Data-driven disease progression model of Parkinson's disease and effect of sex and genetic variants.

Ryota Jin, Hideki Yoshioka, Hiromi Sato, Akihiro Hisaka
Author Information
  1. Ryota Jin: Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. ORCID
  2. Hideki Yoshioka: Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. ORCID
  3. Hiromi Sato: Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. ORCID
  4. Akihiro Hisaka: Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

As Parkinson's disease (PD) progresses, there are multiple biomarker changes, and sex and genetic variants may influence the rate of progression. Data-driven, long-term disease progression model analysis may provide precise knowledge of the relationships between these risk factors and progression and would allow for the selection of appropriate diagnosis and treatment according to disease progression. To construct a long-term disease progression model of PD based on multiple biomarkers and evaluate the effects of sex and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) mutations, a technique derived from the nonlinear mixed-effects model (Statistical Restoration of Fragmented Time course [SReFT]) was applied to datasets of patients provided by the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Four biomarkers, including the Unified PD Rating Scale, were used, and a covariate analysis was performed to investigate the effects of sex and LRRK2-related mutations. A model of disease progression over ~30 years was successfully developed using patient data with a median of 6 years. Covariate analysis suggested that female sex and LRRK2 G2019S mutations were associated with 21.6% and 25.4% significantly slower progression, respectively. LRRK2 rs76904798 mutation also tended to delay disease progression by 10.4% but the difference was not significant. In conclusion, a long-term PD progression model was successfully constructed using SReFT from relatively short-term individual patient observations and depicted nonlinear changes in relevant biomarkers and their covariates, including sex and genetic variants.

References

  1. Neurobiol Aging. 2014 May;35(5):1125-31 [PMID: 24355527]
  2. Mov Disord. 2014 Jul;29(8):1057-60 [PMID: 24903616]
  3. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1632-8 [PMID: 25649812]
  4. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Sep;79(3):241-57 [PMID: 16023764]
  5. J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jan;15(1):102-107 [PMID: 30618224]
  6. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 18;9(8): [PMID: 32824840]
  7. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):181-4 [PMID: 1564476]
  8. Ann Neurol. 2002 Mar;51(3):296-301 [PMID: 11891824]
  9. Mov Disord. 2004 Nov;19(11):1306-12 [PMID: 15390007]
  10. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;78(8):819-24 [PMID: 17098842]
  11. Mov Disord. 2019 Sep;34(9):1354-1364 [PMID: 31361367]
  12. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;107(3):553-562 [PMID: 31544231]
  13. Neurol Genet. 2019 Jul 09;5(4):e348 [PMID: 31404238]
  14. Neurosci Lett. 2013 Jan 4;532:44-8 [PMID: 23149132]
  15. Mov Disord. 2018 Oct;33(10):1601-1608 [PMID: 30145797]
  16. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70 [PMID: 19025984]
  17. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024 Apr;13(4):649-659 [PMID: 38369942]
  18. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601 [PMID: 26474316]
  19. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015 Jul;21(7):778-82 [PMID: 25962553]
  20. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):939-953 [PMID: 30287051]
  21. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2016 Oct;2(5):221-230 [PMID: 28936389]
  22. Neurodegener Dis. 2018;18(4):173-190 [PMID: 30089306]
  23. J Biopharm Stat. 2011 Jul;21(4):708-25 [PMID: 21516565]
  24. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;92(1):125-31 [PMID: 22617225]
  25. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2017 Mar 11;4(4):536-544 [PMID: 30363418]
  26. Eur J Med Chem. 2023 Aug 5;256:115475 [PMID: 37201428]
  27. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Feb;105(2):436-447 [PMID: 29951994]
  28. Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 11;9:560 [PMID: 30050494]
  29. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017 Aug;124(8):901-905 [PMID: 28150045]
  30. Pharm Res. 2022 Aug;39(8):1803-1815 [PMID: 35411507]
  31. Mov Disord. 2019 Jan;34(1):67-77 [PMID: 30468694]
  32. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):312-319 [PMID: 29309488]
  33. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Aug;75(2):85-94 [PMID: 15212851]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Parkinson Disease
Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2
Mutation
Biomarkers
Disease Progression

Chemicals

Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2
Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0progressiondiseasesexmodelPDParkinson'sgeneticvariantslong-termanalysisbiomarkersLRRK2mutationsmultiplechangesmayData-driveneffectsnonlinearincludingsuccessfullyusingpatient4%progressesbiomarkerinfluencerateprovidepreciseknowledgerelationshipsriskfactorsallowselectionappropriatediagnosistreatmentaccordingconstructbasedevaluateleucine-richrepeatkinase2techniquederivedmixed-effectsStatisticalRestorationFragmentedTimecourse[SReFT]applieddatasetspatientsprovidedProgressionMarkersInitiativeFourUnifiedRatingScaleusedcovariateperformedinvestigateLRRK2-related~30 yearsdevelopeddatamedian6 yearsCovariatesuggestedfemaleG2019Sassociated216%25significantlyslowerrespectivelyrs76904798mutationalsotendeddelay10differencesignificantconclusionconstructedSReFTrelativelyshort-termindividualobservationsdepictedrelevantcovariateseffect

Similar Articles

Cited By