Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) at a maternity and children hospital in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Hadiah Almutairi, Heyam Albahadel, Abdullah A Alhifany, Hind Aldalbahi, Faris S Alnezary, Ibrahim Alqusi, Mugahid A Mobark, Masaad Saeed Almutairi
Author Information
  1. Hadiah Almutairi: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Hafr Albatin, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Heyam Albahadel: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Abdullah A Alhifany: Pharmaceutical Practices Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Hind Aldalbahi: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Faris S Alnezary: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Taibah University, Madinah 41477, Saudi Arabia.
  6. Ibrahim Alqusi: Laboratory Department, Maternity and Children Hospital in Buraydah City, Ministry of Health, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
  7. Mugahid A Mobark: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.
  8. Masaad Saeed Almutairi: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant (MRSA) pathogens are considered a serious global health threat, leading to increased mortality and antimicrobial resistance. Rates in Saudi Arabia remain high, necessitating continuous surveillance. This study investigates MRSA prevalence and susceptibility at a Saudi maternity and children's hospital.
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on pediatric (<18 years) and maternal patients with infection from Jan. 2020 to March. 2022. Bacterial strains were obtained from patient's clinical specimens and was identified by standard method. The BD Phoenix™ M50 was used for antibiotic susceptibility tests and MRSA detection. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) with SPSS software.
Results: Out of 152 cases, 114/152 (75 %) were pediatric and 38/152 (25 %) were maternal patients. The overall MRSA infection was 69/152 (45.4 %). Among pediatrics, 31/54 (57.4 %) MRSA cases were female; over 30/54 (56 %) were under 1 year old; and most MRSA infections were obtained from skin 29/54 (53.7 %) compared to other sites of infections (p = 0.024). Among maternal cases, 15/38 (39.5 %) were MRSA, primarily from wound infections 14/15 (93.3 %) compared to other sites of infections (p = 0.39). All MRSA isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and linezolid. While 51/60(85 %) were sensitive to Trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole.
Conclusion: This investigation found a high prevalence of MRSA among pediatrics and maternal inpatients, indicating a significant burden. All MRSA isolates were susceptible to vancomycin but demonstrated variable sensitivity to other antibiotics. These findings highlight the need for ongoing surveillance, infection control strategies, and research into alternative treatment options to combat this major public health threat.

Keywords

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1342-7 [PMID: 12672861]
  2. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Nov 30;9(11):1284-8 [PMID: 26623639]
  3. BMC Microbiol. 2012 Jul 23;12:146 [PMID: 22823982]
  4. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jan;69(1):211-8 [PMID: 23997017]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52 Suppl 5:S397-428 [PMID: 21474585]
  6. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2022 Jun 30;16(6):1037-1044 [PMID: 35797299]
  7. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 1;49(11):1749-55 [PMID: 19857164]
  8. Nepal Med Coll J. 2014 Sep;16(1):42-4 [PMID: 25799810]
  9. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 18;12(1):913 [PMID: 35042878]
  10. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(8):667-71 [PMID: 18979606]
  11. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):1986-1994 [PMID: 34435346]
  12. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;59 Suppl 3:S97-100 [PMID: 25261548]
  13. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;42(6):2398-402 [PMID: 15184410]
  14. Saudi Med J. 2019 Mar;40(3):252-259 [PMID: 30834420]
  15. Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655 [PMID: 35065702]
  16. Am J Med Sci. 2010 Nov;340(5):378-81 [PMID: 20944499]
  17. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 May-Jun;40(1-2):1-4 [PMID: 11448556]
  18. Ital J Pediatr. 2022 May 7;48(1):67 [PMID: 35526042]
  19. Microb Pathog. 2022 Oct;171:105743 [PMID: 36044936]
  20. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;28(3):603-61 [PMID: 26016486]
  21. Future Microbiol. 2011 Jan;6(1):43-56 [PMID: 21162635]
  22. Int Surg. 2014 May-Jun;99(3):264-8 [PMID: 24833150]
  23. Yale J Biol Med. 2017 Jun 23;90(2):269-281 [PMID: 28656013]
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Feb 15;36(4):429-39 [PMID: 12567300]
  25. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Feb 15;38(4):521-8 [PMID: 14765345]
  26. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2015 Sep-Dec;2(3-4):136-140 [PMID: 30805452]
  27. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Nov;39(11):1002-1006 [PMID: 32467455]
  28. Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 15;11(8): [PMID: 37630646]
  29. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023 Feb;21(2):99-113 [PMID: 36470275]
  30. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2016 Jun;3(2):71-77 [PMID: 30805471]
  31. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Dec 23;34(49):e315 [PMID: 31858755]
  32. Can J Microbiol. 2010 Feb;56(2):89-120 [PMID: 20237572]
  33. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012 Jul 19;1(1):26 [PMID: 22958584]
  34. Euro Surveill. 2010 Oct 14;15(41):19688 [PMID: 20961515]
  35. Pak J Biol Sci. 2016;19(5):233-238 [PMID: 29023028]
  36. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):482-7 [PMID: 16946204]
  37. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Aug;28(8):742-4 [PMID: 19633520]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSASaudimaternalinfectionsstudysusceptibilityinfectioncaseshealththreatantimicrobialresistanceArabiahighsurveillanceprevalencematernityhospitalcross-sectionalpediatricpatientsobtained4 %Amongpediatricscomparedsitesp = 039isolatessensitivevancomycincontrolPrevalenceBackground:Methicillin-resistantpathogensconsideredseriousgloballeadingincreasedmortalityRatesremainnecessitatingcontinuousinvestigateschildren'sMethod:conducted<18 yearsJan2020March2022Bacterialstrainspatient'sclinicalspecimensidentifiedstandardmethodBDPhoenix™M50usedantibiotictestsdetectionDataanalysedusingdescriptiveinferentialstatisticsChi-squaretestSPSSsoftwareResults:152114/15275 %38/15225 %overall69/1524531/5457female30/5456 %1 yearoldskin29/54537 %02415/385 %primarilywound14/15933 %linezolid51/6085 %Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleConclusion:investigationfoundamonginpatientsindicatingsignificantburdensusceptibledemonstratedvariablesensitivityantibioticsfindingshighlightneedongoingstrategiesresearchalternativetreatmentoptionscombatmajorpublicpatternmethicillin-resistantchildrenArabia:AntibioticInfectionPediatric

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)