Evaluating the impact of movement tracking feedback on engagement with home exercise programmes of children with cerebral palsy using a new therapy app: a protocol for a mixed-methods single-case experimental design with alternating treatments.

Marina Petrevska, F Virginia Wright, Ajmal Khan, Sarah Munce, Darcy Fehlings, Elaine Biddiss
Author Information
  1. Marina Petrevska: Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  2. F Virginia Wright: Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  3. Ajmal Khan: Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  4. Sarah Munce: Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  5. Darcy Fehlings: Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  6. Elaine Biddiss: Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ebiddiss@hollandbloorview.ca. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) are prescribed home exercise programmes (HEPs) to increase the frequency of movement practice, yet adherence to HEPs can be low. This paper outlines the protocol for a single-case experimental design (SCED) with alternating treatments, using a new home therapy exercise application, Bootle Boot Camp (BBCamp), offered with and without movement tracking feedback. This study will explore the impact of feedback on engagement, movement quality, lower limb function and family experiences to help understand how technology-supported HEPs should be translated and the added value, if any, of movement tracking technology.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study using a SCED, 16 children with CP (aged 6-12 years, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I-II) will set lower limb goals and be prescribed an individualised HEP by their physiotherapist to complete using BBCamp on their home television equipped with a three-dimensional camera-computer system. Children will complete four���weekly exercise sessions over 6���weeks. Children will be randomised to 1 of 16 alternating treatment schedules where BBCamp will provide or withhold feedback during the first 4���weeks. The version of BBCamp that results in the most therapeutic benefit will be continued for 2 final weeks. Goals will be re-evaluated and families interviewed. The primary outcome is adherence (proportion of prescribed exercise repetitions attempted) as a measure of behavioural engagement. Secondary outcomes are affective and cognitive engagement (smiley face ratings), exercise fidelity, lower limb function, goal achievement and participant experiences. SCED data will be analysed using visual and statistical methods. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated using joint displays.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Boards at Bloorview Research Institute and the University of Toronto. Results will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05998239; pre-results.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05998239

References

  1. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179 [PMID: 29253607]
  2. Arch Dis Child. 2007 Nov;92(11):987-91 [PMID: 17573409]
  3. BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e040108 [PMID: 33371023]
  4. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 6;10(10):e035454 [PMID: 33028544]
  5. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jan;43(1):85-97 [PMID: 31131641]
  6. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8):1448-56 [PMID: 22571917]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7 [PMID: 23295957]
  8. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Dec;43(24):3445-3453 [PMID: 32320305]
  9. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56 [PMID: 24279835]
  10. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Oct;62(10):1154-1160 [PMID: 32491226]
  11. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81 [PMID: 18929686]
  12. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 18;10(8):e37290 [PMID: 35980732]
  13. Glob Pediatr Health. 2016 Apr 26;3:2333794X16644139 [PMID: 27336015]
  14. BMC Neurol. 2015 May 10;15:75 [PMID: 25956055]
  15. Pediatr Nurs. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-17 [PMID: 3344163]
  16. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014 Sep;18(5):609-17 [PMID: 24813657]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523 [PMID: 34785096]
  18. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003 Summer;15(2):84-92 [PMID: 17057438]
  19. Physiother Res Int. 2022 Jul;27(3):e1957 [PMID: 35592902]
  20. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016 Winter;28(4):475-82 [PMID: 27661247]
  21. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199-210 [PMID: 489478]
  22. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;34(2):212-219 [PMID: 35385456]
  23. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2015 Oct;32(4):349-70 [PMID: 26485738]
  24. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2000 Oct;12(10):413-26 [PMID: 11930440]
  25. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92-8 [PMID: 18416914]
  26. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018 Nov;38(4):382-394 [PMID: 28922044]
  27. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Dec;64(12):1494-1506 [PMID: 35952356]
  28. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):272-7 [PMID: 24930985]
  29. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  30. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Feb;76(2):676-686 [PMID: 31713252]
  31. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2004 Summer;16(2):90-8 [PMID: 17057533]
  32. Respir Care. 2019 Oct;64(10):1261-1269 [PMID: 31270178]
  33. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014 Feb;19(1):2-8 [PMID: 32878365]
  34. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0234767 [PMID: 32569284]
  35. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jun;57(6):521-9 [PMID: 25495539]
  36. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Feb;23(2):73-105 [PMID: 31411523]
  37. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011 Summer;23(2):159-69 [PMID: 21552079]
  38. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14(1):15-21 [PMID: 21241174]
  39. BMC Neurol. 2011 Mar 09;11:32 [PMID: 21392370]
  40. Am J Occup Ther. 2017 May/Jun;71(3):7103190040p1-7103190040p8 [PMID: 28422630]
  41. Nurse Res. 2012;19(2):6-10 [PMID: 22338802]
  42. BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 26;11:830 [PMID: 22029547]
  43. Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):214-23 [PMID: 22093667]
  44. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Aug;23(5 Suppl):S60-79 [PMID: 19620931]
  45. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 May;56(5):482-9 [PMID: 24843890]
  46. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Sep;61(9):1061-1066 [PMID: 30740648]
  47. J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208 [PMID: 31078660]
  48. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Nov;20(11):980-8 [PMID: 17065541]
  49. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Apr;39(4):214-23 [PMID: 9183258]
  50. Gerontology. 2015;62(1):118-24 [PMID: 26021781]
  51. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Mar-Apr;18(2):99-110 [PMID: 24839043]
  52. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Aug;47(8):518-24 [PMID: 16108451]
  53. Disabil Rehabil. 2007 May 30;29(10):761-6 [PMID: 17457734]
  54. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e018316 [PMID: 29362255]
  55. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27 [PMID: 25760773]
  56. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2018 Nov;38(4):417-426 [PMID: 28753053]
  57. Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;96(7):e1-e10 [PMID: 27371692]
  58. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016 Nov;36(4):343-58 [PMID: 26606419]
  59. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Oct;41(20):2369-2391 [PMID: 29756481]
  60. Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):480-504 [PMID: 28301199]
  61. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e21094 [PMID: 33439147]
  62. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):45-51 [PMID: 30130519]
  63. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021;14(1):7-17 [PMID: 33104046]
  64. Qual Health Res. 2005 Jul;15(6):821-31 [PMID: 15961878]
  65. Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):467-78 [PMID: 18522057]
  66. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Apr 7;9(2):e23822 [PMID: 33825690]
  67. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2009 Jan 1;21(S1):S116-S129 [PMID: 20209028]
  68. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jul;26(7):664-71 [PMID: 22080526]
  69. Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61 [PMID: 26553895]

MeSH Term

Child
Humans
Cerebral Palsy
Research Design
Feedback
Mobile Applications
Exercise Therapy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0willexerciseusingmovementhomeBBCampfeedbackengagementChildrenprescribedHEPsSCEDalternatingtrackinglowerlimbcerebralpalsyCPprogrammesadherenceprotocolsingle-caseexperimentaldesigntreatmentsnewtherapystudyimpactfunctionexperiencesANDmixed-methods16childrencompletedataResearchINTRODUCTION:increasefrequencypracticeyetcanlowpaperoutlinesapplicationBootleBootCampofferedwithoutexplorequalityfamilyhelpunderstandtechnology-supportedtranslatedaddedvaluetechnologyMETHODSANALYSIS:explanatorysequentialaged6-12yearsGrossMotorFunctionClassificationSystemlevelsI-IIsetgoalsindividualisedHEPphysiotherapisttelevisionequippedthree-dimensionalcamera-computersystemfour���weeklysessions6���weeksrandomised1treatmentschedulesprovidewithholdfirst4���weeksversionresultstherapeuticbenefitcontinued2finalweeksGoalsre-evaluatedfamiliesinterviewedprimaryoutcomeproportionrepetitionsattemptedmeasurebehaviouralSecondaryoutcomesaffectivecognitivesmileyfaceratingsfidelitygoalachievementparticipantanalysedvisualstatisticalmethodsQuantitativequalitativeintegratedjointdisplaysETHICSDISSEMINATION:EthicalapprovalobtainedEthicsBoardsBloorviewInstituteUniversityTorontoResultsdistributedpeer-reviewedjournalsscientificconferencesTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:NCT05998239pre-resultsEvaluatingapp:Developmentalneurology&neurodisabilityPAEDIATRICSREHABILITATIONMEDICINEVirtualReality

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.