Clinical trials landscape in a lower-middle-income country (Pakistan).

Hassan Mumtaz, Syed Muhammad Ali Haider, Fnu Neha, Muhammad Saqib, Abdullah Nadeem, Zoha Seikha
Author Information
  1. Hassan Mumtaz: Clinical Research Associate, Maroof International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  2. Syed Muhammad Ali Haider: BMY Health, Lahore, Pakistan.
  3. Fnu Neha: Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, Sukkur, Pakistan.
  4. Muhammad Saqib: Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan. ORCID
  5. Abdullah Nadeem: Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  6. Zoha Seikha: Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Abstract

In recent times, there have been calls from within the developing nations for increased ownership by governmental research bodies and universities of the priority research setting and research that aligns with national health strategies. This is a review paper of the studies that have been published on clinical trials in developing countries, with a focus mainly on Pakistan. The literature review used online databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and ClinicalTrials.gov trial registries to search for clinical trials conducted in Pakistan between January 2000 and December 2022 and analyzed. The results revealed that clinical research in Pakistan is hindered by a number of barriers, including a lack of funding, skilled personnel, and regulatory issues. Lack of funding is a common obstacle, and the majority of funding for clinical trials originates from Western countries or pharmaceutical companies established in the West. In conclusion, clinical studies in developing countries, especially in Pakistan, are hindered by a plethora of barriers, and to improve the current state, increasing funding, streamlining ethical approval procedures, simplifying regulatory systems, addressing cultural and religious concerns, and participating in global efforts to bridge the gap in health-based research are crucial.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 28;13(2):e0192413 [PMID: 29489839]
  2. JAMA. 2003 Sep 24;290(12):1624-32 [PMID: 14506122]
  3. Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Jun 13;16:1411 [PMID: 36072231]
  4. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Jul-Sep;34(3):468-473 [PMID: 36377158]
  5. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 May-Jun;7(3):313-23 [PMID: 10833169]
  6. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Jun;27(2):215-21 [PMID: 15820994]
  7. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Mar 22;17(1):37 [PMID: 29566721]
  8. Trials. 2022 May 7;23(1):374 [PMID: 35526046]
  9. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e711-e720 [PMID: 33865476]
  10. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001228 [PMID: 22719228]
  11. Ochsner J. 2019 Winter;19(4):294-295 [PMID: 31903050]
  12. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021 Dec 23;13(1):149 [PMID: 34949227]
  13. Public Health Rep. 2016 May-Jun;131(3):396-403 [PMID: 27252559]
  14. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018 Jul;68(7):1079-1083 [PMID: 30317306]
  15. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20152800 [PMID: 26812926]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PakistanresearchclinicaldevelopingtrialsfundingcountriesClinicalreviewstudiestrialhinderedbarriersregulatorycountryrecenttimescallswithinnationsincreasedownershipgovernmentalbodiesuniversitiesprioritysettingalignsnationalhealthstrategiespaperpublishedfocusmainlyliteratureusedonlinedatabasesPubMedScopusGoogleScholarWorldHealthOrganizationWHOInternationalTrialsRegistryPlatformICTRPClinicalTrialsgovregistriessearchconductedJanuary2000December2022analyzedresultsrevealednumberincludinglackskilledpersonnelissuesLackcommonobstaclemajorityoriginatesWesternpharmaceuticalcompaniesestablishedWestconclusionespeciallyplethoraimprovecurrentstateincreasingstreamliningethicalapprovalproceduressimplifyingsystemsaddressingculturalreligiousconcernsparticipatingglobaleffortsbridgegaphealth-basedcruciallandscapelower-middle-incomeoverviews

Similar Articles

Cited By