Planning for Program Evaluation Improves Implementation and Assessment.

Leslie E Tower, Julie Hicks Patrick
Author Information
  1. Leslie E Tower: WVU Women's Resource Center (WRC); School of Social Work, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. ORCID
  2. Julie Hicks Patrick: AGE-ADAR Scholars Program; West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. ORCID

Abstract

This article offers a general approach to plan and implement an educational program by illustrating the evaluation process and data from the AGE-ADAR Scholars Program. A well-designed program evaluation will also include a plan for stakeholder dissemination. We adapted a framework from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention which includes hard and soft outcomes. Hard outcomes include improved academic metrics, including test scores and graduation rates. Soft outcomes include changes in students' attitudes, particularly those related to reduced ageism as well as readiness to pursue graduate study. While our hard and soft outcomes suggest that the ADAR program is effective in increasing interest in rural health disparities and aging research, we are hopeful that our impact will continue to enrich the lives of our students and the communities in which they live and work.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Humans
Program Evaluation
Program Development
Aging
Ageism

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0outcomesprogramincludeplanevaluationProgramwillhardsoftADARarticleoffersgeneralapproachimplementeducationalillustratingprocessdataAGE-ADARScholarswell-designedalsostakeholderdisseminationadaptedframeworkCentersDiseaseControlPreventionincludesHardimprovedacademicmetricsincludingtestscoresgraduationratesSoftchangesstudents'attitudesparticularlyrelatedreducedageismwellreadinesspursuegraduatestudysuggesteffectiveincreasinginterestruralhealthdisparitiesagingresearchhopefulimpactcontinueenrichlivesstudentscommunitiesliveworkPlanningEvaluationImprovesImplementationAssessmentMSTEMgerontologiststraining

Similar Articles

Cited By