Effects of accumulated exercise on the stiffness and hemodynamics of the common carotid artery.

Haibin Liu, Bingyi Shen, Zusheng Li, Chundong Xue, Hongling Zhao, Xin Pan, Dong Xu
Author Information
  1. Haibin Liu: School of Sport and Health Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  2. Bingyi Shen: School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  3. Zusheng Li: School of Sport and Health Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  4. Chundong Xue: School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  5. Hongling Zhao: Department of Neurology, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  6. Xin Pan: Department of Neurology, Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
  7. Dong Xu: School of Sport and Health Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Abstract

This research aims to study and compare the effects of moderate-intensity continuous exercise and accumulated exercise with different number of bouts on common carotid arterial stiffness and hemodynamic variables. Thirty healthy male adults were recruited to complete four trials in a randomized crossover design: no-exercise (CON); continuous exercise (CE, 30-min cycling); accumulated exercise including two or three bouts with 10-min rest intervals (AE15, 2 × 15-min cycling; AE10, 3 × 10-min cycling). The intensity in all the exercise trials was set at 45%-55% heart rate reserve. Blood pressure, right common carotid artery center-line velocity, and arterial inner diameter waveforms were measured at baseline and immediately after exercise (0 min), 10 min, and 20 min. 1) The arterial stiffness index and pressure-strain elastic modulus of the CE and AE15 groups increased significantly at 0 min, arterial diameters decreased in AE15 and AE10, and all indicators recovered at 10 min. 2) The mean blood flow rate and carotid artery center-line velocity increased in all trials at 0 min, and only the mean blood flow rate of AE10 did not recover at 10 min. 3) At 0 min, the blood pressure in all trials was found to be increased, and the wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index of AE10 were different from those in CE and AE15. At 20 min, the blood pressure of AE10 significantly decreased, and the dynamic resistance, pulsatility index, and peripheral resistance of CE partially recovered. There is no significant difference in the acute effects of continuous exercise and accumulated exercise on the arterial stiffness and diameter of the carotid artery. Compared with continuous exercise, accumulated exercise with an increased number of bouts is more effective in increasing cerebral blood supply and blood pressure regulation, and its oscillatory shear index recovers faster. However, the improvement of blood flow resistance in continuous exercise was better than that in accumulated exercise.

Keywords

References

  1. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 08;2020:9027560 [PMID: 33224984]
  2. Hypertension. 2008 Feb;51(2):196-202 [PMID: 18158348]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;19(24): [PMID: 36554739]
  4. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jan;115(1):177-85 [PMID: 25260247]
  5. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:2907548 [PMID: 30112375]
  6. Thromb Res. 2018 Oct;170:119-125 [PMID: 30172998]
  7. Front Public Health. 2023 May 24;11:1165892 [PMID: 37333536]
  8. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Oct;85(4):1502-8 [PMID: 9760347]
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Feb;51(2):372-378 [PMID: 30252775]
  10. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1392-1401 [PMID: 29678322]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Dec;44(12):2270-6 [PMID: 22776874]
  12. Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 16;14:1113972 [PMID: 36726850]
  13. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Aug;29(8):881-93 [PMID: 15824746]
  14. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Mar;284(3):H970-8 [PMID: 12433655]
  15. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6 Suppl):S438-45; discussion S452-3 [PMID: 11427768]
  16. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2003 Spring;8(1):26-8 [PMID: 19644584]
  17. Exp Physiol. 2013 Jan;98(1):7-18 [PMID: 22872658]
  18. Pflugers Arch. 2019 Mar;471(3):467-478 [PMID: 30426247]
  19. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Jan 26;10(2): [PMID: 36826541]
  20. Hypertension. 2010 Feb;55(2):312-8 [PMID: 20048193]
  21. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Dec;7(9):797-802 [PMID: 25361602]
  22. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Oct;293(4):H2550-6 [PMID: 17693542]
  23. Sports Med Open. 2022 Jan 24;8(1):14 [PMID: 35072806]
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  25. Atherosclerosis. 2014 Mar;233(1):76-82 [PMID: 24529126]
  26. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 14;10(2): [PMID: 33466830]
  27. Cells. 2022 Nov 09;11(22): [PMID: 36428973]
  28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Feb;98(2):605-13 [PMID: 15489257]
  29. J Sports Sci. 2021 Jan;39(2):212-218 [PMID: 32835621]
  30. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Aug;92(4-5):498-507 [PMID: 15156321]
  31. Nitric Oxide. 2022 Aug 1;125-126:31-39 [PMID: 35705144]
  32. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Dec;283(6):C1612-20 [PMID: 12388066]
  33. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Apr;298(4):H1128-35 [PMID: 20154260]
  34. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 26;49(25):2379-93 [PMID: 17599600]
  35. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:478965 [PMID: 24818143]
  36. Hypertension. 2012 Oct;60(4):1016-22 [PMID: 22949528]
  37. Physiol Rev. 2017 Apr;97(2):495-528 [PMID: 28151424]
  38. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Mar;41(3):447-470 [PMID: 32954902]
  39. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Oct;115(10):2149-57 [PMID: 26032570]
  40. Hypertension. 2021 Dec;78(6):1844-1858 [PMID: 34719262]
  41. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):230-240 [PMID: 29022571]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exerciseaccumulatedbloodcontinuouscarotidarterialstiffnessAE10arterycommontrialsCEAE15pressure0 minindexincreasedboutscyclingrateflowshearresistanceeffectsdifferentnumber10-min2×3center-linevelocitydiameterminsignificantlydecreasedrecovered10 minmeanoscillatoryhemodynamicsresearchaimsstudycomparemoderate-intensityhemodynamicvariablesThirtyhealthymaleadultsrecruitedcompletefourrandomizedcrossoverdesign:no-exerciseCON30-minincludingtwothreerestintervals15-minintensityset45%-55%heartreserveBloodrightinnerwaveformsmeasuredbaselineimmediately10201pressure-strainelasticmodulusgroupsdiametersindicatorsrecoverfoundwallstress20 mindynamicpulsatilityperipheralpartiallysignificantdifferenceacuteComparedeffectiveincreasingcerebralsupplyregulationrecoversfasterHoweverimprovementbetterEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By