OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Psychological research
Jun, 2024;88 (4): 1389-1398.

Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention.

Yilu Yang, Lixin Su, Yi Pan
Author Information
  1. Yilu Yang: Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Lixin Su: Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  3. Yi Pan: Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. yipan@hznu.edu.cn.
PMID: 38478053 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01933-0

Abstract

Attention can be captured by the presence of distractors that match the current content of working memory in the visual field. This memory-driven capture is well established when observers adopt diffused attentional settings prior to the onset of memory-matching distractors. However, it remains unclear whether memory-driven capture can occur when observers are in a state of focused attention. The present study attempted to address this question by examining whether memory-matching distractors can disrupt performance on a focused attention task. Participants were asked to hold a sample word in working memory and then had to name a central color while ignoring an irrelevant distractor word in the visual display. In Experiments 1 and 2, the distractor word was always presented centrally within the focus of attention. In Experiment 3, the distractor word could be presented either at the center or at the periphery (i.e., outside the focus of attention). The results showed that the irrelevant distractor word within the focus of attention interfered with color-naming performance when it matched the sample word held in working memory. However, no interference effect was observed when the distractor word was presented outside the attentional focus. The present findings indicate that working memory-driven capture during a state of focused visual attention depends crucially on whether or not memory-matching distractors are positioned within the focus of attention.

References

  1. Bahle, B., Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 992–1011. [PMID: 29629781]
  2. Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). No capture outside the attentional window. Vision Research, 50, 2543–2550. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.023]
  3. Belopolsky, A. V., Zwaan, L., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). The size of attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 934–938. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03194124]
  4. Chun, M. M. (2011). Visual working memory as visual attention sustained internally over time. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1407–1409. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.029]
  5. Downing, P. E., & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11, 689–703. [DOI: 10.1080/13506280344000446]
  6. Dube, B., Lumsden, A., & Al-Aidroos, N. (2019). Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 641–646. [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7]
  7. Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 512–529. [DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.512]
  8. Gronau, N., Sequerra, E., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2006). The effect of novel distractors on performance in focused attention tasks: A cognitive-psychophysiological study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 570–575. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03193964]
  9. Gwinn, L., & O’Toole, H. (2016). Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1873–1881. [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1065-y]
  10. Han, S. W., & Kim, M.-S. (2009). Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1292–1302. [PMID: 19803637]
  11. Hernandez, M., Costa, A., & Humpherys, G. W. (2010). The size of an attentional window affects working memory guidance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 963–972. [DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.4.963]
  12. Hollingworth, A., & Beck, V. M. (2016). Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 911–917. [PMID: 27123681]
  13. Irwin, D. E., & Yeomans, J. M. (1986). Sensory registration and informational persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 343–360. [PMID: 2943863]
  14. Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 228–242. [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y]
  15. Kiyonaga, A., Egner, T., & Soto, D. (2012). Cognitive control over working memory biases of selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 639–646. [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0253-7]
  16. Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Kessler, Y., & Oberauer, K. (2018). The removal of information from working memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1424, 33–44. [DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13714]
  17. Lowery, A., & McDonald, J. J. (2023). Revisiting the automaticity of reading: Electrophysiological recordings show that Stroop words capture spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152, 309–321. [DOI: 10.1037/xge0001260]
  18. Olivers, C. N. L. (2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1275–1291. [PMID: 19803636]
  19. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243–1265. [PMID: 17002535]
  20. Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334. [PMID: 21665518]
  21. Pan, Y. (2010a). Attentional capture by working memory contents. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 124–128. [DOI: 10.1037/a0019109]
  22. Pan, Y. (2010b). Effects of verbal memory on visual selection: Dimension-based automatic guidance of attention (in Chinese). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 1118–1127. [DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.01118]
  23. Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2010). The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of attention. Vision Research, 50, 1437–1444. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.016]
  24. Pan, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Visual working memory enhances target discrimination accuracy with single-item displays. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3005–3012. [DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02041-y]
  25. Pan, Y., Xu, B., & Soto, D. (2009). Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1123–1131. [DOI: 10.1080/17470210802624353]
  26. Pan, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, W. (2019). The contents of visual working memory delay the perceived offset of matching visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 201, 102954. [DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102954]
  27. Sasin, E., Morey, C. C., & Nieuwenstein, M. (2017). Forget me if you can: Attentional capture by to-be-remembered and to-be-forgotten visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1643–1650. [DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1225-0]
  28. Sasin, E., & Fougnie, D. (2020). Memory-driven capture occurs for individual features of an object. Scientific Reports, 10, 19499. [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76431-5]
  29. Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 730–737. [PMID: 17563233]
  30. Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261. [PMID: 15826228]
  31. Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007]
  32. Thayer, D. D., Bahle, B., & Hollingworth, A. (2022). Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1018–1034. [DOI: 10.1037/xge0001116]
  33. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 83–90. [DOI: 10.3758/BF03211619]
  34. van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1450–1464. [PMID: 24730738]
  35. Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3–24. [DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3]
  36. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 363–377. [PMID: 17469973]
  37. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121–134. [PMID: 2137514]
  38. Zhang, B., Zhang, J. X., Huang, S., Kong, L., & Wang, S. (2011). Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory. Vision Research, 51, 2356–2361. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.008]

MeSH Term

Humans
Attention
Memory, Short-Term
Young Adult
Male
Female
Adult
Visual Perception
Reaction Time
Color Perception
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attentionworddistractorfocusdistractorsworkingvisualcapturefocusedcanmemorymemory-drivenmemory-matchingwhetherpresentedwithinobserversattentionalHoweverstatepresentperformancesampleirrelevantoutsideAttentioncapturedpresencematchcurrentcontentfieldwellestablishedadoptdiffusedsettingsprioronsetremainsunclearoccurstudyattemptedaddressquestionexaminingdisrupttaskParticipantsaskedholdnamecentralcolorignoringdisplayExperiments12alwayscentrallyExperiment3eithercenterperipheryieresultsshowedinterferedcolor-namingmatchedheldinterferenceeffectobservedfindingsindicatedependscruciallypositionedMemory-driven

Similar Articles

Cited By