How young radiologists use contrast media and manage adverse reactions: an international survey.

Domenico Albano, Carmen Mallardi, Saif Afat, Paulo Moraes Agnollitto, Damiano Caruso, Roberto Cannella, Serena Carriero, Kalina Chupetlovska, Paola Clauser, Tommaso D'Angelo, Domenico De Santis, Marco Dioguardi Burgio, Ivo Dumic-Cule, Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Stefano Fusco, Marco Gatti, Salvatore Gitto, Sonja Jankovic, Tsvetomir Karagechev, Michail E Klontzas, Emmanouil Koltsakis, Doris Leithner, Vid Matišić, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Ralitsa Penkova, Michela Polici, Francesca Serpi, Carmelo Sofia, Ziga Snoj, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Federica Vernuccio, João Vieira, Ana Catarina Vieira, Mirjam Wielema, Marta Zerunian, Carmelo Messina
Author Information
  1. Domenico Albano: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. albanodomenico.md@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Carmen Mallardi: Scuola Di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  3. Saif Afat: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  4. Paulo Moraes Agnollitto: Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Radiology Division of the Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
  5. Damiano Caruso: Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  6. Roberto Cannella: Section of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  7. Serena Carriero: Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  8. Kalina Chupetlovska: Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  9. Paola Clauser: Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  10. Tommaso D'Angelo: Diagnostic and Inverventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
  11. Domenico De Santis: Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  12. Marco Dioguardi Burgio: Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP.Nord, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
  13. Ivo Dumic-Cule: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
  14. Salvatore Claudio Fanni: Department of Translational Research, Academic Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  15. Stefano Fusco: Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  16. Marco Gatti: Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  17. Salvatore Gitto: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
  18. Sonja Jankovic: Center for Radiology, University Clinical Center Nis, Nis, Republic of Serbia.
  19. Tsvetomir Karagechev: Department of Radiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  20. Michail E Klontzas: Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  21. Emmanouil Koltsakis: Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
  22. Doris Leithner: Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  23. Vid Matišić: St. Catherine Specialty Hospital, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
  24. Giuseppe Muscogiuri: Department of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
  25. Ralitsa Penkova: Radiology Department, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, 51B Nikola Y. Vaptsarov Blvd, Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria.
  26. Michela Polici: Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  27. Francesca Serpi: Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  28. Carmelo Sofia: Diagnostic and Inverventional Radiology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
  29. Ziga Snoj: Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  30. Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli: Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
  31. Federica Vernuccio: Section of Radiology, Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
  32. João Vieira: Radiology, Hospital Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.
  33. Ana Catarina Vieira: Radiology Department, Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  34. Mirjam Wielema: Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  35. Marta Zerunian: Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  36. Carmelo Messina: IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To collect real-world data about the knowledge and self-perception of young radiologists concerning the use of contrast media (CM) and the management of adverse drug reactions (ADR).
METHODS: A survey (29 questions) was distributed to residents and board-certified radiologists younger than 40 years to investigate the current international situation in young radiology community regarding CM and ADRs. Descriptive statistics analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Out of 454 respondents from 48 countries (mean age: 31.7 ± 4 years, range 25-39), 271 (59.7%) were radiology residents and 183 (40.3%) were board-certified radiologists. The majority (349, 76.5%) felt they were adequately informed regarding the use of CM. However, only 141 (31.1%) received specific training on the use of CM and 82 (18.1%) about management ADR during their residency. Although 266 (58.6%) knew safety protocols for handling ADR, 69.6% (316) lacked confidence in their ability to manage CM-induced ADRs and 95.8% (435) expressed a desire to enhance their understanding of CM use and handling of CM-induced ADRs. Nearly 300 respondents (297; 65.4%) were aware of the benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, but 249 (54.8%) of participants did not perform it. The preferred CM injection strategy in CT parenchymal examination and CT angiography examination was based on patient's lean body weight in 318 (70.0%) and 160 (35.2%), a predeterminate fixed amount in 79 (17.4%) and 116 (25.6%), iodine delivery rate in 26 (5.7%) and 122 (26.9%), and scan time in 31 (6.8%) and 56 (12.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Training in CM use and management ADR should be implemented in the training of radiology residents.
CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We highlight the need for improvement in the education of young radiologists regarding contrast media; more attention from residency programs and scientific societies should be focused on training about contrast media use and the management of adverse drug reactions.
KEY POINTS: • This survey investigated training of young radiologists about use of contrast media and management adverse reactions. • Most young radiologists claimed they did not receive dedicated training. • An extreme heterogeneity of responses was observed about contrast media indications/contraindications and injection strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):341-349 [PMID: 35852428]
  2. Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61 [PMID: 20574084]
  3. Clin Rheumatol. 2017 May;36(5):977-980 [PMID: 28321569]
  4. Radiology. 2009 Jun;251(3):691-6 [PMID: 19474374]
  5. Invest Radiol. 2019 Sep;54(9):589-599 [PMID: 30998567]
  6. Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6635-6644 [PMID: 32661585]
  7. Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):119-28 [PMID: 23319662]
  8. Insights Imaging. 2021 Sep 9;12(1):126 [PMID: 34499287]
  9. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 24;85(7):3347-3352 [PMID: 37427172]
  10. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Apr;9(4):552-564 [PMID: 31143647]
  11. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3096-101 [PMID: 22683195]
  12. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;55(2):413-421 [PMID: 28126223]
  13. Radiol Med. 2021 Feb;126(2):299-305 [PMID: 32572763]
  14. Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1738-50 [PMID: 26466182]
  15. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Nov;48(12):1688-1694 [PMID: 30242426]
  16. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 13;2018:8521893 [PMID: 30186869]
  17. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jul;49(7):728-730 [PMID: 28506472]
  18. Radiol Med. 2018 Apr;123(4):314-321 [PMID: 29249079]
  19. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020 Jun;24(3):323-330 [PMID: 32987429]
  20. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2356-2368 [PMID: 29318428]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0useradiologistsCMyoungcontrastmediamanagementtrainingadverseADRdrugreactionssurveyresidentsradiologyregardingADRs316%8%board-certifiedinternationalrespondents7%3%1%residencyhandlingmanageCM-induced4%injectionstrategyCTexamination26TrainingOBJECTIVES:collectreal-worlddataknowledgeself-perceptionconcerningMETHODS:29questionsdistributedyounger40 yearsinvestigatecurrentsituationcommunityDescriptivestatisticsanalysisperformedRESULTS:45448countriesmeanage:7 ± 4 yearsrange25-392715918340majority349765%feltadequatelyinformedHowever141receivedspecific8218Although26658knewsafetyprotocols69316lackedconfidenceability95435expresseddesireenhanceunderstandingNearly30029765awarebenefitscontrast-enhancedultrasound24954participantsperformpreferredparenchymalangiographybasedpatient'sleanbodyweight318700%160352%predeterminatefixedamount791711625iodinedeliveryrate51229%scantime65612respectivelyCONCLUSION:implementedCRITICALRELEVANCESTATEMENT:highlightneedimprovementeducationattentionprogramsscientificsocietiesfocusedKEYPOINTS:investigatedclaimedreceivededicatedextremeheterogeneityresponsesobservedindications/contraindicationsreactions:AdversereactionContrastmediumEducationSafety

Similar Articles

Cited By