Effect of the case-based learning method combined with virtual reality simulation technology on midwifery laboratory courses: A quasi-experimental study.

Lingyun Zhao, Xiaohong Dai, Siyu Chen
Author Information
  1. Lingyun Zhao: Nursing College, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
  2. Xiaohong Dai: Nursing College, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
  3. Siyu Chen: Nursing College, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of case-based learning (CBL) method with virtual reality (VR) simulation technology (CBL-VR) on midwifery laboratory courses.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was employed. A total of 135 midwifery students were recruited from Nursing College of Guilin Medical University in China from September 2020 to January 2022. Intervention group recruited students from the Class of 2019 ( = 59) and control group recruited students from the Class of 2018 ( = 76). The intervention group students received the CBL-VR method based on traditional laboratory teaching, the contents of course included four sections: eutocia (6 class hours), dystocia (6 class hours), umbilical cord prolapse (2 class hours), and neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation (4 class hours), 40 min per class hour. The control group students received the traditional laboratory teaching. Students' academic performance, Self-Directed Learning (SDL) Ability Questionnaire, and the education satisfaction questionnaire were used to evaluate the teaching efficacy between two groups.
Results: After intervention, the intervention group students achieved higher scores than the control group in individual operation ability (90.88 ± 2.14 vs. 89.24 ± 3.15), team operation ability (90.97 ± 2.33 vs. 81.28 ± 5.45), and midwifery case analysis ability (88.64 ± 3.19 vs. 86.70 ± 2.56) ( <0.01). Prior to the implementation of the course, there was no difference in the SDL ability scores between the two groups of students ( > 0.05). However, following the course intervention, the SDL ability scores of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group (94.78 ± 6.59 vs. 88.12 ± 8.36), and the scores in all dimensions of the intervention group were also higher ( < 0.05). Additionally, more than 94% of the students indicated that CBL-VR method developed comprehensive abilities, including independent-study enthusiasm, independent thinking, collaboration, and communication.
Conclusion: Using the CBL-VR method in midwifery lab courses improved students' course performance, SDL ability, and comprehensive ability. Students highly recognized the effectiveness of this approach.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103409 [PMID: 35868062]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:209-18 [PMID: 27125175]
  3. Nurs Philos. 2021 Jan;22(1):e12332 [PMID: 33029860]
  4. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e24-e32 [PMID: 33275948]
  5. Med Teach. 2019 Oct;41(10):1124-1128 [PMID: 31215320]
  6. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Nov;33:114-120 [PMID: 30293052]
  7. Women Birth. 2022 Nov;35(6):e590-e597 [PMID: 35181239]
  8. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  9. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 03;11(7): [PMID: 37046944]
  10. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):e12702 [PMID: 30338594]
  11. J Dent Educ. 2022 Aug;86(8):1025-1035 [PMID: 35307835]
  12. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):710 [PMID: 37770884]
  13. J Family Reprod Health. 2021 Sep;15(3):186-195 [PMID: 34721610]
  14. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 [PMID: 19897823]
  15. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jul;114:105395 [PMID: 35567909]
  16. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):240 [PMID: 27633506]
  17. Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Jan;13(1):48-58 [PMID: 30663269]
  18. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Mar;36:91-96 [PMID: 30897460]
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Oct;129:105903 [PMID: 37467707]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104998 [PMID: 34139583]
  21. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 22;21(1):e12959 [PMID: 30668519]
  22. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Aug;103:104979 [PMID: 34049120]
  23. Women Birth. 2022 May;35(3):e199-e210 [PMID: 34217676]
  24. Med Sci Educ. 2021 Jan 08;31(2):945-962 [PMID: 34457935]
  25. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):775 [PMID: 36357886]
  26. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529 [PMID: 30882355]
  27. Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1383-1392 [PMID: 36210506]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupstudentsabilityinterventionmethodmidwiferylaboratoryclasslearningCBL-VRcontrolcoursehoursSDLscoresvsrealitysimulationtechnologycoursesrecruitedteachinghigherstudyevaluatecase-basedvirtualquasi-experimentalNursingClassreceivedtraditional6performanceeducationtwogroupsoperation908805comprehensiveObjective:aimedeffectCBLVRMethods:designemployedtotal135CollegeGuilinMedicalUniversityChinaSeptember2020January2022Intervention2019 = 592018 = 76basedcontentsincludedfoursections:eutociadystociaumbilicalcordprolapse2neonatalasphyxiaresuscitation440 minperhourStudents'academicSelf-DirectedLearningAbilityQuestionnairesatisfactionquestionnaireusedefficacyResults:achievedindividual88 ± 2148924 ± 315team97 ± 2338128 ± 545caseanalysis64 ± 3198670 ± 256<001Priorimplementationdifference0Howeverfollowing9478 ± 65912 ± 836dimensionsalso< 0Additionally94%indicateddevelopedabilitiesincludingindependent-studyenthusiasmindependentthinkingcollaborationcommunicationConclusion:Usinglabimprovedstudents'StudentshighlyrecognizedeffectivenessapproachEffectcombinedcourses:Case-basedMidwiferySelf-directedVirtual

Similar Articles

Cited By