Managing treatment failure in Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: current guidelines and future directions.

Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz, Helen Fifer, Jeffrey D Klausner
Author Information
  1. Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz: Division of Global Health Equity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: lallan-blitz@mgb.org.
  2. Helen Fifer: Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
  3. Jeffrey D Klausner: Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

Due to the continued emergence of resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotics, clinicians are increasingly more likely to encounter cases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure. The current international treatment guidelines offer few regimens for cases of N gonorrhoeae infection that do not respond to first-line therapy, and there are many complexities that should be considered with such regimens; these include regional variations in resistance to alternative agents, access to different antibiotics, and penetration of those antibiotics within different tissues. Further, such regimens do not account for the challenges of treating pharyngeal infections; many patients who have not responded to treatment with extended-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotics to date have had pharyngeal involvement. In addition, pharyngeal infections play a pivotal role in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance in N gonorrhoeae and are more difficult to treat than urogenital infections because of the unfavourable pharmacokinetics of cephalosporins in pharyngeal tissues. Here, we summarise the current guidelines, provide additional approaches and considerations for clinicians, and highlight knowledge gaps that should be addressed to ensure appropriate therapy in cases of treatment failure.

References

  1. Sex Transm Dis. 2023 Jul 1;50(7):395-401 [PMID: 36735907]
  2. J Infect Chemother. 2009 Apr;15(2):70-4 [PMID: 19396515]
  3. Euro Surveill. 2018 Jul;23(27): [PMID: 29991383]
  4. Euro Surveill. 2022 Jun;27(24): [PMID: 35713023]
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jul;56(7):3603-9 [PMID: 22547617]
  6. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 May 1;64(9):1268-1270 [PMID: 28034887]
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 May 17;66(5):e0010922 [PMID: 35491832]
  8. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Nov-Dec;21(6):345-52 [PMID: 7871449]
  9. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;56(11):1539-45 [PMID: 23408680]
  10. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Apr 13;76(5):1215-1220 [PMID: 33471098]
  11. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jul;27(3):587-613 [PMID: 24982323]
  12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1645-6 [PMID: 2817866]
  13. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 23;374(25):2504-6 [PMID: 27332921]
  14. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):276-278 [PMID: 32112753]
  15. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014 Jun;27(3):282-7 [PMID: 24685549]
  16. Euro Surveill. 2017 Oct;22(42): [PMID: 29067905]
  17. Euro Surveill. 2019 Mar;24(10): [PMID: 30862336]
  18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):1-9 [PMID: 28007229]
  19. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jun;69(6):1572-8 [PMID: 24468865]
  20. J Med Microbiol. 2009 May;58(Pt 5):683-687 [PMID: 19369534]
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):4339-41 [PMID: 27067334]
  22. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1877-1882 [PMID: 31712813]
  23. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):1858-60 [PMID: 22566592]
  24. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):706-717 [PMID: 35065063]
  25. Euro Surveill. 2022 Nov;27(46): [PMID: 36398578]
  26. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Sep;12(9):2307-2320 [PMID: 37751016]
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 1;67(4):504-512 [PMID: 29617982]
  28. Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2511-2520 [PMID: 31056291]
  29. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Apr;20 Suppl 1:S47-65 [PMID: 7795109]
  30. Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Oct 29;:956462420949126 [PMID: 33121366]
  31. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;24(4): [PMID: 29553335]
  32. Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Jan;31(1):4-15 [PMID: 31870237]
  33. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1835-1845 [PMID: 30403954]
  34. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Feb;29(2):298-302 [PMID: 2940965]
  35. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 1;62(11):1348-1355 [PMID: 26962074]
  36. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Nov;40(11):877-9 [PMID: 24113412]
  37. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 1;70(1):99-105 [PMID: 30838398]
  38. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187 [PMID: 34292926]
  39. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Apr 1;75(4):907-910 [PMID: 31899504]
  40. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):858-867 [PMID: 33444559]
  41. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):344-350 [PMID: 34994305]
  42. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Jan;2(1):33-42 [PMID: 15035007]
  43. Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):927-32 [PMID: 16199703]
  44. Sex Health. 2013 Nov;10(5):460-2 [PMID: 24028864]
  45. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Nov;46(11):743-747 [PMID: 31517767]
  46. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):207-212 [PMID: 31419483]
  47. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):318-327 [PMID: 29276051]
  48. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 21;15:364 [PMID: 26293005]
  49. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Oct;40(10):3596-601 [PMID: 12354851]
  50. Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Aug;92(5):347-9 [PMID: 26622046]
  51. Sex Transm Dis. 2021 Jun 1;48(6):385-392 [PMID: 33229966]
  52. Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Nov;93(7):467-471 [PMID: 28822976]
  53. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1997:37-58 [PMID: 31119616]
  54. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jun;68(6):1445-7 [PMID: 23390207]
  55. J Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 15;228(6):792-799 [PMID: 37462263]
  56. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):298-303 [PMID: 32766725]
  57. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;11(3): [PMID: 35326763]
  58. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;23(9):e332-e333 [PMID: 37549683]
  59. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Apr;15(4):587-91 [PMID: 464590]
  60. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3538-45 [PMID: 21576437]
  61. Sex Transm Infect. 2015 Jun;91(4):234-7 [PMID: 25911525]
  62. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1984 Sep;15(3):360-3 [PMID: 6441265]
  63. Euro Surveill. 2012 Jun 21;17(25): [PMID: 22748003]
  64. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar;56(3):1273-80 [PMID: 22155830]
  65. Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Jun;46(6):357-363 [PMID: 31095100]
  66. Future Microbiol. 2012 Dec;7(12):1401-22 [PMID: 23231489]
  67. Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-47 [PMID: 7709324]
  68. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;73(4):575-582 [PMID: 33513222]
  69. Sex Transm Dis. 2023 May 1;50(5):274-279 [PMID: 36630331]
  70. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Oct;65(10):2141-8 [PMID: 20693173]
  71. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0275721 [PMID: 35678576]

Grants

  1. R21 AI157817/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Gonorrhea
Treatment Failure
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Cephalosporins
Drug Resistance, Bacterial

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Cephalosporins

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentantibioticsgonorrhoeaepharyngealresistancecasesfailurecurrentguidelinesregimensinfectionsemergenceextended-spectrumcephalosporincliniciansNeisseriaNtherapymanydifferenttissuesDuecontinuedincreasinglylikelyencounterinternationalofferinfectionrespondfirst-linecomplexitiesconsideredincluderegionalvariationsalternativeagentsaccesspenetrationwithinaccountchallengestreatingpatientsrespondeddateinvolvementadditionplaypivotalrolespreadantimicrobialdifficulttreaturogenitalunfavourablepharmacokineticscephalosporinssummariseprovideadditionalapproachesconsiderationshighlightknowledgegapsaddressedensureappropriateManaginginfection:futuredirections

Similar Articles

Cited By