Evaluating radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in confined spaces: a systematic review of recent studies and future directions.

Muhammad Ahsan Ashraf, Turgay Celik
Author Information
  1. Muhammad Ahsan Ashraf: Sibanye-Stillwater Digital Mining Laboratory (DigiMine), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.
  2. Turgay Celik: School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.

Abstract

This study reviews recent research on Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposure in confined environments, focusing on methodologies and parameters. Studies typically evaluate RF-EMF exposure using an electric field and specific absorption rate but fail to consider temperature rise in the tissues in confined environments. The study highlights the investigation of RF-EMF exposure in subterranean environments such as subways, tunnels and mines. Future research should evaluate the exposure of communication devices in such environments, considering the surrounding environment. Such studies will aid in understanding the risks and developing effective mitigation strategies to protect workers and the general public.

References

  1. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020 Dec 30;192(1):1-13 [PMID: 33230555]
  2. Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;23(4): [PMID: 36850949]
  3. Environ Pollut. 2021 Aug 1;282:116952 [PMID: 33862271]
  4. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2022 Jul 1;198(8):491-502 [PMID: 35718697]
  5. Environ Res. 2020 Dec;191:109940 [PMID: 33181972]
  6. Environ Int. 2022 Jan 15;159:106972 [PMID: 34953282]
  7. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020 Jan;41(1):3-20 [PMID: 31854006]
  8. Environ Int. 2021 Nov;156:106711 [PMID: 34153890]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15): [PMID: 34360361]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;16(12): [PMID: 31200442]
  11. Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 3):160008 [PMID: 36368387]
  12. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 02;21(11): [PMID: 34199446]
  13. Environ Res. 2019 Jan;168:428-438 [PMID: 30390565]
  14. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;28(2):147-160 [PMID: 28766560]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:1544-1551 [PMID: 30857115]
  16. Environ Res. 2019 May;172:109-116 [PMID: 30782530]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 12;15(10): [PMID: 30321997]
  18. Open Med (Wars). 2021 Nov 03;16(1):1628-1641 [PMID: 34761114]
  19. Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt D):113577 [PMID: 35636463]
  20. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Oct;36(7):538-43 [PMID: 26223661]
  21. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4): [PMID: 33673014]
  22. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 15;22(18): [PMID: 36146331]
  23. Environ Res. 2020 Apr;183:109188 [PMID: 32032813]
  24. Oncol Lett. 2018 May;15(5):7871-7883 [PMID: 29725476]
  25. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Jan;24(1):63-5 [PMID: 12483666]
  26. Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524 [PMID: 32167495]
  27. Environ Res. 2019 Aug;175:266-273 [PMID: 31146098]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 17;16(6): [PMID: 30884917]
  29. Appl Nanosci. 2023;13(3):1807-1817 [PMID: 35096498]
  30. Phys Med Biol. 2021 Apr 14;66(8): [PMID: 33761473]
  31. Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:110902 [PMID: 33737079]
  32. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460 [PMID: 24772662]
  33. Environ Int. 2018 May;114:297-306 [PMID: 29529581]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2): [PMID: 35055741]
  35. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2022 Mar 30;198(4):197-207 [PMID: 35229159]
  36. Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 03;9:794564 [PMID: 35186873]
  37. Environ Int. 2016 Sep;94:724-735 [PMID: 27356850]
  38. Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt B):113252 [PMID: 35421393]
  39. Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:493-499 [PMID: 30690250]

Grants

  1. /Sibanye-Stillwater Digital Mining Laboratory
  2. /Wits Mining Institute

MeSH Term

Electromagnetic Fields
Humans
Radio Waves
Environmental Exposure
Radiation Monitoring
Occupational Exposure

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exposureenvironmentsRF-EMFconfinedstudyrecentresearchevaluatefieldstudiesreviewsRadiofrequencyElectromagneticFieldfocusingmethodologiesparametersStudiestypicallyusingelectricspecificabsorptionratefailconsidertemperaturerisetissueshighlightsinvestigationsubterraneansubwaystunnelsminesFuturecommunicationdevicesconsideringsurroundingenvironmentwillaidunderstandingrisksdevelopingeffectivemitigationstrategiesprotectworkersgeneralpublicEvaluatingradiofrequencyelectromagneticspaces:systematicreviewfuturedirections

Similar Articles

Cited By