OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Veterinary world
Jan, 2024;17 (1): 26-36.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence and relationships among sequence types isolated from humans, animals, and the environment.

Sa-Ngob Laklaeng, Doan Hoang Phu, Jirarat Songsri, Sueptrakool Wisessombat, Wanida Mala, Wilaiwan Senghoi, Preeda Phothaworn, Manit Nuinoon, Tuempong Wongtawan, Wiyada Kwanhian Klangbud
Author Information
  1. Sa-Ngob Laklaeng: College of Graduate Studies, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  2. Doan Hoang Phu: College of Graduate Studies, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  3. Jirarat Songsri: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  4. Sueptrakool Wisessombat: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  5. Wanida Mala: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  6. Wilaiwan Senghoi: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  7. Preeda Phothaworn: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  8. Manit Nuinoon: Department of Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  9. Tuempong Wongtawan: Akkhraratchakumari Veterinary College, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
  10. Wiyada Kwanhian Klangbud: Center of Excellence in Research for Melioidosis and Microorganisms, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
PMID: 38406370 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.26-36

Abstract

Background and Aim: , a highly pathogenic bacterium responsible for melioidosis, exhibits ecological ubiquity and thrives within soil and water reservoirs, posing significant infection risks to humans and animals through direct contact. The aim of this study was to elucidate the genetic diversity and prevalence patterns of sequence types (STs) across a global spectrum and to understand the relationships between strains isolated from different sources.
Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in this study. Extensive research was carried out across three comprehensive databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect with data collected from 1924 to 2023.
Results: A total of 40 carefully selected articles contributed 2737 isolates attributed to 729 distinct STs and were incorporated into the systematic review. Among these, ST46 emerged as the most prominent, featuring in 35% of the articles and demonstrating a dominant prevalence, particularly within Southeast Asia. Moreover, ST51 consistently appeared across human, animal, and environmental studies. Subsequently, we performed a meta-analysis, focusing on nine specific STs: ST46, ST51, ST54, ST70, ST84, ST109, ST289, ST325, and ST376. Surprisingly, no statistically significant differences in their pooled prevalence proportions were observed across these compartments for ST46, ST70, ST289, ST325, and ST376 (all p > 0.69). Conversely, the remaining STs, including ST51, ST54, ST84, and ST109, displayed notable variations in their prevalence among the three domains (all p < 0.04). Notably, the pooled prevalence of ST51 in animals and environmental samples surpassed that found in human isolates (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the intricate relationships between STs and their sources and contributes significantly to our understanding of diversity within the One Health framework.

Keywords

Burkholderia pseudomallei One Health melioidosis meta-analysis sequence type systematic review

References

  1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Feb;94(2):292-8 [PMID: 26621560]
  2. One Health. 2022 Nov 19;15:100465 [PMID: 36561710]
  3. Microb Genom. 2021 Nov;7(11): [PMID: 34762026]
  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jun;80(11):3463-8 [PMID: 24657869]
  5. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Dec 28;14(12):e0008979 [PMID: 33370273]
  6. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):147-53 [PMID: 26317388]
  7. Acta Trop. 2021 Feb;214:105784 [PMID: 33296681]
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Aug;51(8):2520-5 [PMID: 23698533]
  9. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;2(3):312-6 [PMID: 10383857]
  10. Nat Microbiol. 2017 Jan 23;2:16263 [PMID: 28112723]
  11. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;14(7):e2 [PMID: 18598617]
  12. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Nov 30;4(11):e900 [PMID: 21152057]
  13. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 Jul;23(7):1133-1138 [PMID: 28628442]
  14. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16260 [PMID: 33004984]
  15. Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Oct 08;147:e22 [PMID: 30293543]
  16. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):5 [PMID: 29291714]
  17. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Feb;18(2):325-7 [PMID: 22304782]
  18. Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Jul;144(9):1917-23 [PMID: 26744829]
  19. Microb Genom. 2021 Feb;7(2): [PMID: 33565959]
  20. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2021 Jan 28;10(4): [PMID: 33509986]
  21. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):68-72 [PMID: 26526925]
  22. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 6;8(1):8674 [PMID: 29875361]
  23. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Oct 5;95(4):760-764 [PMID: 27430537]
  24. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):655-658 [PMID: 33496648]
  25. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 04;3(8):e496 [PMID: 19652701]
  26. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Dec 1;15(12):e0009917 [PMID: 34851950]
  27. Front Microbiol. 2020 May 07;11:778 [PMID: 32457710]
  28. Genome Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):129-41 [PMID: 25236617]
  29. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):162-6 [PMID: 24145517]
  30. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2015 Sep 09;6(1):41-7 [PMID: 26417404]
  31. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 16;16:333 [PMID: 27423906]
  32. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Oct;105(10):598-600 [PMID: 21764093]
  33. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Nov 12;12(11):e0006915 [PMID: 30418974]
  34. Health Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 27;3(3):e178 [PMID: 32728636]
  35. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;77(20):7243-6 [PMID: 21873480]
  36. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 23;5(3): [PMID: 32717859]
  37. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 19;11(12):e0168331 [PMID: 27992477]
  38. PLoS Pathog. 2022 Jun 23;18(6):e1010537 [PMID: 35737670]
  39. mSphere. 2021 Feb 3;6(1): [PMID: 33536328]
  40. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019 Aug 15;8(33): [PMID: 31416870]
  41. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):1035-44 [PMID: 22970946]
  42. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e18343 [PMID: 21483841]
  43. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;17(7):1283-5 [PMID: 21762588]
  44. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 27;12(6):e0006558 [PMID: 29949580]
  45. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;3(1): [PMID: 29780897]
  46. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Apr;18(2):383-416 [PMID: 15831829]
  47. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Jul;85(1):121-3 [PMID: 21734136]
  48. Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 14;7(1): [PMID: 31947512]
  49. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 5;13(11):e0206845 [PMID: 30395628]
  50. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Nov 21;82(24):7086-7092 [PMID: 27694236]
  51. Biomed Rep. 2016 Dec;5(6):766-770 [PMID: 28105344]
  52. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr;4(4):272-82 [PMID: 16541135]
  53. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Apr;53(4):1144-8 [PMID: 25631791]
  54. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):1208-1211 [PMID: 27001759]
  55. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5477-83 [PMID: 15583269]
  56. Microb Genom. 2017 Jun 13;3(8):e000117 [PMID: 29026657]
  57. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;551:129-40 [PMID: 19521872]
  58. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 May 31;4(2): [PMID: 31159338]
  59. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;44(8):2951-62 [PMID: 16891516]
  60. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jun 10;9(6):e0003834 [PMID: 26061639]
  61. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245175 [PMID: 33411797]
  62. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020 Mar 11;33(2): [PMID: 32161067]
  63. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Feb 01;4:17107 [PMID: 29388572]
  64. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Apr;23(8):7828-39 [PMID: 26758304]
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0prevalencesystematicreviewmeta-analysisSTsacrossST51withinanimalsstudysequencerelationshipsST46p0melioidosissignificanthumansdiversitytypesglobalisolatedsourcesperformedthreeincludingarticlesisolateshumanenvironmentalST54ST70ST84ST109ST289ST325ST376pooledamong<OneHealthBackgroundAim:highlypathogenicbacteriumresponsibleexhibitsecologicalubiquitythrivessoilwaterreservoirsposinginfectionrisksdirectcontactaimelucidategeneticpatternsspectrumunderstandstrainsdifferentMaterialsMethods:ExtensiveresearchcarriedcomprehensivedatabasesPubMedScopusScienceDirectdatacollected19242023Results:total40carefullyselectedcontributed2737attributed729distinctincorporatedAmongemergedprominentfeaturing35%demonstratingdominantparticularlySoutheastAsiaMoreoverconsistentlyappearedanimalstudiesSubsequentlyfocusingninespecificSTs:Surprisinglystatisticallydifferencesproportionsobservedcompartments>69Converselyremainingdisplayednotablevariationsdomains04Notablysamplessurpassedfound01Conclusion:bestknowledgefirstinvestigateintricatecontributessignificantlyunderstandingframeworkenvironmentBurkholderiapseudomalleitype

Similar Articles

Cited By