Enhancing misinformation correction: New variants and a combination of awareness training and counter-speech to mitigate belief perseverance bias.

Jana Siebert, Johannes Ulrich Siebert
Author Information
  1. Jana Siebert: Faculty of Arts, Department of Economic and Managerial Studies, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  2. Johannes Ulrich Siebert: Department of Business and Management, Management Center Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Belief perseverance bias refers to individuals' tendency to persevere in biased opinions even after the misinformation that initially shaped those opinions has been retracted. This study contributes to research on reducing the negative impact of misinformation by mitigating the belief perseverance bias. The study explores the previously proposed awareness-training and counter-speech debiasing techniques, further developing them by introducing new variants and combining them. We investigate their effectiveness in mitigating the belief perseverance bias after the retraction of misinformation related to a real-life issue in an experiment involving N = 876 individuals, of whom 364 exhibit belief perseverance bias. The effectiveness of the debiasing techniques is assessed by measuring the difference between the baseline opinions before exposure to misinformation and the opinions after exposure to a debiasing technique. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of the awareness-training and counter-speech debiasing techniques in mitigating the belief perseverance bias, finding no discernible differences in the effectiveness between the previously proposed and the new variants. Moreover, we observed that the combination of awareness training and counter-speech is more effective in mitigating the belief perseverance bias than the single debiasing techniques.

References

  1. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Dec;13(3):106-31 [PMID: 26173286]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1531-1546 [PMID: 28895452]
  3. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:327-351 [PMID: 27618943]
  4. Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1087-100 [PMID: 21156872]
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200145 [PMID: 33612006]
  6. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):570-8 [PMID: 21359617]
  7. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 19;6(1):57 [PMID: 34410513]
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Dec;43(12):1948-1961 [PMID: 28504531]
  9. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267463 [PMID: 35482715]
  10. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jan 29;29(1):33-52 [PMID: 35693388]
  11. Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):591-607 [PMID: 34967004]
  12. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Aug 26;5(1):41 [PMID: 32844338]
  13. Mem Cognit. 2014 Feb;42(2):292-304 [PMID: 24005789]
  14. PLoS One. 2023 Mar 8;18(3):e0282202 [PMID: 36888583]
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):62-74 [PMID: 26147670]
  16. R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 1;4(3):160802 [PMID: 28405366]

MeSH Term

Humans
Speech
Communication
Attitude
Bias

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0perseverancebiasbeliefmisinformationdebiasingopinionsmitigatingcounter-speechtechniqueseffectivenessstudyvariantspreviouslyproposedawareness-trainingnewexposurecombinationawarenesstrainingBeliefrefersindividuals'tendencyperseverebiasedeveninitiallyshapedretractedcontributesresearchreducingnegativeimpactexploresdevelopingintroducingcombininginvestigateretractionrelatedreal-lifeissueexperimentinvolvingN=876individuals364exhibitassessedmeasuringdifferencebaselinetechniqueconfirmedfindingdiscernibledifferencesMoreoverobservedeffectivesingleEnhancingcorrection:Newmitigate

Similar Articles

Cited By