Transforming Integrated Care Through Co-production: A Systematic Review Using Meta-ethnography.

Susan Conquer, Richard Iles, Karen Windle, Rachel Heathershaw, Chantal F Ski
Author Information
  1. Susan Conquer: University of Suffolk, UK. ORCID
  2. Richard Iles: Guy's and St Thomas'NHS Foundation Trust, UK. ORCID
  3. Karen Windle: University of Suffolk, UK. ORCID
  4. Rachel Heathershaw: University of Suffolk, UK.
  5. Chantal F Ski: Queen's University Belfast, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Introduction: There is a requirement for health and care systems and services to work on an equitable basis with people who use and provide integrated care. In response, co-production has become essential in the design and transformation of services. Globally, an array of approaches have been implemented to achieve this. This unique review explores multi-context and multi-method examples of co-production in integrated care using an exceptional combination of methods.
Aim: To review and synthesise evidence that examines how co-production with service users, unpaid carers and members of staff can affect the design and transformation of integrated care services.
Methods: Systematic review using meta-ethnography with input from a patient and public involvement (PPI) co-production advisory group. Meta-ethnography can generate theories by interpreting patterns between studies set in different contexts. Nine academic and four grey literature databases were searched for publications between 2012-2022. Data were extracted, analysed, translated and interpreted using the seven phases of meta-ethnography and PPI.
Findings: A total of 2,097 studies were identified. 10 met the inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrated a variety of integrated care provisions for diverse populations. Co-production was most successful through person-centred design, innovative planning, and collaboration. Key impacts on service transformation were structural changes, accessibility, and acceptability of service delivery. The methods applied organically drew out new interpretations, namely a novel cyclic framework for application within integrated care.
Conclusion: Effective co-production requires a process with a well-defined focus. Implementing co-delivery, with peer support, facilitates service user involvement to be embedded at a higher level on the 'ladder of co-production'. An additional step on the ladder is proposed; a cyclic co-delivery framework. This innovative and operational development has potential to enable better-sustained person-centred integrated care services.

Keywords

References

  1. Creat Nurs. 2013;19(3):122-7 [PMID: 24400466]
  2. Int J Integr Care. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):6 [PMID: 30881264]
  3. Int J Integr Care. 2009 Jun 17;9:e82 [PMID: 19590762]
  4. J Res Nurs. 2020 May;25(3):211-224 [PMID: 34394628]
  5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 05;16(a):358 [PMID: 27495148]
  6. Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):952-964 [PMID: 31044517]
  7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Nov 25;15:103 [PMID: 26606922]
  8. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Feb 10;19(1):17 [PMID: 33568139]
  9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):797 [PMID: 31690304]
  10. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):307-10 [PMID: 17074863]
  11. Health Expect. 2019 Feb;22(1):93-101 [PMID: 30289592]
  12. Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 15;21(2):3 [PMID: 33953649]
  13. Nurs Health Sci. 2019 Dec;21(4):523-530 [PMID: 31495060]
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):556 [PMID: 35473622]
  15. N Z Med J. 2012 Jun 29;125(1357):76-87 [PMID: 22854362]
  16. Milbank Q. 2009 Jun;87(2):391-416 [PMID: 19523123]
  17. Integr Healthc J. 2020 Feb 26;2(1):e000013 [PMID: 37441304]
  18. BMJ. 2023 Aug 16;382:1820 [PMID: 37586727]
  19. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):50 [PMID: 33419430]
  20. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):928 [PMID: 34488732]
  21. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S234-S243 [PMID: 34845047]
  22. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17 [PMID: 26376674]
  23. Int J Integr Care. 2016 Apr 08;16(1):1 [PMID: 27616946]
  24. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jul;29(4):1145-1168 [PMID: 33058359]
  25. Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1240-1250 [PMID: 31433546]
  26. Sante Ment Que. 2015 Spring;40(1):101-17 [PMID: 26355482]
  27. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2007;20(2-3):195-214 [PMID: 17585617]
  28. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Nov 29;33(Supplement_2):ii15-ii22 [PMID: 34849965]
  29. Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 17;7(1):16 [PMID: 33731217]
  30. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 11;7(7):e014650 [PMID: 28701409]
  31. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9:CD013373 [PMID: 34523117]
  32. Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e36-47 [PMID: 23374430]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careintegratedco-productionservicesdesigntransformationservicereviewusingmeta-ethnographyinvolvementco-deliverymethodscanSystematicpatientpublicPPIMeta-ethnographystudiesperson-centredinnovativecyclicframeworkIntroduction:requirementhealthsystemsworkequitablebasispeopleuseprovideresponsebecomeessentialGloballyarrayapproachesimplementedachieveuniqueexploresmulti-contextmulti-methodexamplesexceptionalcombinationAim:synthesiseevidenceexaminesusersunpaidcarersmembersstaffaffectMethods:inputadvisorygroupgeneratetheoriesinterpretingpatternssetdifferentcontextsNineacademicfourgreyliteraturedatabasessearchedpublications2012-2022DataextractedanalysedtranslatedinterpretedsevenphasesFindings:total2097identified10metinclusioncriteriaStudiesdemonstratedvarietyprovisionsdiversepopulationsCo-productionsuccessfulplanningcollaborationKeyimpactsstructuralchangesaccessibilityacceptabilitydeliveryappliedorganicallydrewnewinterpretationsnamelynovelapplicationwithinConclusion:Effectiverequiresprocesswell-definedfocusImplementingpeersupportfacilitatesuserembeddedhigherlevel'ladderco-production'additionalstepladderproposedoperationaldevelopmentpotentialenablebetter-sustainedTransformingIntegratedCareCo-production:ReviewUsing

Similar Articles

Cited By