Conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and postoperative scar.

Xia Gong, Jia Li, Angang Ding, Jiaxin Zuo, Yamin Rao, Jun Chen, Ping Xiong
Author Information
  1. Xia Gong: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
  2. Jia Li: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
  3. Angang Ding: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
  4. Jiaxin Zuo: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
  5. Yamin Rao: Department of Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China.
  6. Jun Chen: Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China. chenjun125125@126.com.
  7. Ping Xiong: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, P. R. China. xiongpxp@163.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) has a high recurrence rate after resection. Because of the lack of specific manifestations, recurrent DFSP is easily misdiagnosed as post-resection scar. A few series have reported ultrasound findings of recurrent DFSP; moreover, the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating recurrent DFSP has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of recurrent DFSP and post-resection scar.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the findings of conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in 34 cases of recurrent DFSP and 38 postoperative scars examined between January 2018 and December 2022.
RESULTS: The depth and vascular density of recurrent DFSP were greater than those of postoperative scars (P < 0.05). On gray-scale ultrasound, recurrent DFSP lesions were more commonly irregular, heterogeneous, and hypoechoic, with finger-like projections and ill-defined borders. Postoperative scar was more likely to appear as hypoechoic and homogeneous with well-defined borders (P < 0.05). On color Doppler ultrasound, recurrent DFSP was more likely to feature rich arterial and venous blood flow, and postoperative scar was more likely to display poor blood flow (P < 0.05). On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, recurrent DFSP was more likely to feature heterogeneous hyper-enhancement, and postoperative scar was more likely to display homogeneous iso-enhancement (P < 0.05). Recurrent DFSP presented a higher peak and sharpness than postoperative scar (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound produced distinct features of recurrent DFSP and post-resection scar, which could improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Nov;37(11):1638-45 [PMID: 21679274]
  2. J Ultrasound Med. 1999 Feb;18(2):89-93 [PMID: 10206814]
  3. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Dec;41(12):3137-3144 [PMID: 35920315]
  4. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(6):553-9 [PMID: 2238263]
  5. Hautarzt. 2013 Jul;64(7):512-5 [PMID: 23595891]
  6. BMC Cancer. 2021 Aug 10;21(1):909 [PMID: 34376150]
  7. J Ultrasound. 2020 Mar;23(1):45-53 [PMID: 30927249]
  8. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2013 Feb;30(1):13-28 [PMID: 23327727]
  9. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910413 [PMID: 31469398]
  10. J Dermatol. 2020 May;47(5):527-533 [PMID: 32096237]
  11. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2604-8 [PMID: 26189684]
  12. BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):1137 [PMID: 36335314]
  13. J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 27;12(12): [PMID: 36556182]
  14. J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 05;9(6): [PMID: 32516921]
  15. AMA Arch Surg. 1951 Mar;62(3):391-411 [PMID: 14799050]
  16. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008 Oct;36(8):520-2 [PMID: 18431749]
  17. Australas J Dermatol. 2019 May;60(2):e148-e150 [PMID: 30318748]
  18. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;11(4):697-703 [PMID: 26881504]
  19. J Ultrasound Med. 2008 Feb;27(2):269-74 [PMID: 18204018]
  20. Skin Res Technol. 2021 Sep;27(5):701-708 [PMID: 33455037]
  21. Dermatol Ther. 2016 Nov;29(6):473-475 [PMID: 27572421]
  22. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;280(5):827-30 [PMID: 19252921]
  23. Front Oncol. 2021 May 26;11:662273 [PMID: 34123819]
  24. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2023 Dec 4;: [PMID: 38056785]
  25. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Apr;48(4):602-614 [PMID: 33465812]
  26. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2019 Mar 14;20(4):29 [PMID: 30874910]
  27. Ultraschall Med. 2018 Apr;39(2):e2-e44 [PMID: 29510439]
  28. J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 Jan;50(1):121-127 [PMID: 34761407]
  29. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016 Jun;107(5):414-20 [PMID: 26944448]

Grants

  1. 201901/Clinical Research Project of Multi-Disciplinary Team, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
  2. JYHJB202201/Rare Disease Registration Platform of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRare Disease Registration Platform of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai
  3. JYJC202132/Cross Research Fund Project of the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

MeSH Term

Humans
Cicatrix
Diagnosis, Differential
Dermatofibrosarcoma
Retrospective Studies
Skin Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DFSPrecurrentultrasoundscarcontrast-enhancedpostoperativeP < 005likelyprotuberanspost-resectiondifferentialdiagnosisConventionalfindingsconventionalscarsheterogeneoushypoechoicbordersPostoperativehomogeneousDopplerfeaturebloodflowdisplayRecurrentdermatofibrosarcomaBACKGROUND:DermatofibrosarcomahighrecurrencerateresectionlackspecificmanifestationseasilymisdiagnosedseriesreportedmoreoverusefulnessdifferentiatingstudiedOBJECTIVE:investigatedMETHODS:retrospectivelyevaluated34cases38examinedJanuary2018December2022RESULTS:depthvasculardensitygreatergray-scalelesionscommonlyirregularfinger-likeprojectionsill-definedappearwell-definedcolorricharterialvenouspoorhyper-enhancementiso-enhancementpresentedhigherpeaksharpnessCONCLUSION:produceddistinctfeaturesimproveaccuracyColorContrast-enhanced

Similar Articles

Cited By