A multi-country mixed-method study identifying the association between perceived ethical work climate and problems among critical care nurses.

Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Farha Hisham Hijji, Ghadeer Al Dweik, Mohammad Alkawaldeh, Muhammad Arsyad Subu, Jacqueline Maria Dias, Mohannad Eid Aburuz, Sally Mohammed Farghaly
Author Information
  1. Fatma Refaat Ahmed: Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
  2. Nabeel Al-Yateem: Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
  3. Farha Hisham Hijji: Nurse Consultant, Emirates Health Services, Sharjah, UAE.
  4. Ghadeer Al Dweik: Clinical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
  5. Mohammad Alkawaldeh: Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
  6. Muhammad Arsyad Subu: Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
  7. Jacqueline Maria Dias: Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
  8. Mohannad Eid Aburuz: Clinical Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan. m_aburuz@asu.edu.jo. ORCID
  9. Sally Mohammed Farghaly: Nursing Management and Education Department, College of Nursing, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the grave ethical tension and dilemmas posed continuously which are aggravated in the intensive care unit context and its related caregiving provision, combined with their impact on critical care nurses' job satisfaction and work-related risks, exploring and analyzing these tensions and conflicts is crucial. This study was conducted to examine the relationship between perceived ethical work climate and problems among critical care nurses in addition to exploring their perspectives on the ethical work climates while caring for patients with infectious diseases.
DESIGN AND METHOD: A mixed-method research design was used to conduct this study among 635 participants, comprising 170 from Egypt, 144 from Jordan, 161 from Saudi Arabia, and 160 from the United Arab Emirates. Online or paper-based survey forms were distributed to all eligible critical care nurses who agreed to take part in the study. The survey contained both quantitative and qualitative data that were analyzed separately and integrated during the discussion. The study was reported following the STROBE guidelines.
FINDINGS: The overall ethical work climate was fairly good and was significantly associated with ICU nurses' personal and professional characteristics. The findings also identified three main themes: (1) an ethical sense of failure, (2) environmental condemnation, and (3) an instant action plan for resolving ethical conflicts.
CONCLUSIONS: ICU nurses perceived that ICU ethical climate was fairly good. The results indicated that ICU nurses generally had a relatively fair perception of the ethical work climate, with implications for addressing ethical issues and conflicts in various settings.
IMPACT: Mentorship and/or close supervision concerning ethical resilience, consultation, and decision-making is crucial in the ICU milieu. Metacognitive strategies to reinforce problem-solving and decision-making ICU nurses' skills could help them overcome the different ethical challenges. Adequate resources, teamwork, and organizational support are promising tactics to improve ICU nurses' ethical skills.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0269034 [PMID: 35862376]
  2. J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Apr;30(4):495-501 [PMID: 25829820]
  3. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021 May 12;8(3):310-317 [PMID: 34307780]
  4. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019 Feb 11;12:107-115 [PMID: 30804690]
  5. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 27;20(1):27 [PMID: 31029121]
  6. Nurs Ethics. 2019 Jun;26(4):1211-1225 [PMID: 29117776]
  7. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 17;22(1):73 [PMID: 34139997]
  8. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jan;46(1):46-56 [PMID: 31690968]
  9. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 27;22(1):144 [PMID: 34706723]
  10. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):120 [PMID: 29454350]
  11. Nurs Ethics. 2022 Aug;29(5):1174-1185 [PMID: 35545250]
  12. J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;29(1):117-125 [PMID: 35856486]
  13. Nurs Ethics. 2018 May;25(3):335-345 [PMID: 27216828]
  14. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;26(2):142-50 [PMID: 25898882]
  15. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Sep;13(5):418-22 [PMID: 23415959]
  16. BMC Nurs. 2019 Aug 29;18:39 [PMID: 31485197]
  17. Prof Inferm. 2019 Apr-Jun;72(2):129-134 [PMID: 31550429]
  18. Nurs Ethics. 2022 Jun;29(4):819-832 [PMID: 35085049]
  19. Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):9-22 [PMID: 33000673]
  20. J Nurs Manag. 2022 Oct;30(7):2403-2415 [PMID: 36064194]
  21. Nurs Ethics. 2014 Feb;21(1):28-42 [PMID: 23793070]
  22. Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2427-2437 [PMID: 30134760]
  23. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):84 [PMID: 32556826]
  24. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Mar;29(2):109-112 [PMID: 32100891]
  25. Breathe (Sheff). 2019 Mar;15(1):84-87 [PMID: 30838066]
  26. Nurs Ethics. 2019 Mar;26(2):346-356 [PMID: 28718349]
  27. Health SA. 2020 Apr 16;25:1183 [PMID: 32391174]
  28. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jun 05;7(3):313-319 [PMID: 32817854]
  29. Hum Resour Health. 2020 Dec 4;18(1):98 [PMID: 33276794]
  30. Iran J Public Health. 2018 Jun;47(6):875-883 [PMID: 30087874]
  31. Invest Educ Enferm. 2020 Oct;38(3): [PMID: 33306902]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ethicalICUclimatecarestudyworknursescriticalnurses'conflictsperceivedproblemsamongexploringcrucialdiseasesmixed-methodsurveyfairlygooddecision-makingskillsEthicalBACKGROUND:Givengravetensiondilemmasposedcontinuouslyaggravatedintensiveunitcontextrelatedcaregivingprovisioncombinedimpactjobsatisfactionwork-relatedrisksanalyzingtensionsconductedexaminerelationshipadditionperspectivesclimatescaringpatientsinfectiousDESIGNANDMETHOD:researchdesignusedconduct635participantscomprising170Egypt144Jordan161SaudiArabia160UnitedArabEmiratesOnlinepaper-basedformsdistributedeligibleagreedtakepartcontainedquantitativequalitativedataanalyzedseparatelyintegrateddiscussionreportedfollowingSTROBEguidelinesFINDINGS:overallsignificantlyassociatedpersonalprofessionalcharacteristicsfindingsalsoidentifiedthreemainthemes:1sensefailure2environmentalcondemnation3instantactionplanresolvingCONCLUSIONS:resultsindicatedgenerallyrelativelyfairperceptionimplicationsaddressingissuesvarioussettingsIMPACT:Mentorshipand/orclosesupervisionconcerningresilienceconsultationmilieuMetacognitivestrategiesreinforceproblem-solvinghelpovercomedifferentchallengesAdequateresourcesteamworkorganizationalsupportpromisingtacticsimproveTRIALREGISTRATION:applicablemulti-countryidentifyingassociationICUsInfectiousNurses

Similar Articles

Cited By