Priming congruence and COVID-19 vaccination intention: a mediation analysis.

Lubomir Lamy, Jacques Fischer-Lokou, Nicolas Guéguen, Jérôme Guegan
Author Information
  1. Lubomir Lamy: Paris Cité University, Paris, France. ORCID
  2. Jacques Fischer-Lokou: Southern Brittany University, Rennes, France. ORCID
  3. Nicolas Guéguen: Southern Brittany University, Rennes, France. ORCID
  4. Jérôme Guegan: Paris Cité University, Paris, France. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study took place at the height of the fifth wave of COVID-19 in France, coinciding with stigmatizing communication toward the unvaccinated. We hypothesized that adherence to this communication would facilitate or inhibit the effects of priming on vaccination intention, depending on whether the priming included a dimension of connection to others.
PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: In a convenience online French sample ( = 1800, age = 26.30), vaccination intention was asked after love priming, no love/prejudice priming, materialism priming, or a control condition. Participants also reported their adherence to restrictive measures, i.e., media control, vaccination pass, and mandatory vaccination.
RESULTS: Vaccination intention was higher in the no love/prejudice and materialism conditions than in the love and control conditions. Adherence to restrictive measures mediated the effect of prejudice or materialism priming on intention to get vaccinated.
CONCLUSIONS: Implications of these results are discussed in light of the socially situated cognition perspective and the congruence of (a) a societal context of communication toward the vaccine and the unvaccinated, (b) the participant's degree of adherence to that communication, (c) the theme of priming, whether or not related to feeling connected to others. Implications of materialism priming are discussed, and the effect of commitment on intention to get vaccinated.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):700-6 [PMID: 19422625]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Mar;3(3):349-53 [PMID: 5906339]
  3. Health Psychol Rep. 2022 Mar 21;10(2):139-148 [PMID: 38084329]
  4. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct 1;16(5):269-274 [PMID: 19343102]
  5. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110420 [PMID: 33082614]
  6. J Soc Psychol. 2016;156(1):1-7 [PMID: 25950374]
  7. Vaccine. 2022 Feb 16;40(8):1074-1081 [PMID: 35090777]
  8. Science. 2006 Nov 17;314(5802):1154-6 [PMID: 17110581]
  9. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260230 [PMID: 34851986]
  10. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;98:104241 [PMID: 34690362]
  11. Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):178-182 [PMID: 34863619]
  12. Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Nov 29;10(1):31-36 [PMID: 38084366]
  13. Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan;61(1):410-431 [PMID: 34312892]
  14. Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1348-54 [PMID: 20732902]
  15. Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(9):1942-1953 [PMID: 35264033]
  16. Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Jun 28;9(4):338-397 [PMID: 38084306]
  17. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0259059 [PMID: 34710168]
  18. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560 [PMID: 32304649]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0primingvaccinationintentionmaterialismcommunicationadherencelovecontrolCOVID-19towardunvaccinatedwhetherothers=love/prejudicerestrictivemeasuresconditionseffectprejudicegetvaccinatedImplicationsdiscussedsociallysituatedcognitioncongruenceBACKGROUND:studytookplaceheightfifthwaveFrancecoincidingstigmatizinghypothesizedfacilitateinhibiteffectsdependingincludeddimensionconnectionPARTICIPANTSANDPROCEDURE:convenienceonlineFrenchsample1800age2630askedconditionParticipantsalsoreportediemediapassmandatoryRESULTS:VaccinationhigherAdherencemediatedCONCLUSIONS:resultslightperspectivesocietalcontextvaccinebparticipant'sdegreecthemerelatedfeelingconnectedcommitmentPrimingintention:mediationanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By