Visual-, Olfactory-, and Nectar-Taste-Based Flower Aposematism.

Simcha Lev-Yadun
Author Information
  1. Simcha Lev-Yadun: Department of Biology & Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa-Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel. ORCID

Abstract

Florivory, i.e., flower herbivory, of various types is common and can strongly reduce plant fitness. Flowers suffer two very different types of herbivory: (1) the classic herbivory of consuming tissues and (2) nectar theft. Unlike the non-reversibility of consumed tissues, nectar theft, while potentially reducing a plant's fitness by lowering its attraction to pollinators, can, in various cases, be fixed quickly by the production of additional nectar. Therefore, various mechanisms to avoid or reduce florivory have evolved. Here, I focus on one of the flowers' defensive mechanisms, aposematism, i.e., warning signaling to avoid or at least reduce herbivory via the repelling of herbivores. While plant aposematism of various types was almost ignored until the year 2000, it is a common anti-herbivory defense mechanism in many plant taxa, operating visually, olfactorily, and, in the case of nectar, via a bitter taste. Flower aposematism has received only very little focused attention as such, and many of the relevant publications that actually demonstrated herbivore repellence and avoidance learning following flower signaling did not refer to repellence as aposematism. Here, I review what is known concerning visual-, olfactory-, and nectar-taste-based flower aposematism, including some relevant cases of mimicry, and suggest some lines for future research.

Keywords

References

  1. J Evol Biol. 2022 Oct;35(10):1245-1282 [PMID: 35975328]
  2. Naturwissenschaften. 1999 Aug;86(8):404-5 [PMID: 10481828]
  3. Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;9(3):584-92 [PMID: 17298359]
  4. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2022 Aug;52:100943 [PMID: 35691585]
  5. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Dec;24(12):676-85 [PMID: 19683828]
  6. Oecologia. 2006 Feb;147(1):53-9 [PMID: 16205954]
  7. Am Nat. 2010 Mar;175(3):335-49 [PMID: 20100107]
  8. Ann Bot. 2019 Oct 18;124(3):343-353 [PMID: 31206146]
  9. Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 27;9(43):eadg2555 [PMID: 37878700]
  10. Essays Biochem. 2022 Dec 8;66(6):753-768 [PMID: 36205404]
  11. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):166-73 [PMID: 19178979]
  12. Ecology. 2006 Nov;87(11):2709-16 [PMID: 17168015]
  13. J Theor Biol. 2001 Jun 7;210(3):385-8 [PMID: 11397139]
  14. Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Nov;6(11):1739-40 [PMID: 22067106]
  15. J Theor Biol. 2015 Jan 7;364:1-6 [PMID: 25193285]
  16. Nature. 1994 Nov 10;372(6502):169-72 [PMID: 7969448]
  17. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Feb;82(1):83-111 [PMID: 17313525]
  18. Curr Biol. 2023 Jan 9;33(1):R36-R39 [PMID: 36626863]
  19. New Phytol. 2023 Nov 20;: [PMID: 37984873]
  20. Evolution. 2004 Nov;58(11):2426-37 [PMID: 15612286]
  21. Nature. 2002 Dec 12;420(6916):625-6 [PMID: 12478279]
  22. Elife. 2022 Oct 11;11: [PMID: 36217820]
  23. New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):506-512 [PMID: 19515224]
  24. Ecol Lett. 2013 Mar;16(3):299-306 [PMID: 23173705]
  25. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Feb;93(1):555-573 [PMID: 28901723]
  26. Plant Signal Behav. 2013 Jul;8(7):e24907 [PMID: 23656862]
  27. New Phytol. 2009;182(1):251-260 [PMID: 19076293]
  28. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43869 [PMID: 22952793]
  29. Bioessays. 2009 Jan;31(1):84-8 [PMID: 19154006]
  30. Plant J. 2023 Aug;115(4):874-894 [PMID: 37340521]
  31. Ecol Lett. 2010 May;13(5):643-56 [PMID: 20337694]
  32. Plant Signal Behav. 2018;13(6):e1480846 [PMID: 29888995]
  33. Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Apr;16(4):191-200 [PMID: 21345715]
  34. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2004;2004(5):314-320 [PMID: 15577195]
  35. New Phytol. 2020 Dec;228(6):1972-1985 [PMID: 32533864]
  36. New Phytol. 2006;172(3):452-68 [PMID: 17083676]
  37. New Phytol. 1994 Oct;128(2):363-368 [PMID: 33874378]
  38. Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul 10;12(7):e9019 [PMID: 35845388]
  39. Plant J. 2007 Mar;49(5):840-54 [PMID: 17316174]
  40. Science. 1981 Jul 24;213(4506):476 [PMID: 7244647]
  41. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Aug;7(4):434-40 [PMID: 15231267]
  42. Curr Biol. 2023 Apr 24;33(8):1502-1512.e8 [PMID: 36963385]
  43. Annu Rev Entomol. 2022 Jan 7;67:163-180 [PMID: 34995091]
  44. Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;12(16): [PMID: 37631189]
  45. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul;34(7):595-604 [PMID: 31027839]
  46. Ecol Lett. 2013 Sep;16(9):1157-67 [PMID: 23841830]
  47. J Theor Biol. 2003 Sep 21;224(2):183-8 [PMID: 12927525]
  48. New Phytol. 2018 Apr;218(1):380-392 [PMID: 29369384]
  49. Plant Signal Behav. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):1991712 [PMID: 34839800]
  50. Ann Bot. 2010 May;105(5):777-82 [PMID: 20228087]
  51. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 24;11:558684 [PMID: 33072143]
  52. Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1489-508 [PMID: 8023461]
  53. Oecologia. 2013 May;172(1):189-95 [PMID: 23080301]
  54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 24;99(26):16823-8 [PMID: 12482948]
  55. Science. 1976 Jul 2;193(4247):24-9 [PMID: 17793989]
  56. Science. 2008 Aug 29;321(5893):1200-2 [PMID: 18755975]
  57. Bioessays. 2008 Sep;30(9):889-96 [PMID: 18693267]
  58. Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 21;27(16):2552-2558.e3 [PMID: 28803876]
  59. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5316 [PMID: 19401760]
  60. Evolution. 1966 Sep;20(3):249-275 [PMID: 28562970]
  61. Ecol Lett. 2006 Dec;9(12):1351-65 [PMID: 17118009]
  62. J Plant Res. 2014 Mar;127(2):265-73 [PMID: 24253757]
  63. Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Mar;4(3):206-15 [PMID: 12610525]
  64. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 30;11:991 [PMID: 32714360]
  65. Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jun;4(6):482-3 [PMID: 19816137]
  66. New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1607-1620 [PMID: 31087371]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nectaraposematismflowerherbivoryvarioustypesreduceplantiecommoncanfitnesstissuestheftcasesmechanismsavoidsignalingviamanyFlowerrelevantrepellenceFlorivorystronglyFlowerssuffertwodifferentherbivory:1classicconsuming2Unlikenon-reversibilityconsumedpotentiallyreducingplant'sloweringattractionpollinatorsfixedquicklyproductionadditionalThereforeflorivoryevolvedfocusoneflowers'defensivewarningleastrepellingherbivoresalmostignoredyear2000anti-herbivorydefensemechanismtaxaoperatingvisuallyolfactorilycasebittertastereceivedlittlefocusedattentionpublicationsactuallydemonstratedherbivoreavoidancelearningfollowingreferreviewknownconcerningvisual-olfactory-nectar-taste-basedincludingmimicrysuggestlinesfutureresearchVisual-Olfactory-Nectar-Taste-BasedAposematismaposematiccolorationolfactorypoisonousplantssecondarymetabolitestoxic

Similar Articles

Cited By