Breaking the Taboo: Understanding the Relationship between Perception, Beliefs, Willingness to Eat Insects, and Food Neophobia among Polish Adults.

Julita Szlachciuk, Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans
Author Information
  1. Julita Szlachciuk: Department of Food Market and Consumer Research, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID
  2. Sylwia Żakowska-Biemans: Department of Food Market and Consumer Research, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. ORCID

Abstract

Insects are a potential source of protein for direct human consumption or indirectly in processed foods. The research examined consumer perceptions and beliefs regarding the consumption of insects and food products containing insect proteins. The study aimed to identify beliefs about insect consumption, assess the perception of food products containing added insect proteins, and gain a deeper understanding of the role of food neophobia in accepting insects as an alternative source of protein. The data were collected in 2023 through a cross-sectional quantitative online survey of a group that was representative of consumers by age, gender, and region sample ( = 1000) who were responsible for food purchasing decisions in their households. While many respondents viewed foods enriched with insect protein as innovative and environmentally friendly, others found the idea of consuming insects repulsive and expressed concerns about potential allergic reactions. Food neophobia was a determining factor in respondents' beliefs and perceptions regarding the consumption of insects and food products containing insect proteins. Respondents were more inclined to consume products with added insect protein rather than visibly identifiable insects. The results highlight the need for targeted marketing strategies and product development approaches to align with the varied expectations of consumers in the rapidly expanding insect-based food market.

Keywords

References

  1. Appetite. 2014 Feb;73:140-6 [PMID: 24231427]
  2. Foods. 2023 Nov 20;12(22): [PMID: 38002231]
  3. Foods. 2023 Nov 24;12(23): [PMID: 38231647]
  4. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0224059 [PMID: 32352963]
  5. Foods. 2021 May 10;10(5): [PMID: 34068654]
  6. Foods. 2019 Aug 17;8(8): [PMID: 31426524]
  7. Foods. 2022 Nov 15;11(22): [PMID: 36429235]
  8. Foods. 2021 Oct 11;10(10): [PMID: 34681453]
  9. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021 May 30;21(5):35 [PMID: 34056688]
  10. Appetite. 1992 Oct;19(2):105-20 [PMID: 1489209]
  11. Mol Immunol. 2018 Aug;100:82-106 [PMID: 29731166]
  12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23): [PMID: 36497830]
  13. Food Res Int. 2019 Aug;122:661-678 [PMID: 31229126]
  14. Food Res Int. 2017 Feb;92:95-105 [PMID: 28290303]
  15. Appetite. 2023 Aug 1;187:106594 [PMID: 37178930]
  16. Foods. 2019 Mar 12;8(3): [PMID: 30871008]
  17. Food Res Int. 2019 Nov;125:108573 [PMID: 31554134]
  18. Waste Manag. 2020 Dec;118:600-609 [PMID: 33010691]
  19. Foods. 2022 Feb 03;11(3): [PMID: 35159605]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodinsectsinsectproteinconsumptionbeliefsproductscontainingproteinsneophobiaInsectspotentialsourcefoodsperceptionsregardingaddedalternativeconsumersFooddirecthumanindirectlyprocessedresearchexaminedconsumerstudyaimedidentifyassessperceptiongaindeeperunderstandingroleacceptingdatacollected2023cross-sectionalquantitativeonlinesurveygrouprepresentativeagegenderregionsample=1000responsiblepurchasingdecisionshouseholdsmanyrespondentsviewedenrichedinnovativeenvironmentallyfriendlyothersfoundideaconsumingrepulsiveexpressedconcernsallergicreactionsdeterminingfactorrespondents'Respondentsinclinedconsumerathervisiblyidentifiableresultshighlightneedtargetedmarketingstrategiesproductdevelopmentapproachesalignvariedexpectationsrapidlyexpandinginsect-basedmarketBreakingTaboo:UnderstandingRelationshipPerceptionBeliefsWillingnessEatNeophobiaamongPolishAdultssourcesnovel

Similar Articles

Cited By