Auditory Category Learning in Children With Dyslexia.

Casey L Roark, Vishal Thakkar, Bharath Chandrasekaran, Tracy M Centanni
Author Information
  1. Casey L Roark: Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA. ORCID
  2. Vishal Thakkar: Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth.
  3. Bharath Chandrasekaran: Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
  4. Tracy M Centanni: Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Developmental Dyslexia is proposed to involve selective procedural memory deficits with intact declarative memory. Recent research in the domain of category learning has demonstrated that adults with Dyslexia have selective deficits in Information-Integration (II) category learning that is proposed to rely on procedural learning mechanisms and unaffected Rule-Based (RB) category learning that is proposed to rely on declarative, hypothesis testing mechanisms. Importantly, learning mechanisms also change across development, with distinct developmental trajectories in both procedural and declarative learning mechanisms. It is unclear how Dyslexia in childhood should influence auditory category learning, a critical skill for speech perception and reading development.
METHOD: We examined auditory category learning performance and strategies in 7- to 12-year-old children with Dyslexia ( = 25; nine females, 16 males) and typically developing controls ( = 25; 13 females, 12 males). Participants learned nonspeech auditory categories of spectrotemporal ripples that could be optimally learned with either RB selective attention to the temporal modulation dimension or procedural integration of information across spectral and temporal dimensions. We statistically compared performance using mixed-model analyses of variance and identified strategies using decision-bound computational models.
RESULTS: We found that children with Dyslexia have an apparent selective RB category learning deficit, rather than a selective II learning deficit observed in prior work in adults with Dyslexia.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the important skill of auditory category learning is impacted in children with Dyslexia and throughout development, individuals with Dyslexia may develop compensatory strategies that preserve declarative learning while developing difficulties in procedural learning.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25148519.

References

  1. Ann Dyslexia. 2004 Dec;54(2):281-303 [PMID: 15741939]
  2. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;48(6):769-784 [PMID: 34570548]
  3. Cognition. 2020 Sep;202:104327 [PMID: 32464341]
  4. Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):388-407 [PMID: 31016684]
  5. Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12584 [PMID: 28812307]
  6. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Mar;28(3):270-280 [PMID: 33823958]
  7. Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221118792 [PMID: 36131515]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):33-53 [PMID: 2963894]
  9. Neuropsychology. 2015 Nov;29(6):844-54 [PMID: 25730732]
  10. NPJ Sci Learn. 2023 May 13;8(1):14 [PMID: 37179364]
  11. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Jul;109(3):321-35 [PMID: 21377688]
  12. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104673 [PMID: 31430573]
  13. Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:131-43 [PMID: 26409017]
  14. Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104940 [PMID: 34715584]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Aug;140(2):1332 [PMID: 27586759]
  16. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1371-9 [PMID: 16136039]
  17. Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):606-8 [PMID: 1736364]
  18. J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105548 [PMID: 36126587]
  19. Dev Sci. 2019 Jul;22(4):e12813 [PMID: 30753746]
  20. Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1433-1448 [PMID: 37326771]
  21. J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;42(7):1328-1342 [PMID: 34969869]
  22. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):488-95 [PMID: 24002965]
  23. Dev Sci. 2021 Mar;24(2):e13026 [PMID: 32767496]
  24. Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:389-417 [PMID: 31337273]
  25. Dyslexia. 2019 Aug;25(3):246-255 [PMID: 31012175]
  26. Oxf Rev Educ. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):501-513 [PMID: 32939103]
  27. J Learn Disabil. 1988 Dec;21(10):590-604 [PMID: 2465364]
  28. J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 20;33(8):3500-4 [PMID: 23426677]
  29. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):898-909 [PMID: 33532985]
  30. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Nov;34:7-17 [PMID: 29894888]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14611-6 [PMID: 19667199]
  32. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):231-70 [PMID: 15037131]
  33. Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):553-8 [PMID: 15271001]
  34. J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:48-65 [PMID: 26491987]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Aug;24(8):1695-708 [PMID: 22621261]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 8;107(23):10389-94 [PMID: 20498069]
  37. Dev Psychol. 2023 May;59(5):963-975 [PMID: 36862449]
  38. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):683-98 [PMID: 19929331]
  39. Brain Lang. 1980 Mar;9(2):182-98 [PMID: 7363063]
  40. Nat Neurosci. 2006 Dec;9(12):1558-64 [PMID: 17115044]
  41. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):933-48 [PMID: 25528100]
  42. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:149-69 [PMID: 25558860]
  43. Psychol Rev. 1967 Nov;74(6):431-61 [PMID: 4170865]
  44. Dyslexia. 2020 Feb;26(1):36-51 [PMID: 31877576]
  45. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3460-76 [PMID: 23920029]
  46. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1318-34 [PMID: 24719236]
  47. Trends Neurosci. 2007 Apr;30(4):135-41 [PMID: 17328970]
  48. Psychol Sci. 2014 Jul;25(7):1362-70 [PMID: 24855019]
  49. Sci Am. 1996 Nov;275(5):98-104 [PMID: 8875810]
  50. Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 14;11(11): [PMID: 34827508]
  51. Science. 2013 Dec 6;342(6163):1251-4 [PMID: 24311693]
  52. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1518-33 [PMID: 18980411]
  53. Dyslexia. 2010 Aug;16(3):194-212 [PMID: 20680991]
  54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11850-7 [PMID: 11050219]
  55. Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;7(1):606 [PMID: 28377626]
  56. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):934-45 [PMID: 25860795]
  57. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):458-65 [PMID: 17983834]
  58. Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;28(6):723-732 [PMID: 28388275]
  59. Learn Mem. 2022 Oct 17;29(11):421-429 [PMID: 36253009]
  60. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Nov;185:107518 [PMID: 34508883]
  61. Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):468-480 [PMID: 36791783]
  62. Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Jul;67(2):147-162 [PMID: 27766563]
  63. Cogn Psychol. 2005 Feb;50(1):86-132 [PMID: 15556130]
  64. Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 3:833-860 [PMID: 29570837]
  65. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51 [PMID: 29890888]
  66. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;24:63-71 [PMID: 28182973]
  67. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e85316 [PMID: 24489658]
  68. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;76(10):1392-7 [PMID: 16170083]
  69. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):650-69 [PMID: 25314161]
  70. NPJ Sci Learn. 2020 Sep 28;5:14 [PMID: 33083007]
  71. Dev Psychol. 2019 Oct;55(10):2060-2076 [PMID: 31259568]
  72. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):3059-71 [PMID: 16708961]
  73. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Mar;147(3):328-353 [PMID: 29058939]
  74. Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 23;12(4): [PMID: 35447957]
  75. Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2): [PMID: 28256101]
  76. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):442-81 [PMID: 9697427]
  77. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2013 Jan 1;13(1):7-14 [PMID: 26290655]
  78. Percept Psychophys. 2006 Aug;68(6):1013-26 [PMID: 17153195]
  79. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1718-28 [PMID: 16407480]
  80. Cogn Psychol. 2016 Dec;91:24-62 [PMID: 27721103]

Grants

  1. R01 DC013315/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Male
Adult
Child
Female
Humans
Learning
Dyslexia
Reading
Speech Perception
Research Design
Auditory Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningdyslexiacategoryselectiveproceduraldeclarativemechanismsauditoryproposedRBdevelopmentstrategieschildrenmemorydeficitsadultsIIrelyacrossskillperformance=25femalesmalesdevelopinglearnedtemporalusingdeficitPURPOSE:DevelopmentalinvolveintactRecentresearchdomaindemonstratedInformation-IntegrationunaffectedRule-BasedhypothesistestingImportantlyalsochangedistinctdevelopmentaltrajectoriesunclearchildhoodinfluencecriticalspeechperceptionreadingMETHOD:examined7-12-year-oldnine16typicallycontrols1312Participantsnonspeechcategoriesspectrotemporalripplesoptimallyeitherattentionmodulationdimensionintegrationinformationspectraldimensionsstatisticallycomparedmixed-modelanalysesvarianceidentifieddecision-boundcomputationalmodelsRESULTS:foundapparentratherobservedpriorworkCONCLUSION:resultssuggestimportantimpactedthroughoutindividualsmaydevelopcompensatorypreservedifficultiesSUPPLEMENTALMATERIAL:https://doiorg/1023641/asha25148519AuditoryCategoryLearningChildrenDyslexia

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.