The relationship between cumulative ecological risk and health risk behaviors among Chinese adolescents.

Jiaojiao Wang, Yang Xie, Yi Zhang, Huiqiong Xu, Xianglin Zhang, Yuhui Wan, Fangbiao Tao
Author Information
  1. Jiaojiao Wang: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  2. Yang Xie: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  3. Yi Zhang: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  4. Huiqiong Xu: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  5. Xianglin Zhang: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  6. Yuhui Wan: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
  7. Fangbiao Tao: Department of Maternal, Child & Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China. taofangbiao@126.com.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between cumulative ecological risk and individual risky behavior and multiple forms of aggregated behaviors among adolescents, and examine the gender differences.
METHODS: A large-scale, nationally representative, and students-based investigation was conducted in rural and urban areas of eight provinces in China from October to December 2021. A total of 22 868 adolescents with an average age of 14.64 years completely standardized questionnaire in which the sociodemographic characteristics, socio-ecological risk factors and risky behaviors were used to analyze.
RESULTS: Of included students, 48.4% encountered the high level of social-ecological risk. The prevalence of breakfast intake not daily, alcohol use (AU), smoking, physical inactivity, prolonged screen time (ST) on weekdays and weekends, suicidal ideation, suicidal plan, suicidal attempt, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) was 41.0%, 11.9%, 3.4%, 61.9%, 15.1%, 51.1%, 27.7%, 13.9%, 6.5% and 27.0% respectively. 22.2% of participants engaged in high-risk behaviors. All were significantly influences of increased cumulative ecological risk on individual behavior and low-risk clustering behaviors separately. The odds ratio of breakfast intake not daily, AU, smoking, physical inactivity, prolonged ST in weekday and weekend, suicidal ideation, suicidal plan, suicidal attempt, and NSSI for the adjusted model in low versus high level of cumulative ecological risk was respectively significant in both boy and girls, and the ratio of odds ratios (ROR) was separately 0.95 (p = 0.228), 0.67 (p < 0.001), 0.44 (p < 0.001), 0.60 (p < 0.001), 0.78 (p = 0.001), 0.83 (p = 0.001), 0.80 (p = 0.001), 0.83 (p = 0.022), 0.71 (p = 0.005), 0.75 (p = 0.001). Girls encountering a high level of cumulative ecological risk were more likely to engage in multiple forms of clustering risky behaviors than boys (RORs: 0.77, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Research and effective inventions at the social-ecological environment, based on the view of cumulative risk, are needed to promote the healthy development of behaviors in adolescence, and pay more attention to decreasing the occurrence of risky behaviours in girls than boys.

Keywords

References

  1. J Affect Disord. 2019 Aug 1;255:116-126 [PMID: 31150941]
  2. Nutr Hosp. 2021 Apr 19;38(2):396-409 [PMID: 33724048]
  3. J Sch Nurs. 2013 Apr;29(2):113-22 [PMID: 23008186]
  4. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242186 [PMID: 33180831]
  5. Psychol Methods. 2003 Sep;8(3):338-63 [PMID: 14596495]
  6. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34 Suppl 1:i20-30 [PMID: 22363027]
  7. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 18;12:753695 [PMID: 34867541]
  8. J Adolesc Health. 1991 Dec;12(8):597-605 [PMID: 1799569]
  9. J Child Fam Stud. 2017 May;26(5):1266-1273 [PMID: 28970737]
  10. Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;139(6):1342-96 [PMID: 23566018]
  11. J Adolesc Health. 2003 Dec;33(6):436-57 [PMID: 14642706]
  12. SSM Popul Health. 2020 Dec 10;13:100707 [PMID: 33365380]
  13. J Youth Adolesc. 2011 Feb;40(2):158-73 [PMID: 20213481]
  14. Front Public Health. 2018 May 07;6:135 [PMID: 29868543]
  15. J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Sep 15;62(3):E689-E703 [PMID: 34909497]
  16. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 30;15:100225 [PMID: 34528007]
  17. BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):1283 [PMID: 30463537]
  18. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34 Suppl 1:i3-10 [PMID: 22363028]
  19. J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl:22-8 [PMID: 18237321]
  20. J Rural Health. 2020 Jan;36(1):65-76 [PMID: 31411774]
  21. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Oct;60 Spec No 2:130-4 [PMID: 16251584]
  22. J Behav Med. 2020 Dec;43(6):1002-1013 [PMID: 32323118]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 30;16(19): [PMID: 31574957]
  24. Health Educ Behav. 2010 Feb;37(1):97-114 [PMID: 20130302]
  25. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S54-66 [PMID: 20943583]
  26. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;42(4):386-405 [PMID: 12649626]
  27. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1996 Nov;51(6):S319-28 [PMID: 8931631]
  28. J Behav Med. 2017 Feb;40(1):194-202 [PMID: 27785652]
  29. BMC Pediatr. 2021 Jan 11;21(1):31 [PMID: 33430827]
  30. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 29;16:657 [PMID: 27473458]
  31. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Mar 1;93(3):217-26 [PMID: 17980975]
  32. J Sch Health. 2021 Sep;91(9):683-696 [PMID: 34278580]
  33. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Mar;153(3):226-34 [PMID: 10086398]
  34. Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Aug 26;34(4):e100558 [PMID: 34557644]
  35. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:51-8 [PMID: 15251873]
  36. Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(10):1663-1678 [PMID: 31046537]
  37. Health Educ Behav. 2013 Aug;40(4):384-91 [PMID: 22561377]
  38. J Epidemiol. 2014;24(5):397-403 [PMID: 24930472]

Grants

  1. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  5. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  6. 82073578/National Natural Science Foundation of China

MeSH Term

Male
Female
Humans
Adolescent
Health Risk Behaviors
Suicide, Attempted
Suicidal Ideation
Self-Injurious Behavior
Risk Factors
China
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0risk0p = 0001behaviorscumulativeecologicalsuicidalriskybehavioradolescentshighlevel9%p < 0relationshipindividualmultipleformsamong224%social-ecologicalbreakfastintakedailyAUsmokingphysicalinactivityprolongedSTideationplanattemptNSSI0%1%27respectivelyclusteringseparatelyoddsratiogirls83boysOBJECTIVES:exploreaggregatedexaminegenderdifferencesMETHODS:large-scalenationallyrepresentativestudents-basedinvestigationconductedruralurbanareaseightprovincesChinaOctoberDecember2021total868averageage1464 yearscompletelystandardizedquestionnairesociodemographiccharacteristicssocio-ecologicalfactorsusedanalyzeRESULTS:includedstudents48encounteredprevalencealcoholusescreentimeweekdaysweekendsnon-suicidalself-injury411136115517%1365%2%participantsengagedhigh-risksignificantlyinfluencesincreasedlow-riskweekdayweekendadjustedmodellowversussignificantboyratiosROR9522867446078800227100575GirlsencounteringlikelyengageRORs:77CONCLUSIONS:ResearcheffectiveinventionsenvironmentbasedviewneededpromotehealthydevelopmentadolescencepayattentiondecreasingoccurrencebehaviourshealthChineseAdolescentCumulativeHealth

Similar Articles

Cited By