Brentuximab vedotin and chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Julia Driessen, Fer de Wit, Alex F Herrera, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Ann S LaCasce, Peter D Cole, Craig H Moskowitz, Ramón García-Sanz, Michael Fuchs, Horst Müller, Peter Borchmann, Armando Santoro, Heiko Schöder, Josée M Zijlstra, Barbara A Hutten, Alison J Moskowitz, Marie José Kersten
Author Information
  1. Julia Driessen: Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, and LYMMCARE Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Fer de Wit: Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, and LYMMCARE Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Alex F Herrera: Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA. ORCID
  4. Pier Luigi Zinzani: IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna, Italy. ORCID
  5. Ann S LaCasce: Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. ORCID
  6. Peter D Cole: Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. ORCID
  7. Craig H Moskowitz: Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL.
  8. Ramón García-Sanz: Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC, Universidad Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain. ORCID
  9. Michael Fuchs: German Hodgkin Study Group and Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  10. Horst Müller: German Hodgkin Study Group and Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  11. Peter Borchmann: German Hodgkin Study Group and Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  12. Armando Santoro: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy. ORCID
  13. Heiko Schöder: Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. ORCID
  14. Josée M Zijlstra: Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  15. Barbara A Hutten: Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  16. Alison J Moskowitz: Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
  17. Marie José Kersten: Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, and LYMMCARE Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Several single-arm studies have explored the inclusion of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, no head-to-head comparisons with standard salvage chemotherapy have been performed. This study presents a propensity score-matched analysis encompassing individual patient data from 10 clinical trials to evaluate the impact of BV in transplant-eligible patients with R/R cHL. We included 768 patients, of whom 386 were treated with BV with or without chemotherapy (BV cohort), whereas 382 received chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy cohort). Propensity score matching resulted in balanced cohorts of 240 patients each. No significant differences were observed in pre-ASCT complete metabolic response (CMR) rates (P = .69) or progression free survival (PFS; P = .14) between the BV and chemotherapy cohorts. However, in the BV vs chemotherapy cohort, patients with relapsed disease had a significantly better 3-year PFS of 80% vs 70%, respectively (P = .02), whereas there was no difference for patients with primary refractory disease (56% vs 62%, respectively; P = .67). Patients with stage IV disease achieved a significantly better 3-year PFS in the BV cohort (P = .015). Post-ASCT PFS was comparable for patients achieving a CMR after BV monotherapy and those receiving BV followed by sequential chemotherapy (P = .24). Although 3-year overall survival was higher in the BV cohort (92% vs 80%, respectively; P < .001), this is likely attributed to the use of other novel therapies in later lines for patients experiencing progression, given that studies in the BV cohort were conducted more recently. In conclusion, BV with or without salvage chemotherapy appears to enhance PFS in patients with relapsed disease but not in those with primary refractory cHL.

References

  1. Lancet. 1993 Apr 24;341(8852):1051-4 [PMID: 8096958]
  2. Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):724-730 [PMID: 29272364]
  3. Leukemia. 2022 Mar;36(3):772-780 [PMID: 34628472]
  4. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Jan;2(1):48-58 [PMID: 11902585]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;39(28):3109-3117 [PMID: 34170745]
  6. Blood. 2001 Feb 1;97(3):616-23 [PMID: 11157476]
  7. Haematologica. 2021 Apr 01;106(4):1129-1137 [PMID: 32273476]
  8. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2125-2132 [PMID: 28441111]
  9. Blood. 2012 Feb 16;119(7):1665-70 [PMID: 22184409]
  10. Blood. 2023 Jun 1;141(22):2727-2737 [PMID: 36857637]
  11. Blood. 2018 Jul 5;132(1):40-48 [PMID: 29703778]
  12. Blood Adv. 2023 Dec 12;7(23):7295-7303 [PMID: 37729621]
  13. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Dec;21(12):2136-2140 [PMID: 26211987]
  14. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1229-1238 [PMID: 30122620]
  15. Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):612-620 [PMID: 30657848]
  16. Leukemia. 2022 Dec;36(12):2853-2862 [PMID: 36241696]
  17. Blood. 2022 Jun 23;139(25):3605-3616 [PMID: 35316328]
  18. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1283-94 [PMID: 27451390]
  19. Blood. 2021 Aug 12;138(6):427-438 [PMID: 33827139]
  20. Blood. 2003 Aug 15;102(4):1458-65 [PMID: 12714494]
  21. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 25;378(4):331-344 [PMID: 29224502]
  22. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Jun;59(6):1413-1419 [PMID: 29045163]
  23. Br J Haematol. 2010 Mar;148(6):890-7 [PMID: 20085577]
  24. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):284-92 [PMID: 25683846]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68 [PMID: 25113753]
  26. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jan;61(1):176-180 [PMID: 31437057]
  27. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):100 [PMID: 31827067]
  28. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):240-246 [PMID: 34889399]
  29. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):512-524 [PMID: 33721562]
  30. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3293-9 [PMID: 27382096]
  31. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 28;387(4):310-320 [PMID: 35830649]
  32. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2020 May;9(2):79-88 [PMID: 32494554]
  33. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;21(5):841-54 [PMID: 17908623]
  34. Lancet. 2002 Jun 15;359(9323):2065-71 [PMID: 12086759]
  35. Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 17;10:749 [PMID: 31379564]
  36. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 1;28(34):5074-80 [PMID: 20975066]
  37. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 20;30(18):2183-9 [PMID: 22454421]
  38. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Mar 1;26(5):1034-1044 [PMID: 31811017]
  39. Blood. 2017 Nov 16;130(20):2196-2203 [PMID: 28874350]

Grants

  1. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS
  2. U10 CA180886/NCI NIH HHS
  3. U10 CA180899/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Hodgkin Disease
Brentuximab Vedotin
Propensity Score
Male
Female
Adult
Middle Aged
Salvage Therapy
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Recurrence
Young Adult
Adolescent
Treatment Outcome
Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

Chemicals

Brentuximab Vedotin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BVchemotherapypatientscohortP =PFSvsdiseasesalvagecHL3-yearrespectivelystudiesvedotinfollowedrelapsed/refractoryR/RHodgkinHoweverpropensityscore-matchedanalysiswithoutwhereascohortsCMRprogressionsurvivalrelapsedsignificantlybetter80%primaryrefractoryABSTRACT:Severalsingle-armexploredinclusionbrentuximabautologousstemcelltransplantationASCTclassicallymphomahead-to-headcomparisonsstandardperformedstudypresentsencompassingindividualpatientdata10clinicaltrialsevaluateimpacttransplant-eligibleincluded768386treated382receivedalonePropensityscorematchingresultedbalanced240significantdifferencesobservedpre-ASCTcompletemetabolicresponserates69free1470%02difference56%62%67PatientsstageIVachieved015Post-ASCTcomparableachievingmonotherapyreceivingsequential24Althoughoverallhigher92%P <001likelyattributedusenoveltherapieslaterlinesexperiencinggivenconductedrecentlyconclusionappearsenhanceBrentuximablymphoma:

Similar Articles

Cited By