Applicability and usefulness of pupillometry in the study of lexical access. A scoping review of primary research.

Carlos Rojas, Yuri E Vega-Rodríguez, Gabriel Lagos, María Gabriela Cabrera-Miguieles, Yasna Sandoval, Jaime Crisosto-Alarcón
Author Information
  1. Carlos Rojas: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
  2. Yuri E Vega-Rodríguez: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
  3. Gabriel Lagos: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
  4. María Gabriela Cabrera-Miguieles: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
  5. Yasna Sandoval: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.
  6. Jaime Crisosto-Alarcón: Department of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Bío-Bío, Chillán, Chile.

Abstract

Pupil dilation has been associated with the effort required to perform various cognitive tasks. At the lexical level, some studies suggest that this neurophysiological measure would provide objective, real-time information during word processing and lexical access. However, due to the scarcity and incipient advancement of this line of research, its applicability, use, and sensitivity are not entirely clear. This scoping review aims to determine the applicability and usefulness of pupillometry in the study of lexical access by providing an up-to-date overview of research in this area. Following the PRISMA protocol, 16 articles were included in this review. The results show that pupillometry is a highly applicable, useful, and sensitive method for assessing lexical skills of word recognition, word retrieval, and semantic activation. Moreover, it easily fits into traditional research paradigms and methods in the field. Because it is a non-invasive, objective, and automated procedure, it can be applied to any population or age group. However, the emerging development of this specific area of research and the methodological diversity observed in the included studies do not yet allow for definitive conclusions in this area, which in turn does not allow for meta-analyses or fully conclusive statements about what the pupil response actually reflects when processing words. Standardized pupillary recording and analysis methods need to be defined to generate more accurate, replicable research designs with more reliable results to strengthen this line of research.

Keywords

References

  1. Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jan;232(1):337-44 [PMID: 24162863]
  2. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Mar;10(3):211-23 [PMID: 19190638]
  3. Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 19;13(9): [PMID: 37759944]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1116-1124 [PMID: 28613135]
  5. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Aug;238:103985 [PMID: 37453281]
  6. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):18-27 [PMID: 26168419]
  7. Psychophysiology. 2022 Apr;59(4):e14035 [PMID: 35318693]
  8. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2008 Sep;6(3):235-53 [PMID: 19506723]
  9. Psychol Sci. 2021 Jan;32(1):80-95 [PMID: 33259742]
  10. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):340-57 [PMID: 6242411]
  11. PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0210450 [PMID: 31013266]
  12. Psychophysiology. 2015 Jun;52(6):754-69 [PMID: 25656874]
  13. Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):3055-3077 [PMID: 36028608]
  14. Psychophysiology. 2015 Oct;52(10):1305-16 [PMID: 26174940]
  15. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;223:107525 [PMID: 36403340]
  16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jun;24(6):466-480 [PMID: 32331857]
  17. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104658 [PMID: 31430569]
  18. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015 [PMID: 29435963]
  19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Oct;58(5):1508-20 [PMID: 26163655]
  20. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Dec;20(6):856-72 [PMID: 10484697]
  21. Trends Neurosci. 2022 Aug;45(8):635-647 [PMID: 35662511]
  22. Neuropsychologia. 2023 Jun 6;184:108548 [PMID: 36967042]
  23. Front Neural Circuits. 2018 Mar 09;12:21 [PMID: 29593504]
  24. Neuron. 2010 Sep 9;67(5):713-27 [PMID: 20826304]
  25. Brain Commun. 2023 Feb 21;5(2):fcad042 [PMID: 36910418]
  26. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 24;12(1):10764 [PMID: 35750700]
  27. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143 [PMID: 30453902]
  28. Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1930-1938 [PMID: 27924440]
  29. J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105146 [PMID: 33862526]
  30. Ear Hear. 1998 Feb;19(1):1-36 [PMID: 9504270]
  31. J Cogn. 2019 Feb 07;2(1):6 [PMID: 31517228]
  32. Dev Psychobiol. 2009 Mar;51(2):207-11 [PMID: 18988196]
  33. Brain Lang. 2020 Jul;206:104791 [PMID: 32339951]
  34. Curr Biol. 2021 Jan 11;31(1):R32-R34 [PMID: 33434486]
  35. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1 [PMID: 25554246]
  36. Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 26;20(13):3099-3112 [PMID: 28954227]
  37. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun;25:69-91 [PMID: 27908561]
  38. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  39. Conscious Cogn. 2021 Jul;92:103152 [PMID: 34022638]
  40. Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Jul;165:145-205 [PMID: 33766646]
  41. Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 Mar;52(1):77-86 [PMID: 15003374]
  42. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  43. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(2):90-95 [PMID: 29093614]
  44. Cortex. 2020 Mar;124:111-118 [PMID: 31865261]
  45. Dev Sci. 2019 Nov;22(6):e12832 [PMID: 30942933]
  46. Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan;50(1):23-34 [PMID: 23157603]
  47. Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1336-1342 [PMID: 29992408]
  48. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):268-280 [PMID: 34405386]
  49. Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1322-31 [PMID: 23468182]
  50. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 Aug;48(3):598-612 [PMID: 7568993]
  51. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Aug;65(2):132-40 [PMID: 17532075]
  52. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jul;22(7):1530-40 [PMID: 19642890]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchlexicalwordaccesspupillometryprocessingreviewareastudiesobjectiveHoweverlineapplicabilityscopingusefulnessstudyincludedresultsrecognitionretrievalsemanticmethodsallowPupildilationassociatedeffortrequiredperformvariouscognitivetaskslevelsuggestneurophysiologicalmeasureprovidereal-timeinformationduescarcityincipientadvancementusesensitivityentirelyclearaimsdetermineprovidingup-to-dateoverviewFollowingPRISMAprotocol16articlesshowhighlyapplicableusefulsensitivemethodassessingskillsactivationMoreovereasilyfitstraditionalparadigmsfieldnon-invasiveautomatedprocedurecanappliedpopulationagegroupemergingdevelopmentspecificmethodologicaldiversityobservedyetdefinitiveconclusionsturnmeta-analysesfullyconclusivestatementspupilresponseactuallyreflectswordsStandardizedpupillaryrecordinganalysisneeddefinedgenerateaccuratereplicabledesignsreliablestrengthenApplicabilityprimary

Similar Articles

Cited By