Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a radiological and clinical study.

Waleed Moneir, Ahmed Yasser Darwish, Yasser Wafeek Khafagy, Mahmoud Attia Youssef, Mohammed Magdy El Rakhawy, Ahmed Hemdan
Author Information
  1. Waleed Moneir: Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  2. Ahmed Yasser Darwish: Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  3. Yasser Wafeek Khafagy: Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  4. Mahmoud Attia Youssef: Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  5. Mohammed Magdy El Rakhawy: Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  6. Ahmed Hemdan: Lecturer of Otorhinolaryngology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt. ORCID

Abstract

Aim: to assess radiologically the prevalence of SSCD with its clinical presentations and its relationship with age.
Methods: a prospective cohort study carried out on 200 consecutive patients (400 temporal bones). Radiological evaluation was performed using High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) with measurement of thickness of bone covering superior semicircular canal (SCC), height and diameter of SSC.
Results: Two hundred patients (400 temporal bones) were involved. The mean thickness��������SD, the mean diameter��������SD and the mean height��������SD were 1.38��������0.80 mm, 0.94��������0.26 mm and 10.91��������2.39 mm respectively. The prevalence of SSCD and predehiscence were 1% and 14% respectively. The commonest symptom encountered was autophony (48.3%). When the SSC thickness, diameter and height were compared with the age of patients, statistically significant differences were detected. The highest diameter, lowest height and lowest thickness were found in patients aged from 54 to 72 years. Thickness of bony layer covering SSC was found to be the most validated measurement for differentiation between cases with positive and negative symptoms with the highest sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusion: The prevalence of SSCD and predehiscence varied among the studies. Autophony is the commonest symptom usually encountered. The condition is acquired rather than congenital. The thickness of bone covering SCC is the most validated measurement in differentiation between cases with positive and negative symptoms.

Keywords

References

  1. Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10):1717-27 [PMID: 16222184]
  2. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013 Jan;35(1):61-5 [PMID: 22986650]
  3. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Feb;33(2):215-22 [PMID: 22222573]
  4. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Mar;124(3):249-58 [PMID: 9525507]
  5. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Dec;277(12):3423-3430 [PMID: 32458122]
  6. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Aug;66:128-132 [PMID: 31103254]
  7. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Sep;130(9):996-1001 [PMID: 20205621]
  8. Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):1940-5 [PMID: 25779775]
  9. Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 21;11:695 [PMID: 32793102]
  10. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Mar;117(3):e280-8 [PMID: 24528799]
  11. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Jun;139(6):473-478 [PMID: 31035843]
  12. Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):312-4 [PMID: 12563121]
  13. Pediatr Radiol. 2012 Dec;42(12):1456-64 [PMID: 22956179]
  14. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Apr;133(2):91-4 [PMID: 26671715]
  15. Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jan;121(1):68-75 [PMID: 11270498]
  16. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Jan/Feb;44(1):53-58 [PMID: 31939882]
  17. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;20(10):1973-5 [PMID: 10588128]
  18. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):121-9 [PMID: 15021770]
  19. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Nov;76(2):167-72 [PMID: 19540691]
  20. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Nov;43(11):1839-1844 [PMID: 34241668]
  21. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Feb;126(2):137-47 [PMID: 10680863]
  22. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 May;32(5):947-9 [PMID: 21393404]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsthicknessprevalenceSSCDmeasurementbonecoveringheightdiameterSSCmeanclinicalagestudy400temporalbonessemicircularcanalSCCrespectivelypredehiscencecommonestsymptomencounteredhighestlowestfoundvalidateddifferentiationcasespositivenegativesymptomsSuperiorAim:assessradiologicallypresentationsrelationshipMethods:prospectivecohortcarried200consecutiveRadiologicalevaluationperformedusingHighResolutionComputedTomographyHRCTsuperiorResults:Twohundredinvolvedthickness��������SDdiameter��������SDheight��������SD138��������080 mm094��������026 mm1091��������239 mm1%14%autophony483%comparedstatisticallysignificantdifferencesdetectedaged5472yearsThicknessbonylayersensitivityspecificityConclusion:variedamongstudiesAutophonyusuallyconditionacquiredrathercongenitaldehiscence:radiologicalDehiscenceSemicircularCanalTemporalCT

Similar Articles

Cited By