The mechanism of internal and external efficacy influences residents' pro-environmental behavior through environmental willingness.

Qi-Song Yan, Zhao-Qi Zhang, Cai-Xia Er, Wen-Qing Wang
Author Information
  1. Qi-Song Yan: School of Law, Politics and Economics, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, PR China. ORCID
  2. Zhao-Qi Zhang: School of Sociology, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
  3. Cai-Xia Er: School of Sociology, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, Yunnan, PR China.
  4. Wen-Qing Wang: School of Law, Politics and Economics, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, Chongqing, PR China.

Abstract

The Chinese government's environmental conservation efforts require the active participation of all society. This study investigated how internal and external efficacy influence pro-environmental behavior with environmental willingness as a mediator. This study employed a structural equation model to analyze the data from 1499 survey questionnaires. The analysis revealed that both internal and external efficacy can enhance individuals' pro-environmental behavior in the private and public spheres. External efficacy has a stronger impact on environmental willingness and public sphere environmental behavior, while internal efficacy more significantly influences private sphere environmental behavior. Additionally, environmental willingness only mediates efficacy and public sphere environmental behavior. The innovation of this study is the examination of internal and external efficacy from the perspective of different sources and the comparison of their differential impacts on pro-environmental behavior. Relevant policies should effectively enhance residents' internal and external efficacy to comprehensively improve their level of pro-environmental behavior.

References

  1. Waste Manag. 2020 Dec;118:270-280 [PMID: 32919346]
  2. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 [PMID: 847061]
  3. J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111655 [PMID: 33309109]
  4. Multivariate Behav Res. 1992 Oct 1;27(4):601-34 [PMID: 26811136]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 03;18(11): [PMID: 34205130]
  6. Int J Psychol. 2014 Jun;49(3):141-57 [PMID: 24821503]
  7. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 23;11:580730 [PMID: 33424694]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  9. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 28;17(12):e0279568 [PMID: 36576939]
  10. J Psychol. 2017 Apr 3;151(3):321-333 [PMID: 28339352]
  11. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(18):1932-41 [PMID: 25743541]
  12. J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110806 [PMID: 32507737]
  13. Span J Psychol. 2012 Jul;15(2):648-58 [PMID: 22774439]

MeSH Term

Humans
Policy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Behavior Therapy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0environmentalefficacybehaviorinternalexternalpro-environmentalwillingnessstudypublicsphereenhanceprivateinfluencesresidents'Chinesegovernment'sconservationeffortsrequireactiveparticipationsocietyinvestigatedinfluencemediatoremployedstructuralequationmodelanalyzedata1499surveyquestionnairesanalysisrevealedcanindividuals'spheresExternalstrongerimpactsignificantlyAdditionallymediatesinnovationexaminationperspectivedifferentsourcescomparisondifferentialimpactsRelevantpolicieseffectivelycomprehensivelyimprovelevelmechanism

Similar Articles

Cited By