Exploring the relationship across autonomous motivation, affects, and anxiety among gym practitioners during the second COVID-19 lockdown.

Raúl Antunes, Filipe Rodrigues, Miguel Jacinto, Nuno Amaro, Rui Matos, Diogo Monteiro
Author Information
  1. Raúl Antunes: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
  2. Filipe Rodrigues: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
  3. Miguel Jacinto: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal. miguel.s.jacinto@ipleiria.pt.
  4. Nuno Amaro: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
  5. Rui Matos: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
  6. Diogo Monteiro: ESECS - Polytechnic University of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

Abstract

The present study explores the association of autonomous motivation and the relationship of positive and negative affect on anxiety levels among individuals engaged in gym practitioners during the second COVID-19 lockdown. A total of 196 exercisers (29.17 ± 10.77) were enrolled in the present study, of which 112 (57.1%) were women and 84 (42.9%) were men. The survey included sociodemographic data, as well as validated instruments measuring autonomous motivation, positive and negative affect, and anxiety states related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The results revealed a positive association between autonomous motivation and positive affect (β = 0.36, CI 0.12, 0.37; p < 0.001), and a negative association between autonomous motivation and negative affect (β = - 0.17, CI - 0.31, - 0.01; p = 0.03). Moreover positive, and negative affect are negatively (β = - 0.33, CI - 0.43, - 0.24; p < 0.001) and positively (β = 0.72, CI 0.57, 0.82; p < 0.001) associated to anxiety, respectively. Thus, this study appears to emphasize the association of autonomous motivation on affect as a potential buffer against anxiety levels, particularly in a context where practitioners found themselves restricted in their usual gym practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 17;11:610882 [PMID: 33391128]
  2. Psychol Methods. 2004 Sep;9(3):275-300 [PMID: 15355150]
  3. Am Psychol. 2000 Jun;55(6):647-54 [PMID: 10892207]
  4. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  5. J Phys Act Health. 2023 Jul 28;20(10):963-970 [PMID: 37507118]
  6. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 06;12:716528 [PMID: 34421767]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3): [PMID: 36767746]
  8. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:545-552 [PMID: 27802893]
  9. Struct Equ Modeling. 2008;15(1):23-51 [PMID: 20179778]
  10. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12): [PMID: 32570737]
  11. Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 29;12:714865 [PMID: 34393954]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8): [PMID: 35457555]
  13. J Sport Health Sci. 2020 Mar;9(2):103-104 [PMID: 32099716]
  14. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):81-121 [PMID: 24030837]
  15. J Res Adolesc. 2021 Sep;31(3):500-516 [PMID: 34448307]
  16. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Aug;109(3):504-11 [PMID: 11016119]
  17. Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 11;9:1940 [PMID: 30364299]
  18. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 [PMID: 3397865]
  19. Psychol Rep. 2023 Dec;126(6):2669-2689 [PMID: 35503814]
  20. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 May 20;12:67 [PMID: 25990492]
  21. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):381 [PMID: 34320943]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;19(20): [PMID: 36294184]
  23. Behav Ther. 2017 Nov;48(6):820-833 [PMID: 29029678]
  24. PLoS One. 2015 May 05;10(5):e0126399 [PMID: 25942449]
  25. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):565-601 [PMID: 25750803]
  26. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 22;9:78 [PMID: 22726453]
  27. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1395-411 [PMID: 15347531]
  28. Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934 [PMID: 32229390]
  29. J Sports Sci. 2010 Aug;28(10):1065-76 [PMID: 20686994]
  30. Psychol Bull. 1984 Nov;96(3):465-90 [PMID: 6393179]
  31. J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Aug;74:102264 [PMID: 32623281]
  32. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112954 [PMID: 32325383]
  33. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 23;16:1009540 [PMID: 36211122]
  34. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113138 [PMID: 32562931]
  35. Sleep Med. 2021 Jan;77:297-301 [PMID: 33020037]
  36. Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Sep 09;4:954086 [PMID: 36157905]
  37. J Health Psychol. 2021 Mar;26(3):401-411 [PMID: 30565495]
  38. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):376 [PMID: 32677926]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Female
Motivation
COVID-19
Pandemics
Communicable Disease Control
Anxiety
Exercise

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0autonomousmotivationaffectpositivenegativeanxietyassociationCOVID-19CI0- 0studygympractitionersp < 0001presentrelationshiplevelsamongsecondlockdown57β = 0β = - 0exploresindividualsengagedtotal196exercisers2917 ± 1077enrolled1121%women84429%mensurveyincludedsociodemographicdatawellvalidatedinstrumentsmeasuringstatesrelatedpandemicresultsrevealed361237173101p = 003Moreovernegatively334324positively7282associatedrespectivelyThusappearsemphasizepotentialbufferparticularlycontextfoundrestrictedusualpracticesExploringacrossaffectsFitnessMentalhealthMotivation

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)