Review of robotic surgery platforms and end effectors.

Francesco Cepolina, Roberto Razzoli
Author Information
  1. Francesco Cepolina: DIMEC-PMAR Lab, Instrumental Robot Design Research Group, Department of Machines Mechanics and Design, University of Genova, Via All'Opera Pia 15A, 16145, Genoa, Italy. francesco.cepolina@edu.unige.it. ORCID
  2. Roberto Razzoli: DIMEC-PMAR Lab, Instrumental Robot Design Research Group, Department of Machines Mechanics and Design, University of Genova, Via All'Opera Pia 15A, 16145, Genoa, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

In the last 50 years, the number of companies producing automated devices for surgical operations has grown extensively. The population started to be more confident about the technology capabilities. The first patents related to surgical robotics are expiring and this knowledge is becoming a common base for the development of future surgical robotics. The review describes some of the most popular companies manufacturing surgical robots. The list of the company does not pretend to be exhaustive but wishes to give an overview of the sector. Due to space constraints, only a limited selction of companies is reported. Most of the companies described are born in America or Europe. Advantages and limitations of each product firm are described. A special focus is given to the end effectors; their shape and dexterity are crucial for the positive outcome of the surgical operations. New robots are developed every year, and existing robots are allowed to perform a wider range of procedures. Robotic technologies improve the abilities of surgeons in the domains of urology, gynecology, neurology, spine surgery, orthopedic reconstruction (knee, shoulder), hair restoration, oral surgery, thoracic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopy.

Keywords

References

  1. Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;9(3): [PMID: 35327674]
  2. Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1064-1079 [PMID: 33638104]
  3. BMC Pulm Med. 2019 May 9;19(1):89 [PMID: 31072355]
  4. Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6015-6024 [PMID: 37097456]
  5. J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):587-596 [PMID: 34282555]
  6. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 Sep 1;23(3):182-187 [PMID: 35972079]
  7. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1178-1180 [PMID: 33712225]
  8. CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Jan 27;7(1):14 [PMID: 38279977]
  9. Int J Med Robot. 2022 Aug;18(4):e2409 [PMID: 35476899]
  10. Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4414-4420 [PMID: 36759353]
  11. Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3391-3397 [PMID: 27873012]
  12. SICOT J. 2017;3:63 [PMID: 29087292]
  13. Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Apr 7;2:37 [PMID: 35603289]
  14. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 6;13(1):19215 [PMID: 37932393]
  15. Dermatol Clin. 2014 Jan;32(1):97-107 [PMID: 24267426]
  16. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):363-368 [PMID: 32013727]
  17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3585-3598 [PMID: 32975626]
  18. J Robot Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):705-713 [PMID: 34410583]
  19. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jul 31;85(9):4307-4314 [PMID: 37663714]
  20. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4928 [PMID: 32188899]
  21. World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e450-e456 [PMID: 30500594]
  22. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Aug;29(8):1077-1080 [PMID: 31161953]
  23. Trials. 2023 Oct 17;24(1):674 [PMID: 37848908]
  24. Smart Med. 2022 Dec 27;1(1):e20220021 [PMID: 39188736]
  25. World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:435-442 [PMID: 33059080]
  26. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):405-411 [PMID: 37793795]
  27. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Nov;45(11):1701-1709 [PMID: 36127519]
  28. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jun 23;6(4):613-618 [PMID: 34401479]
  29. Head Neck. 2017 Mar;39(3):471-475 [PMID: 27792258]
  30. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3484-3493 [PMID: 31144119]
  31. J Endourol. 2005 Oct;19(8):940-51 [PMID: 16253055]
  32. Front Robot AI. 2023 Oct 06;10:1227708 [PMID: 37868273]
  33. Rare Tumors. 2017 Mar 28;9(1):6942 [PMID: 28435647]
  34. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 27;59(2): [PMID: 36837438]
  35. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Nov;142(5):1367-1376 [PMID: 30119108]
  36. Am J Med Qual. 2022 May-Jun 01;37(3):236-245 [PMID: 34803134]
  37. Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):981-986 [PMID: 27369284]
  38. Front Surg. 2021 May 11;8:656270 [PMID: 34046424]
  39. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2049-2058 [PMID: 34255173]
  40. Arthroplast Today. 2018 Feb 16;4(2):240-243 [PMID: 29896561]
  41. Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2024 [PMID: 31267676]
  42. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 May;29(3):248-253 [PMID: 29553953]
  43. World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e278-e285 [PMID: 32014548]
  44. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):5007-5016 [PMID: 34146132]

MeSH Term

Humans
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Robotics
Gynecology
Knowledge
Oral Surgical Procedures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgerysurgicalcompaniesroboticsrobotseffectorsoperationsdescribedendRoboticlast50 yearsnumberproducingautomateddevicesgrownextensivelypopulationstartedconfidenttechnologycapabilitiesfirstpatentsrelatedexpiringknowledgebecomingcommonbasedevelopmentfuturereviewdescribespopularmanufacturinglistcompanypretendexhaustivewishesgiveoverviewsectorDuespaceconstraintslimitedselctionis reportedbornAmericaEuropeAdvantageslimitationsproductfirmspecialfocusgivenshapedexteritycrucialpositiveoutcomeNewdevelopedeveryyearexistingallowedperformwiderrangeprocedurestechnologiesimproveabilitiessurgeonsdomainsurologygynecologyneurologyspineorthopedicreconstructionkneeshoulderhairrestorationoralthoraciclaparoscopicendoscopyReviewroboticplatformsCommercialproductsEndEndoscopicRoboticallyassistedSurgical

Similar Articles

Cited By