Crisis and environmental governance decisions amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from European countries.

Iyad H M Ismail, Saleh F A Khatib, Alhamzah F Abbas, Mohd Noor Azli Ali Khan, Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Ayman Hassan Bazhair
Author Information
  1. Iyad H M Ismail: School of Business Management, University Utara Malaysia, Kedah 06010, Malaysia.
  2. Saleh F A Khatib: Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
  3. Alhamzah F Abbas: Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
  4. Mohd Noor Azli Ali Khan: Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor 81310, Malaysia.
  5. Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany: Accounting Department, Faculty of Business Administration College, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.
  6. Ayman Hassan Bazhair: Department of Economic and Finance, Faculty of Business Administration College, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis on environmental governance decisions within publicly listed European companies. It utilizes a comprehensive analysis of publicly available data regarding these firms and check the environmental governance practices during the pandemic, informed by risk society theory which describes modern societies marked by ongoing risks and uncertainties primarily stemming from technological and scientific advancements. The regression and robustness analysis has been performed on how companies have responded to the crisis, specifically in terms of their approaches to environmental sustainability and governance. Covid-19 has a significantly positive impact on environmental governance (EG), with a coefficient of 18.73 and a p-value of .000. Other variables like human development (HD), size, and free cash flow (FCF) positively affect EG, while corruption (Corrupt) and leverage (Lev) have a negative influence. Robust analysis confirms the negative impact of Covid-19 on EG, with a coefficient of 18.46 and a p-value below .01, consistent across different subsamples. However, it also underscores the challenges companies have encountered in upholding their sustainability efforts amid the crisis. In sum, this research offers valuable insights into how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected environmental governance decisions, with potential implications for policymakers, regulators, and business leaders striving to advance sustainability in the post-pandemic landscape.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020 Sep;90:102636 [PMID: 32834356]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11): [PMID: 32532012]
  3. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:188-192 [PMID: 32501304]
  4. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0252423 [PMID: 34129597]
  5. Econ Anal Policy. 2022 Jun;74:560-570 [PMID: 35281767]
  6. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(31):46438-46457 [PMID: 35499739]
  7. J Bus Res. 2020 Aug;116:176-182 [PMID: 32457556]
  8. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2016 Nov 1;41:399-423 [PMID: 32607083]
  9. Resour Policy. 2022 Aug;77:102760 [PMID: 36569596]
  10. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 Jan;164:105169 [PMID: 32982059]
  11. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101870 [PMID: 36569646]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Apr 11;114(15):E3013-E3021 [PMID: 28348238]
  13. Heliyon. 2020 Sep;6(9):e04965 [PMID: 32964165]
  14. Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Apr;81(4):109-15, 124 [PMID: 12687925]
  15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7156-61 [PMID: 22509036]
  16. Econ Model. 2020 Dec;93:112-124 [PMID: 32834335]
  17. J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100343 [PMID: 32427152]
  18. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2020 May;5:100078 [PMID: 32382727]
  19. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 10;747:141314 [PMID: 32795798]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15): [PMID: 34360341]
  21. Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102726 [PMID: 35185400]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17656-17666 [PMID: 32651281]
  23. Can J Public Health. 2021 Feb;112(1):36-37 [PMID: 33464555]
  24. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:284-289 [PMID: 32536736]
  25. Sociol Q. 2010;51(4):624-48 [PMID: 20939128]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0governanceenvironmentalCOVID-19pandemiccrisisdecisionscompaniesanalysissustainabilityEGinfluencepubliclyEuropeansocietytheoryCovid-19impactcoefficient18p-valuenegativestudyinvestigateswithinlistedutilizescomprehensiveavailabledataregardingfirmscheckpracticesinformedriskdescribesmodernsocietiesmarkedongoingrisksuncertaintiesprimarilystemmingtechnologicalscientificadvancementsregressionrobustnessperformedrespondedspecificallytermsapproachessignificantlypositive73000variableslikehumandevelopmentHDsizefreecashflowFCFpositivelyaffectcorruptionCorruptleverageLevRobustconfirms4601consistentacrossdifferentsubsamplesHoweveralsounderscoreschallengesencounteredupholdingeffortsamidsumresearchoffersvaluableinsightsaffectedpotentialimplicationspolicymakersregulatorsbusinessleadersstrivingadvancepost-pandemiclandscapeCrisisamidstpandemic:LessonscountriesCorporateEnvironmentalEuropeRisk

Similar Articles

Cited By