Determination of the Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor's Positive Allosteric Modulator Binding Site through Mutagenesis Studies.

Hayley M Green, Daniel M J Fellner, David B Finlay, Daniel P Furkert, Michelle Glass
Author Information
  1. Hayley M Green: Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
  2. Daniel M J Fellner: School of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  3. David B Finlay: Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. ORCID
  4. Daniel P Furkert: School of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. ORCID
  5. Michelle Glass: Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.

Abstract

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB) offer potential therapeutic advantages in the treatment of neuropathic pain and addiction by avoiding the adverse effects associated with orthosteric CB activation. Here, molecular modeling and mutagenesis were used to identify residues central to PAM activity at CB. Six putative allosteric binding sites were identified in silico, including novel sites previously associated with cholesterol binding, and key residues within each site were mutated to alanine. The recently determined ZCZ011 binding site was found to be essential for allosteric agonism, as GAT228, GAT229 and ZCZ011 all increased wild-type G protein dissociation in the absence of an orthosteric ligand; activity that was abolished in mutants F191A and I169A. PAM activity was demonstrated for ZCZ011 in the presence of the orthosteric ligand CP55940, which was only abolished in I169A. In contrast, the PAM activity of GAT229 was reduced for mutants R220A, L404A, F191A and I169A. This indicates that allosteric modulation may represent the net effect of binding at multiple sites, and that allosteric agonism is likely to be mediated via the ZCZ011 site. This study underlines the need for detailed understanding of ligand receptor interactions in the search for pure CB allosteric modulators.

Keywords

References

  1. ACS Omega. 2022 Oct 14;7(42):37873-37884 [PMID: 36312415]
  2. Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;161(6):1276-90 [PMID: 20977467]
  3. J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Feb;49(2):377-89 [PMID: 19434839]
  4. Science. 2014 Jan 3;343(6166):94-8 [PMID: 24385629]
  5. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 22;5(12):1279-1291 [PMID: 36524007]
  6. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020 Apr 28;13:54 [PMID: 32410959]
  7. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007 Sep;5(3):149-56 [PMID: 19305797]
  8. J Med Chem. 2019 May 23;62(10):5049-5062 [PMID: 31050898]
  9. Neuropharmacology. 2021 Jun 1;190:108553 [PMID: 33845076]
  10. Neuropharmacology. 2019 Jun;151:1-12 [PMID: 30940536]
  11. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 17;21(20): [PMID: 33080916]
  12. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Aug;12(8):630-44 [PMID: 23903222]
  13. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Oct;33(8):582-590 [PMID: 28719234]
  14. Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):923-30 [PMID: 18776886]
  15. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;26(1):151-156 [PMID: 22004129]
  16. Nat Chem Biol. 2022 Aug;18(8):831-840 [PMID: 35637350]
  17. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2022 Jan;380(1):1-14 [PMID: 34625464]
  18. J Med Chem. 2019 Mar 28;62(6):2851-2893 [PMID: 30295477]
  19. Br J Pharmacol. 2023 Feb;180(3):369-382 [PMID: 36250246]
  20. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;153(2):199-215 [PMID: 17828291]
  21. Nat Chem Biol. 2019 Dec;15(12):1199-1205 [PMID: 31659318]
  22. Front Immunol. 2020 Apr 22;11:720 [PMID: 32391018]
  23. Bioorg Med Chem. 2021 Nov 15;50:116421 [PMID: 34634617]
  24. Biochem Soc Trans. 2020 Feb 28;48(1):25-37 [PMID: 31872229]
  25. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Dec;40(13):2948-59 [PMID: 26052038]
  26. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2007 Feb;69(2):146-8 [PMID: 17381729]
  27. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 15;84(10):722-733 [PMID: 28823711]
  28. Nat Neurosci. 2022 Sep;25(9):1179-1190 [PMID: 35982154]
  29. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Jun 21;8(6):1188-1203 [PMID: 28103441]
  30. J Med Chem. 2020 Jan 23;63(2):542-568 [PMID: 31756109]
  31. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2022 Jan 24;12:121-130 [PMID: 35128516]
  32. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019 Jul 10;10(8):1216-1221 [PMID: 31413808]
  33. Cell. 2020 Feb 20;180(4):655-665.e18 [PMID: 32004463]
  34. Br J Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;174(15):2545-2562 [PMID: 28516479]
  35. Br J Pharmacol. 2022 May;179(10):2223-2239 [PMID: 34811740]
  36. Br J Pharmacol. 2009 Apr;156(7):1178-84 [PMID: 19226282]

Grants

  1. 22-UOO-205/Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0allostericbindingZCZ011CBactivitysiteCB1receptororthostericPAMsitesagonismGAT229ligandI169APositivemodulatorsassociatedresiduesGAT228abolishedmutantsF191AmodulationCannabinoidPAMscannabinoidofferpotentialtherapeuticadvantagestreatmentneuropathicpainaddictionavoidingadverseeffectsactivationmolecularmodelingmutagenesisusedidentifycentralSixputativeidentifiedsilicoincludingnovelpreviouslycholesterolkeywithinmutatedalaninerecentlydeterminedfoundessentialincreasedwild-typeGproteindissociationabsencedemonstratedpresenceCP55940contrastreducedR220AL404AindicatesmayrepresentneteffectmultiplelikelymediatedviastudyunderlinesneeddetailedunderstandinginteractionssearchpureDeterminationReceptor'sAllostericModulatorBindingSiteMutagenesisStudies

Similar Articles

Cited By