Influence of endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway for general anesthesia on perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Yanan Jia, Yu Zhang, Zihan Wang, Wei Pan, Haifeng Fu, Wenwen Du
Author Information
  1. Yanan Jia: Department of Anesthesiology, Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  2. Yu Zhang: Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  3. Zihan Wang: Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  4. Wei Pan: Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  5. Haifeng Fu: Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
  6. Wenwen Du: Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Abstract

Background: To compare perioperative adverse events between general anesthesia with endotracheal tube (ETT) and general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Materials and Methods: This was a large sample retrospective, propensity score-matched (PSM) study. We collected the data of 6739 female patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 2016 and June 2021 in our hospital, China. Patients were divided into two groups (ETT group and LMA group) according to different airway management modes. Data on all perioperative adverse events were collected. PSM analysis was performed to control confounding factors and differences in baseline values between the two groups. Finally, 4150 female patients were recruited after PSM.
Results: The total number of patients taking intraoperative vasoactive drugs during surgery was higher in the ETT group than in the LMA group ( = 0.04). The LMA group had a higher incidence of vomiting (51 [2.46%]) and somnolence (165 [7.95]) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) than the ETT group (71 [3.42%] and 102 [4.92%], respectively) ( = 0.02 and < 0.001). Hypothermia was significantly higher in the LMA group (183 [10.36%]) than in the ETT group (173 [8.34%]) in the PACU ( = 0.03). The number of patients with sore throat was significantly higher in the ETT group (434 [20.02%]) than in the LMA group (299 [14.41%]) in the ward ( < 0.001). Other variables such as hypoxemia, moderate to severe pain, abdominal distension, diarrhea, sleep disorders, wound bleeding, and skin itch were not significantly different between the two groups ( > 0.05).
Conclusion: The ETT group had more incidences of vomiting, sore throat, and cough complications and needed more drug treatment than the LMA group. LMA is a better airway management mode and LMA general anesthesia can be safely used in patients undergoing laparoscopic nonemergency hysterectomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2813-2837 [PMID: 35953660]
  2. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jun;106(6):832-9 [PMID: 21558068]
  3. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Oct;68(10):2359-76 [PMID: 20674126]
  4. Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):252-8 [PMID: 12883396]
  5. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):181 [PMID: 34182933]
  6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):118.e1-8 [PMID: 20522410]
  7. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr 5;21(1):101 [PMID: 33820541]
  8. Laryngoscope. 2004 Apr;114(4):652-5 [PMID: 15064618]
  9. Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Mar 14;12(1):e120478 [PMID: 35433385]
  10. J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060520902606 [PMID: 32036718]
  11. JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Mar 1;177(3):311-318 [PMID: 36716016]
  12. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):5 [PMID: 33407130]
  13. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;88(4):582-4 [PMID: 12066737]
  14. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 19;14:56 [PMID: 25061426]
  15. Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Apr;29(2):601-5 [PMID: 24353586]
  16. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):576-80 [PMID: 17617554]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 27;370(9):883-4 [PMID: 24571770]
  18. Reprod Health. 2019 Aug 2;16(1):118 [PMID: 31375139]
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 15;11:CD009901 [PMID: 30536850]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003314 [PMID: 15846656]
  21. Anesthesiology. 2012 Aug;117(2):309-20 [PMID: 22614132]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupLMAETTpatients0generalanesthesiaairwayeventslaparoscopichysterectomyhigherperioperativeadverseendotracheallaryngealmaskundergoingPSMtwogroups=significantlytubepropensityscore-matchedcollectedfemaledifferentmanagementanalysisnumbervomitingPACU<001sorethroatBackground:compareMaterialsMethods:largesampleretrospectivestudydata6739underwentJanuary2016June2021hospitalChinaPatientsdividedaccordingmodesDataperformedcontrolconfoundingfactorsdifferencesbaselinevaluesFinally4150recruitedResults:totaltakingintraoperativevasoactivedrugssurgery04incidence51[246%]somnolence165[795]postanesthesiacareunit71[342%]102[492%]respectively02Hypothermia183[1036%]173[834%]03434[2002%]299[1441%]wardvariableshypoxemiamoderateseverepainabdominaldistensiondiarrheasleepdisorderswoundbleedingskinitch>05Conclusion:incidencescoughcomplicationsneededdrugtreatmentbettermodecansafelyusednonemergencyInfluencehysterectomy:Adverse

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.