Exploring differences between gender expressions in exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise in individuals with stroke.

Elise Wiley, Kevin Moncion, Lynden Rodrigues, Hanna Fang, Kenneth S Noguchi, Marc Roig, Julie Richardson, Joy C MacDermid, Ada Tang
Author Information
  1. Elise Wiley: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  2. Kevin Moncion: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  3. Lynden Rodrigues: Feil and Oberfeld Research Centre, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
  4. Hanna Fang: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  5. Kenneth S Noguchi: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  6. Marc Roig: Feil and Oberfeld Research Centre, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
  7. Julie Richardson: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  8. Joy C MacDermid: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  9. Ada Tang: School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. ORCID

Abstract

Gender expression may be associated with exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise in the general population. Exercising for challenge and enjoyment are associated with the instrumental traits typically held by individuals with masculine gender expressions. Conversely, exercising for weight loss to receive validation from others are in line with the expressive traits most commonly held by individuals with feminine gender expressions. Moreover, possessing neither dominant nor expressive traits (undifferentiated gender expressions) have been linked to poorer psychological outcomes. Exercise is important after stroke, but gender differences in psychosocial factors for exercise in this population were unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore whether gender expression differences exist in exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise post-stroke. Gender expression (masculine, feminine, androgynous, undifferentiated) was assessed using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory-12 (BSRI-12) in 67 individuals with stroke. Self-efficacy and outcomes expectations for exercise were assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Physical Activity Scale and Short Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale, respectively. One-way analysis of covariance models were conducted, adjusting for biological sex, age, and time post-stroke. There were differences in exercise self-efficacy across the four gender expression groups (F(3,60) = 4.28, p<0.01), where individuals with masculine gender expressions had higher self-efficacy than those with undifferentiated gender expressions (adjusted mean: 3.56 [SE: 0.17] vs. 2.72 [SE:0.18], p<0.01). There were no differences in outcome expectations for exercise (F(3,57) = 1.08, p = 0.36) between gender expressions. In our pairwise comparisons, we found that individuals with masculine gender expressions had higher exercise self-efficacy than individuals possessing undifferentiated gender expressions. Strategies to enhance exercise self-efficacy after stroke are needed, particularly for individuals with undifferentiated gender expression. There were no associations between gender expression and outcome expectations for exercise after stroke. Clinicians may continue reinforcing the positive expectations towards exercise across all gender expressions.

References

  1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Apr;42(2):155-62 [PMID: 4823550]
  2. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 May;106(5):698-705 [PMID: 16647327]
  3. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):315-22 [PMID: 18566948]
  4. J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Jun 01;10(2):274-82 [PMID: 24149872]
  5. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):452-457 [PMID: 33493049]
  6. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000 Apr;28(2):85-8 [PMID: 10902091]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975 Jul;32(1):29-39 [PMID: 1206468]
  8. Can J Aging. 2016 Sep;35(3):348-60 [PMID: 27477107]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 4;17(1):624 [PMID: 28676081]
  10. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7(2):176-83 [PMID: 20484756]
  11. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):135-42 [PMID: 20160159]
  12. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Nov;8(8):1074-83 [PMID: 22039125]
  13. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;53(24):1515-1525 [PMID: 29743171]
  14. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3:CD003316 [PMID: 32196635]
  15. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004 Sep-Oct;13(5):214-9 [PMID: 17903978]
  16. Int J Lib Arts Soc Sci. 2014 Jun;2(5):65-76 [PMID: 27668243]
  17. Scott Med J. 1957 May;2(5):200-15 [PMID: 13432835]
  18. J Aging Phys Act. 2007 Apr;15(2):206-18 [PMID: 17556786]
  19. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1857-68 [PMID: 24377329]
  20. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Oct 30;27(20):1213-23 [PMID: 16298923]
  21. J Gerontol Nurs. 2000 Mar;26(3):34-42 [PMID: 11111629]
  22. Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):510-20 [PMID: 16846326]
  23. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1876-1889 [PMID: 29056502]
  24. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2532-53 [PMID: 24846875]
  25. Int J Stroke. 2013 Jul;8(5):357-64 [PMID: 22974010]
  26. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 19;10:2145 [PMID: 31632315]
  27. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Feb;41(1):71-82 [PMID: 20827519]
  28. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Mar;63(1):60-6 [PMID: 1574662]
  29. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 27;16(1):145 [PMID: 27788671]
  30. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143-64 [PMID: 15090118]
  31. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2011 Fall;5(2):91-8 [PMID: 24644452]
  32. Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2016 Jul 04;9(Suppl 1):47-56 [PMID: 27398045]
  33. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173463 [PMID: 28273158]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3): [PMID: 36767151]
  35. Psychiatr Pol. 2013 Jan-Feb;47(1):53-64 [PMID: 23888744]
  36. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 Sep;21(9):438-47 [PMID: 10548080]
  37. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 Nov;55(6):S352-6 [PMID: 11078112]
  38. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Mar;37(2):206-12 [PMID: 20189926]
  39. Rehabil Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):15-21 [PMID: 16422040]
  40. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 03;11(6):e0156828 [PMID: 27258050]
  41. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Jan;24(1):16-25 [PMID: 20026574]
  42. BMC Public Health. 2018 Sep 5;18(1):1097 [PMID: 30185171]
  43. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2001 Dec;23(4):268-280 [PMID: 28682199]
  44. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Jan;64(1):33-40 [PMID: 19181688]
  45. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]
  46. Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):669-78 [PMID: 19430928]
  47. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 May;47(3):211-8 [PMID: 25801588]
  48. Can J Aging. 2009 Jun;28(2):135-46 [PMID: 19860972]
  49. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Dec;31(12):1561-1572 [PMID: 28523989]
  50. J Women Aging. 2005;17(1-2):55-70 [PMID: 15914419]
  51. Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):3299-307 [PMID: 19713543]
  52. Gerontologist. 1991 Aug;31(4):534-42 [PMID: 1894158]
  53. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 02;8(10):e76356 [PMID: 24098482]
  54. Arthritis. 2013;2013:621396 [PMID: 24260714]
  55. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):e0228191 [PMID: 32004330]
  56. Diabetes Educ. 2007 Jan-Feb;33(1):128-43 [PMID: 17272799]
  57. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2011 Sep 6;18(9):520-530 [PMID: 23255881]
  58. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Nov;47(11):2473-9 [PMID: 26473759]
  59. Circ Res. 2022 Feb 18;130(4):512-528 [PMID: 35175851]
  60. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9114 [PMID: 33907237]
  61. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;44(3):179-187 [PMID: 32516297]
  62. Trials. 2022 May 24;23(1):442 [PMID: 35610659]
  63. Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3093-3100 [PMID: 28931620]
  64. Phys Ther. 2022 Jun 3;102(6): [PMID: 35194641]
  65. Psychosom Med. 2016 Sep;78(7):788-804 [PMID: 27359170]
  66. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2011 Jul;5(4): [PMID: 24353482]
  67. Can J Occup Ther. 2009 Apr;76(2):73-80 [PMID: 19456085]
  68. Rehabil Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(6):253-60, 262 [PMID: 18065147]

MeSH Term

Humans
Male
Female
Gender Identity
Self Efficacy
Motivation
Masculinity
Femininity
Exercise