Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.

Ismail Dergaa, Lilia Zakhama, Chedly Dziri, Helmi Ben Saad
Author Information
  1. Ismail Dergaa: Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar.
  2. Lilia Zakhama: Cardiology Department, Security Forces Hospital-La Masa, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.
  3. Chedly Dziri: Professor Emeritus - General Surgery, University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Director of Honoris Medical Simulation Center, Tunis, Tunisia.
  4. Helmi Ben Saad: University of Sousse, Farhat Hached Hospital, Research Laboratory LR12SP09 ��Heart failure��, 4000 Sousse, Tunisia.

Abstract

The integrity of the peer-review process (PRP) is paramount in academic publishing and serves as a critical filter for scholarly output. This mini-review centers on the introduction of comprehensive guidelines, presented in tables format, aimed at streamlining the interactions between authors and reviewers during the PRP. These guidelines, derived from an in-depth exploration of the PRP, offer structured and practical advice to ensure constructive, transparent, and effective communication, especially related to the use of artificial intelligence. While this mini-review discusses the strengths and challenges of the current PRP, its primary focus is on providing tangible recommendations to enhance the quality and efficiency of the PRP. By providing explicit guidelines and emphasizing the cooperative essence of peer review, this mini-review aims to improve the PRP, ensuring that it remains a robust mechanism for upholding the highest standards of research and knowledge dissemination in an evolving academic setting.

References

  1. Vasc Specialist Int. 2022 Mar 31;38:8 [PMID: 35361743]
  2. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2023 Jun 26;118:e230001 [PMID: 37377250]
  3. BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jun 11;15(1):203 [PMID: 35690782]
  4. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;38(8):687-689 [PMID: 37440365]
  5. Acad Med. 2023 Nov 1;98(11S):S72-S78 [PMID: 37983399]
  6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:201-205 [PMID: 32061827]
  7. J Pediatr Health Care. 2023 Sep-Oct;37(5):570-574 [PMID: 37354156]
  8. Tunis Med. 2023 Mar 05;101(3):321-322 [PMID: 38263914]
  9. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Feb;156(2):105-7 [PMID: 11814367]
  10. J Med Toxicol. 2020 Jan;16(1):1-2 [PMID: 31853737]
  11. Biol Sport. 2023 Apr;40(2):615-622 [PMID: 37077800]
  12. EXCLI J. 2023 Jul 24;22:686-689 [PMID: 37662707]
  13. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31:15-9 [PMID: 27129625]
  14. Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):253 [PMID: 21593816]
  15. Tunis Med. 2019 Mar;97(3):407-425 [PMID: 31729715]
  16. Tunis Med. 2019 Feb;97(2):273-285 [PMID: 31539084]
  17. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;38(7):599-601 [PMID: 37408179]
  18. Women Birth. 2024 Mar;37(2):257-258 [PMID: 37635051]
  19. Tunis Med. 2023 Jun 05;101(6):533-536 [PMID: 38372545]
  20. Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1391-1392 [PMID: 37491588]
  21. Indian J Dent Res. 2023 Jan-Mar;34(1):1 [PMID: 37417047]
  22. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2023 Sep;37(3):209-212 [PMID: 37589917]
  23. Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):65-84 [PMID: 30572716]
  24. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Oct;99(4):291-292 [PMID: 37598082]
  25. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2021 Aug 2;69(1):21 [PMID: 34338896]

MeSH Term

Humans
Peer Review, Research
Artificial Intelligence
Publishing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PRPmini-reviewguidelinesprocessacademicscholarlyeffectiveartificialprovidingpeerreviewintegritypeer-reviewparamountpublishingservescriticalfilteroutputcentersintroductioncomprehensivepresentedtablesformataimedstreamlininginteractionsauthorsreviewersderivedin-depthexplorationofferstructuredpracticaladviceensureconstructivetransparentcommunicationespeciallyrelateduseintelligencediscussesstrengthschallengescurrentprimaryfocustangiblerecommendationsenhancequalityefficiencyexplicitemphasizingcooperativeessenceaimsimproveensuringremainsrobustmechanismupholdinghigheststandardsresearchknowledgedisseminationevolvingsettingEnhancingdiscourseageintelligence:guidedapproach

Similar Articles

Cited By