 [PMID: 35614474]
  11. Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Mar;22(2):87-94 [PMID: 21392957]
  12. Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):393-400 [PMID: 32264789]
  13. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:199-207 [PMID: 31542327]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):1276 [PMID: 35773669]
  15. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Oct;48:115-124 [PMID: 28734745]
  16. AMA J Ethics. 2020 Aug 1;22(1):E723-728 [PMID: 32880362]
  17. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Dec;50:82-89 [PMID: 29040841]
  18. J Health Commun. 2011 Oct;16(9):1006-23 [PMID: 21728781]
  19. J Urban Health. 2015 Apr;92(2):338-51 [PMID: 25300503]
  20. Addict Behav. 2019 Jan;88:23-28 [PMID: 30103098]
  21. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr;78:102700 [PMID: 32086155]
  22. Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jul;21(4):321-9 [PMID: 20116989]
  23. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Jun;23(3):246-55 [PMID: 10871540]
  24. Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan;25(1):105-11 [PMID: 23916801]
  25. Harm Reduct J. 2014 Apr 27;11:13 [PMID: 24766846]
  26. BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e071379 [PMID: 37160395]
  27. AIDS Care. 2010 May;22(5):623-9 [PMID: 20229375]
  28. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Nov;97:103410 [PMID: 34438275]
  29. Am J Public Health. 2023 Jul;113(7):750-758 [PMID: 37285563]
  30. AIDS Care. 2010 Nov;22(11):1305-13 [PMID: 20640954]
  31. Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:1-8 [PMID: 29306177]
  32. Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Apr;102:103605 [PMID: 35131688]
  33. Harm Reduct J. 2016 Jul 26;13(1):24 [PMID: 27455957]
  34. Int J Prison Health. 2021 Aug 25;: [PMID: 34633774]
  35. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:103039 [PMID: 33227637]
  36. Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jul;105:103714 [PMID: 35561485]
  37. J Urban Health. 2013 Dec;90(6):1102-11 [PMID: 23900788]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;103:1-6 [PMID: 24445152]
  39. Harm Reduct J. 2017 Nov 8;14(1):72 [PMID: 29117858]
  40. Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102623 [PMID: 31865117]
  41. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108257 [PMID: 32947173]
  42. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Feb;64:40-46 [PMID: 30554076]
  43. Subst Use Misuse. 2010 May;45(6):813-64 [PMID: 20397872]
  44. Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1427-1480 [PMID: 27021149]
  45. Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:44-49 [PMID: 29986271]
  46. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Aug;19(4):324-31 [PMID: 17997089]
  47. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jan 1;113(1):62-8 [PMID: 20727684]
  48. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Dec;26(12):1251-7 [PMID: 26205676]
  49. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Aug;19(4):332-8 [PMID: 17900888]
  50. Fam Pract. 2003 Aug;20(4):457-63 [PMID: 12876121]
  51. J Rural Health. 2007 Summer;23(3):270-5 [PMID: 17565529]
  52. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(9):1392-1399 [PMID: 35676857]
  53. J Res Nurs. 2020 Aug;25(5):443-455 [PMID: 34394658]
  54. Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jan;87:102981 [PMID: 33129133]
  55. Contemp Drug Probl. 2022 Jun;49(2):170-191 [PMID: 35465248]

MeSH Term

Humans
British Columbia
Cross-Sectional Studies
Illicit Drugs
Drug Overdose
Law Enforcement

Chemicals

Illicit Drugs

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0decriminalizationpeopleuseBritishdrugsknowledgepolicyColumbiaCanadaoverdosehealthmulti-methodstudydrugs'awarenessmodelqualitativeamongimplementationQuantitativefindingsdrugsuggestinformationpre-implementationbenefitsmaycommunityBACKGROUND:January2023implementedthree-yearexemptionControlledDrugsSubstancesActgrantedfederalgovernmentdecriminalizepersonalpossessionsmallamountscertainillegalfirstannouncedresponseemergencypublicinterventionhelpcurbdeathsreducingimpactcriminalizationincreasingaccesssocialservicesstigmareductionMETHODS:currentexaminesColumbia'scross-sectionalquantitativesurveysinterviewsSeptember-November2022immediatelypriorRESULTS:showtwo-thirds63%awaresubstantialgapsexistedlegalprotectionsaffordedthresholdamountsubstancesincludedtraffickingconfiscationmisunderstooddetailsprovincialoftenconflatedregulationResultssharingminimalhighlightingareasdisseminationrightsCONCLUSIONS:GivennewlandmarkreformsuccessunderminedpooreffortsshareincreaseunderstandingempowerrequiredpromoteAwarenessColumbia:DecriminalizationDrugQualitative

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)