EUS-BD for calibration of benign stenosis of the bile duct in patients with altered anatomy or inaccessible papilla.

Fabrice Caillol, S��bastien Godat, Alexey Solovyev, Amina Harouchi, Sarra Oumrani, Mariola Marx, Solene Hoibian, Yanis Dahel, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini
Author Information
  1. Fabrice Caillol: Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France. ORCID
  2. S��bastien Godat: gastroent��rologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  3. Alexey Solovyev: Statistics Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France. ORCID
  4. Amina Harouchi: Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  5. Sarra Oumrani: Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  6. Mariola Marx: Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  7. Solene Hoibian: Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  8. Yanis Dahel: Endoscopy Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  9. Jean-Philippe Ratone: Gastroenterology Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  10. Marc Giovannini: UEMCO, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.

Abstract

In cases of inaccessible papilla, EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been described as an alternative to calibrate benign biliary stenosis. However, few studies are available. This tw-center, retrospective study was designed to evaluate technical success and clinical success at 1 year. All patients who underswent EUS-BD without the rendezvous technique used for calibration of benign biliary stenosis were included from 2016 to 2022. Patients underwent EUS-hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) during the first session. Then, HGS was used to access the bile duct, allowing calibration of the stenosis: Dilation of the biliary stenosis and placement of double pigtail stents through the stenosis for 1 year. Thirty-six patients were included. Technical success was 89% (32/36), with four failures to cross the stenosis but EUS-HGS was performed in 100% of the cases. Nine patients were excluded during calibration because of oncological relapse in six and complex stenosis in three. Three patients had not yet reached 1 year of follow-up. Twenty patients had a calibration for at least 1 year. Clinical success after stent placement was considered in all cases after 1 year of follow-up. Thirteen patients underwent stent removal and no relapse occurred after 435 days of follow-up (SD=568). Global morbidity was 41.7% (15/36) with only one serious complication (needing intensive care), including seven cases of cholangitis due to intrabiliary duct obstruction and five stent migrations. No deaths were reported. EUS-BD for calibration in case of benign biliary stenosis is an option. Dedicated materials are needed to decrease morbidity.

Keywords

References

  1. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Jul-Aug;10(4):294-304 [PMID: 34259218]
  2. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 21;22(15):3945-51 [PMID: 27099437]
  3. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 May;21(5):328-34 [PMID: 24026963]
  4. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):851-7 [PMID: 20858809]
  5. Endoscopy. 2015 0;47(S 01):E583-E584 [PMID: 26649471]
  6. Dig Endosc. 2018 Apr;30 Suppl 1:77-78 [PMID: 29658657]
  7. Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):1054-7 [PMID: 24160798]
  8. Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):125-127 [PMID: 28902968]
  9. Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):234-237 [PMID: 34459031]
  10. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):398-403 [PMID: 31552912]
  11. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr;16(4):801-5 [PMID: 22331393]
  12. Dig Endosc. 2023 Jan;35(2):264-274 [PMID: 35763410]
  13. Endoscopy. 2018 Sep;50(9):910-930 [PMID: 30086596]
  14. Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1105-8 [PMID: 22057823]
  15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):692-3 [PMID: 21679943]
  16. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Jan-Feb;9(1):45-52 [PMID: 31552913]
  17. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Apr;23(4):227-33 [PMID: 26849099]
  18. Endoscopy. 2001 Oct;33(10):898-900 [PMID: 11571690]
  19. Endosc Ultrasound. 2022 Nov-Dec;11(6):495-502 [PMID: 36537387]
  20. Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):1961-7 [PMID: 19067052]
  21. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1347-55; quiz 1357 [PMID: 22999755]
  22. Endosc Int Open. 2018 Feb;6(2):E127-E130 [PMID: 29399608]
  23. Dig Endosc. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 2:136-43 [PMID: 24750164]
  24. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):399-407 [PMID: 30076841]
  25. Dig Liver Dis. 2022 Sep;54(9):1236-1242 [PMID: 35680522]
  26. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Apr;4(4):E461-5 [PMID: 27092329]
  27. Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 May-Jun;10(3):191-199 [PMID: 33463555]
  28. Clin Endosc. 2019 May;52(3):212-219 [PMID: 30866611]
  29. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 [PMID: 15273542]
  30. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Dec;21(12):E86-93 [PMID: 25231935]
  31. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1335-1337 [PMID: 29555343]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stenosispatientscalibrationbiliary1yearcasesEUS-BDbenignsuccessductfollow-upstentinaccessiblepapillausedincludedunderwentEUS-HGSbileplacementrelapsemorbidityEUS-guideddrainagedescribedalternativecalibrateHoweverstudiesavailabletw-centerretrospectivestudydesignedevaluatetechnicalclinicalunderswentwithoutrendezvoustechnique20162022PatientsEUS-hepaticogastrostomyfirstsessionHGSaccessallowingstenosis:DilationdoublepigtailstentsThirty-sixTechnical89%32/36fourfailurescrossperformed100%NineexcludedoncologicalsixcomplexthreeThreeyetreachedTwentyleastClinicalconsideredThirteenremovaloccurred435daysSD=568Global417%15/36oneseriouscomplicationneedingintensivecareincludingsevencholangitisdueintrabiliaryobstructionfivemigrationsdeathsreportedcaseoptionDedicatedmaterialsneededdecreasealteredanatomyBiliarytractEndoscopicultrasonographyInterventionEUSPancreatobiliaryERCP/PTCDStrictures

Similar Articles

Cited By