Relatedness coefficients and their applications for triplets and quartets of genetic markers.

Kermit Ritland
Author Information
  1. Kermit Ritland: Biodiversity Research Center, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Abstract

Relatedness coefficients which seek the identity-by-descent of genetic markers are described. The markers are in groups of two, three or four, and if four, can consist of two pairs. It is essential to use cumulants (not moments) for four-marker-gene probabilities, as the covariance of homozygosity, used in four-marker applications, can only be described with cumulants. A covariance of homozygosity between pairs of markers arises when populations follow a mixture distribution. Also, the probability of four markers all identical-by-descent equals the normalized fourth cumulant. In this article, a "genetic marker" generally represents either a gene locus or an allele at a locus. Applications of three marker coefficients mainly involve conditional regression, and applications of four marker coefficients can involve identity disequilibrium. Estimation of relatedness using genetic marker data is discussed. However, three- and four-marker estimators suffer from statistical and numerical problems, including higher statistical variance, complexity of estimation formula, and singularity at some intermediate allele frequencies.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Comput Neurosci. 2010 Jul 02;4: [PMID: 20725510]
  2. J Math Biol. 1991;30(2):199-213 [PMID: 1765739]
  3. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 29;360(1459):1379-85 [PMID: 16048781]
  4. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):913-41 [PMID: 7851785]
  5. Genet Res. 2001 Feb;77(1):67-81 [PMID: 11279832]
  6. Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;33(3):266-74 [PMID: 19025785]
  7. Ann Hum Genet. 1981 Jul;45(3):299-305 [PMID: 7305283]
  8. Mol Ecol. 2000 Sep;9(9):1195-204 [PMID: 10972759]
  9. Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):109-17 [PMID: 8086594]
  10. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Oct;8(2):117-26 [PMID: 1198348]
  11. Theor Popul Biol. 2009 Jun;75(4):312-9 [PMID: 19345237]
  12. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):783-93 [PMID: 3428575]
  13. Theor Popul Biol. 1971 Dec;2(4):507-24 [PMID: 5162702]
  14. Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):258-275 [PMID: 28568555]
  15. Genetics. 2001 Feb;157(2):911-25 [PMID: 11157007]
  16. Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:597-621 [PMID: 7893141]
  17. Genet Res. 1980 Oct;36(2):181-97 [PMID: 7461452]
  18. J Evol Biol. 2014 Mar;27(3):518-30 [PMID: 24444019]
  19. Bioinformatics. 2019 Mar 15;35(6):1002-1008 [PMID: 30165566]
  20. Genetics. 2017 May;206(1):105-118 [PMID: 28341647]
  21. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1988;5(4):261-79 [PMID: 3241098]
  22. Ann Hum Genet. 2015 Jul;79(4):275-81 [PMID: 25907303]
  23. Genetics. 2017 Aug;206(4):2085-2103 [PMID: 28550018]
  24. G3 (Bethesda). 2018 Oct 3;8(10):3231-3245 [PMID: 30068523]
  25. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:617-33 [PMID: 22994355]

Grants

  1. /NSERC

MeSH Term

Genetic Markers
Gene Frequency
Alleles
Probability
Homozygote
Models, Genetic
Genetics, Population

Chemicals

Genetic Markers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0markerscoefficientsgeneticfourcancumulantsapplicationsmarkerRelatednessdescribedtwothreepairsmomentscovariancehomozygosityfour-markerlocusalleleinvolvestatisticalgeneticsseekidentity-by-descentgroupsconsistessentialusefour-marker-geneprobabilitiesusedarisespopulationsfollowmixturedistributionAlsoprobabilityidentical-by-descentequalsnormalizedfourthcumulantarticle"geneticmarker"generallyrepresentseithergeneApplicationsmainlyconditionalregressionidentitydisequilibriumEstimationrelatednessusingdatadiscussedHoweverthree-estimatorssuffernumericalproblemsincludinghighervariancecomplexityestimationformulasingularityintermediatefrequenciestripletsquartetsinbreedingpopulationquantitativerelationship

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.