A multi-center distributed learning approach for Parkinson's disease classification using the traveling model paradigm.

Raissa Souza, Emma A M Stanley, Milton Camacho, Richard Camicioli, Oury Monchi, Zahinoor Ismail, Matthias Wilms, Nils D Forkert
Author Information
  1. Raissa Souza: Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  2. Emma A M Stanley: Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  3. Milton Camacho: Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  4. Richard Camicioli: Department of Medicine (Neurology), Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  5. Oury Monchi: Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  6. Zahinoor Ismail: Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  7. Matthias Wilms: Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  8. Nils D Forkert: Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Abstract

Distributed learning is a promising alternative to central learning for machine learning (ML) model training, overcoming data-sharing problems in healthcare. Previous studies exploring federated learning (FL) or the traveling model (TM) setup for medical image-based disease classification often relied on large databases with a limited number of centers or simulated artificial centers, raising doubts about real-world applicability. This study develops and evaluates a convolution neural network (CNN) for Parkinson's disease classification using data acquired by 83 diverse real centers around the world, mostly contributing small training samples. Our approach specifically makes use of the TM setup, which has proven effective in scenarios with limited data availability but has never been used for image-based disease classification. Our findings reveal that TM is effective for training CNN models, even in complex real-world scenarios with variable data distributions. After sufficient training cycles, the TM-trained CNN matches or slightly surpasses the performance of the centrally trained counterpart (AUROC of 83% vs. 80%). Our study highlights, for the first time, the effectiveness of TM in 3D medical image classification, especially in scenarios with limited training samples and heterogeneous distributed data. These insights are relevant for situations where ML models are supposed to be trained using data from small or remote medical centers, and rare diseases with sparse cases. The simplicity of this approach enables a broad application to many deep learning tasks, enhancing its clinical utility across various contexts and medical facilities.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):1925-1933 [PMID: 37669158]
  2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):456-465 [PMID: 30635988]
  3. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Apr;27(4):685-91 [PMID: 18302232]
  4. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Feb;11(2):852-857 [PMID: 33532283]
  5. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2022 Feb-Mar;12037: [PMID: 36304738]
  6. Mov Disord. 2019 Jun;34(6):893-902 [PMID: 30924964]
  7. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):700-708 [PMID: 32196092]
  8. Data Brief. 2017 Apr 15;12:370-379 [PMID: 28491942]
  9. Brain. 2014 Apr;137(Pt 4):1120-9 [PMID: 24613932]
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):112-119 [PMID: 36287916]
  11. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;38:103405 [PMID: 37079936]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Apr;3(4):128-135 [PMID: 10322466]
  13. Sci Data. 2018 Jul 17;5:180134 [PMID: 30015807]
  14. Med Image Anal. 2020 Oct;65:101765 [PMID: 32679533]
  15. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):945-954 [PMID: 29617797]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 12;15(7): [PMID: 30002291]
  17. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 4;12(1):1953 [PMID: 35121774]
  18. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 May 1;172(5):476-481 [PMID: 29554172]
  19. Can J Neurol Sci. 2007 Feb;34(1):56-61 [PMID: 17352348]
  20. Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 14;12:648548 [PMID: 33935946]
  21. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188196 [PMID: 29182621]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 28;114(13):3521-3526 [PMID: 28292907]
  23. PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779 [PMID: 25826379]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0learningtrainingdiseaseclassificationdatamodelTMmedicalcenterstravelinglimitedCNNParkinson'susingapproachscenariosdistributedMLfederatedsetupimage-basedreal-worldstudysmallsampleseffectivemodelstrainedmulti-centerDistributedpromisingalternativecentralmachineovercomingdata-sharingproblemshealthcarePreviousstudiesexploringFLoftenreliedlargedatabasesnumbersimulatedartificialraisingdoubtsapplicabilitydevelopsevaluatesconvolutionneuralnetworkacquired83diverserealaroundworldmostlycontributingspecificallymakesuseprovenavailabilityneverusedfindingsrevealevencomplexvariabledistributionssufficientcyclesTM-trainedmatchesslightlysurpassesperformancecentrallycounterpartAUROC83%vs80%highlightsfirsttimeeffectiveness3Dimageespeciallyheterogeneousinsightsrelevantsituationssupposedremoterarediseasessparsecasessimplicityenablesbroadapplicationmanydeeptasksenhancingclinicalutilityacrossvariouscontextsfacilitiesparadigm

Similar Articles

Cited By