Differences and relationships between talent detection, identification, development and selection in sport: A systematic review.

Jie Zhao, Changqing Xiang, Tengku Fadilah Tengku Kamalden, Wenting Dong, Hua Luo, Normala Ismail
Author Information
  1. Jie Zhao: Faculty of Physical Education, Guangdong Technology College, Zhaoqing, 526100, China.
  2. Changqing Xiang: Department of Sport Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.
  3. Tengku Fadilah Tengku Kamalden: National Sports Institute (ISN), National Sports Complex, Bukit Jalil, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  4. Wenting Dong: Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603, KL, Malaysia.
  5. Hua Luo: Department of Sport Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.
  6. Normala Ismail: Department of Science & Technical Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia.

Abstract

Although there are numerous studies on talent, especially talent identification, development, and selection, both on influencing factors and model construction or talent prediction, they have relatively independently explored some of its stages. Undeniably, talent development is continuous and phased, with specific tasks to be completed at each step, and these steps have certain differences and relationships. The aim of this review is to provide a clear distinction between the entire talent cultivation process, with the purpose of having better methods and measures for each stage to minimize the turnover rate and ensure the integrity of the talent development process. Through searching the Web of Science ™ database, this review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Selected were original articles in English containing data or models related to talent detection/identification/development/selection in sports. A total of 16 articles were included in the study by reviewing the literature. This overview presents the differences and relationships between the four stages of talent cultivation, where these different aspects are aim, purpose, approach, and emphasis. The relationship is characterized by continuity, progressive, complementary, and mutually. This finding shows that each stage is not developed independently, but is an integral part of the talent training process. Additionally, better differentiation and strengthening of the links between the various talent cultivation stages are considered to contribute to elite athlete development. This review highlights the differences and relationships that exist at each stage of talent cultivation. Meanwhile, some measures are also proposed to strengthen the connection of these phases and how to reduce the turnover rate of talent, which can provide theoretical references for coaches or stakeholders. Based on the results of the review, it is also recommended that future research on talent cultivation could take into account the intrinsic linkages between the various stages and develop talent training programs in a multidimensional way.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Aug 16;4:988631 [PMID: 36051964]
  2. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Oct;21(10):1073-1078 [PMID: 29789264]
  3. J Sports Sci. 2009 Feb 1;27(3):257-66 [PMID: 19153859]
  4. J Sports Sci. 2009 Nov;27(13):1367-80 [PMID: 19787538]
  5. Sports Med. 2008;38(9):703-14 [PMID: 18712939]
  6. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(5):452-60 [PMID: 24050461]
  7. Sports Med. 2016 Aug;46(8):1041-58 [PMID: 26842017]
  8. Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1141159 [PMID: 37303914]
  9. Sports Med. 2014 Nov;44(11):1489-503 [PMID: 25015477]
  10. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;49(13):878-82 [PMID: 25907182]
  11. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:948121 [PMID: 35898997]
  12. Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 15;11:664 [PMID: 32351427]
  13. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013 Dec;25(6):653-8 [PMID: 24240283]
  14. J Sports Sci. 2000 Sep;18(9):657-67 [PMID: 11043892]
  15. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  16. Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):907-931 [PMID: 29299878]
  17. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Apr;11(3):370-6 [PMID: 26308489]
  18. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Mar;5(1):103-16 [PMID: 20308701]
  19. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Oct;19(5):646-54 [PMID: 18694430]
  20. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(5):357-66 [PMID: 25143133]
  21. Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2925 [PMID: 31998188]
  22. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 30;12:667542 [PMID: 33995226]
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):35-73 [PMID: 19123262]
  24. Sports Med Open. 2022 Jan 29;8(1):17 [PMID: 35094150]
  25. Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:593063 [PMID: 33584429]
  26. Mitochondrion. 2019 Jul;47:125-138 [PMID: 31228565]
  27. Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Dec 07;2:596369 [PMID: 33345177]
  28. J Sports Sci. 2009 Feb 15;27(4):397-404 [PMID: 19191166]
  29. J Sports Sci. 2004 May;22(5):395-408 [PMID: 15160593]
  30. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Oct;18(9):1191-1198 [PMID: 29856681]
  31. J Sports Sci. 2018 Dec;36(23):2716-2723 [PMID: 28417687]
  32. J Sports Sci. 2011 Sep;29(12):1353-6 [PMID: 21864014]
  33. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016 Oct;16(7):837-44 [PMID: 26923813]
  34. Sports Med. 2010 Apr 1;40(4):271-83 [PMID: 20364873]
  35. Med Sport Sci. 2016;61:41-54 [PMID: 27287076]
  36. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):691-722 [PMID: 32196409]
  37. Sports Med. 2021 Jun;51(6):1115-1122 [PMID: 33675517]
  38. Sports (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;10(12): [PMID: 36548486]
  39. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):61-88 [PMID: 15629068]
  40. Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Jun;21(3):399-407; discussion 407-42 [PMID: 10097018]
  41. Sports Med. 2018 Jan;48(1):97-109 [PMID: 29082463]
  42. Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 06;5(2):eaat7603 [PMID: 30775433]
  43. J Sports Sci. 2006 Oct;24(10):1065-73 [PMID: 17115521]
  44. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Aug;26(8):933-42 [PMID: 26302717]
  45. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206151 [PMID: 30403711]
  46. Entropy (Basel). 2020 Dec 18;22(12): [PMID: 33353084]
  47. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Sep 13;3:715310 [PMID: 34589703]
  48. Am J Hum Biol. 1998;10(6):791-798 [PMID: 28561412]
  49. Sports Med. 2020 Sep;50(9):1593-1611 [PMID: 32495253]
  50. Sports Med Open. 2019 Nov 21;5(1):44 [PMID: 31754845]
  51. J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Sep;22(9):1021-1029 [PMID: 31221597]
  52. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013 May 31;4:151-60 [PMID: 24379720]