Glow up: does a professional photoshoot intervention affect self-esteem and emotions among adolescent psychiatric patients?-A longitudinal intervention study.

Kornelius Winds, Theresa Marka, Bernhard Salcher, Nicole Rieser, Christine Skrivanek, Michelle Hochrainer, Julia Trost-Schrems, Lucas J Rainer, Wolfgang Hitzl, Christoph Augner, Belinda Plattner
Author Information
  1. Kornelius Winds: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  2. Theresa Marka: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  3. Bernhard Salcher: Department of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
  4. Nicole Rieser: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  5. Christine Skrivanek: University Clinics for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  6. Michelle Hochrainer: University Clinics for Pediatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  7. Julia Trost-Schrems: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  8. Lucas J Rainer: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  9. Wolfgang Hitzl: Research Office Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  10. Christoph Augner: University Clinics for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  11. Belinda Plattner: University Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Salzburger Landeskliniken, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Abstract

Background: Today, online communication is shaped by a billion-dollar social media (SM) and social networking site (SNS) industry. Visual content consumed by children and adolescents has been shown to influence behavioral patterns, state emotions, and self-esteem (SE). In this study, we introduced a novel intervention creating visual content through a professional photoshoot and investigated its impact on state emotions and SE in child and adolescent psychiatric (CAP) patients.
Methods: Standardized and validated self-rating questionnaires were used to assess SE, state emotions, coping mechanisms, psychopathological symptoms, and internet use behavior at baseline. SE and state emotions were monitored at different time points around a professional photoshoot within 45 CAP patients (30 female patients; mean age, 15.1 years) using a longitudinal design.
Results: Within-subject repeated-measures ANOVA and bootstrapped paired-sample -tests showed a significant fluctuation in state emotions and SE throughout the intervention. Spearman correlations and univariate logistic regressions revealed that internalizing symptomatology and maladaptive coping significantly worsened the outcome of the intervention on state emotions and SE in girls. Internet-related variables heightened the positive effect of the intervention in boys and lowered SE in girls during the intervention.
Conclusion: The photo intervention had various gender-specific effects. Boys did benefit from the intervention in terms of longitudinal outcome on positive state emotions (PE) and SE, even positively influenced by SNS and SM. Thus, it might be concluded that online social comparison was processed more beneficial in boys. In contrast, when working with visual content in girls, psychopathology and coping must be considered. Internet consumption in general, especially SM and SNS, was related to low SE in girls. Nevertheless, when therapeutically accompanied, the "glow up moment" during the shoot (high on PE and SE; low on negative state emotions) could be used as an index moment for therapeutic reflection.

Keywords

References

  1. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;54(8):987-996 [PMID: 30929042]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Sep;63(3):391-402 [PMID: 1403622]
  3. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;26(8):909-921 [PMID: 28190138]
  4. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):380-5 [PMID: 26167836]
  5. Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 09;6:779 [PMID: 26106354]
  6. Psychol Well Being. 2016;6:8 [PMID: 27441169]
  7. Psychol Rev. 1989 Oct;96(4):569-75 [PMID: 2678204]
  8. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):636-50 [PMID: 22903221]
  9. Psychol Bull. 2001 Nov;127(6):773-96 [PMID: 11726071]
  10. Eur J Psychol. 2016 May 31;12(2):260-70 [PMID: 27298635]
  11. Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 20;6:1573 [PMID: 26539135]
  12. Brain Cogn. 2010 Feb;72(1):124-33 [PMID: 19695759]
  13. Health (London). 2016 Mar;20(2):110-26 [PMID: 25673051]
  14. Psychol Bull. 1994 May;115(3):424-43 [PMID: 8016286]
  15. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Feb;12(1):1-6 [PMID: 19072079]
  16. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Mar;30(2):252-62 [PMID: 26999354]
  17. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 04;13:1085518 [PMID: 36687936]
  18. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Nov;70:74-85 [PMID: 27506384]
  19. Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106601 [PMID: 32942097]
  20. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 11;13:1068737 [PMID: 36713917]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 [PMID: 3397865]
  22. J Pers. 2005 Dec;73(6):1569-605 [PMID: 16274446]
  23. Psychol Health. 2016;31(2):147-65 [PMID: 26274387]
  24. Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:74-9 [PMID: 27249805]
  25. Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):674-686 [PMID: 30461115]
  26. Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;9(11): [PMID: 36360452]
  27. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Jun;22(6):412-416 [PMID: 31107106]
  28. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:110-115 [PMID: 31563107]
  29. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):370-93 [PMID: 25496340]
  30. J Affect Disord. 2006 Jul;93(1-3):97-103 [PMID: 16563520]
  31. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Jan;39(1):109-23 [PMID: 20683651]
  32. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;57(1):21-7 [PMID: 10632229]
  33. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2006 Jan-Mar;15(1):30-43 [PMID: 16584101]
  34. World J Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 22;6(1):143-76 [PMID: 27014605]
  35. Nutr Diet. 2020 Feb;77(1):19-40 [PMID: 31583837]
  36. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Oct;20(10):603-609 [PMID: 29039700]
  37. Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(2):75-81 [PMID: 24080838]
  38. Adolescence. 2004 Fall;39(155):571-92 [PMID: 15673231]
  39. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006 Dec;35(4):539-49 [PMID: 17007599]
  40. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:275-303 [PMID: 18370618]
  41. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169839 [PMID: 28068404]
  42. J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Feb;46(2):261-276 [PMID: 27734198]
  43. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Aug;22(8):535-542 [PMID: 31361508]
  44. Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):548-557 [PMID: 28679165]
  45. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020;48(1):79-95 [PMID: 32431463]
  46. J Youth Adolesc. 1991 Apr;20(2):247-71 [PMID: 24265009]
  47. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2005 Oct-Dec;26(3-4):163-74 [PMID: 16309736]
  48. J Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(8):1003-1011 [PMID: 27611630]
  49. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;19(18): [PMID: 36141740]
  50. Health (London). 2019 Nov;23(6):621-638 [PMID: 29627990]
  51. Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 04;9:2651 [PMID: 30662421]
  52. Ment Health Clin. 2020 Jul 02;10(4):237-243 [PMID: 32685335]
  53. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 29;2018:1629147 [PMID: 29789775]
  54. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 15;17(8): [PMID: 32326600]
  55. Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:287-293 [PMID: 27072491]
  56. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):770-7 [PMID: 24602498]
  57. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Oct;15:11-25 [PMID: 26340451]
  58. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Apr;55(2):497-509 [PMID: 36070055]
  59. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Dec;11(6):739-41 [PMID: 18991531]
  60. J Psychol. 2022;156(3):200-223 [PMID: 35021037]
  61. Child Dev. 1989 Feb;60(1):40-55 [PMID: 2702873]
  62. Adolescence. 2006 Fall;41(163):409-15 [PMID: 17225659]
  63. Body Image. 2015 Jun;14:54-61 [PMID: 25880783]
  64. Eur J Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;14(4):831-845 [PMID: 30555588]
  65. Span J Psychol. 2009 May;12(1):149-60 [PMID: 19476228]
  66. Science. 1959 Aug 21;130(3373):421-32 [PMID: 13675765]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emotionsSEinterventionstatesocialgirlsSMSNScontentself-esteemprofessionalphotoshootadolescentpatientscopinglongitudinalonlinemedianetworkingchildrenstudyvisualpsychiatricCAPusedoutcomepositiveboysphotoPElowBackground:Todaycommunicationshapedbillion-dollarsiteindustryVisualconsumedadolescentsshowninfluencebehavioralpatternsintroducednovelcreatinginvestigatedimpactchildMethods:Standardizedvalidatedself-ratingquestionnairesassessmechanismspsychopathologicalsymptomsinternetusebehaviorbaselinemonitoreddifferenttimepointsaroundwithin4530femalemeanage151yearsusingdesignResults:Within-subjectrepeated-measuresANOVAbootstrappedpaired-sample-testsshowedsignificantfluctuationthroughoutSpearmancorrelationsunivariatelogisticregressionsrevealedinternalizingsymptomatologymaladaptivesignificantlyworsenedInternet-relatedvariablesheightenedeffectloweredConclusion:variousgender-specificeffectsBoysbenefittermsevenpositivelyinfluencedThusmightconcludedcomparisonprocessedbeneficialcontrastworkingpsychopathologymustconsideredInternetconsumptiongeneralespeciallyrelatedNeverthelesstherapeuticallyaccompanied"glowmoment"shoothighnegativeindexmomenttherapeuticreflectionGlowup:affectamongpatients?-Apsychiatrygenderdifferencessites

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.