Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Saima Taj, Ravi Chandavarkar, Raghavan Vidya
Author Information
  1. Saima Taj: The Royal Wolverhampton N.H.S. Trust, Wolverhampton Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
  2. Ravi Chandavarkar: The Royal Wolverhampton N.H.S. Trust, Wolverhampton Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
  3. Raghavan Vidya: The Royal Wolverhampton N.H.S. Trust, Wolverhampton Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.

Abstract

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most frequently performed procedure for breast reconstruction following mastectomy, which involves the surgical placement of breast implants. The approach to breast reconstruction can be divided into two main categories, namely prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) and subpectoral breast reconstruction (SPBR), based on the implant plan and placement technique. In recent years, there has been a significant surge in the popularity of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, where the implants are positioned above the chest muscle, as opposed to beneath it in the subpectoral approach. However, despite this growing preference, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the national trends in the utilization of this technique, thus necessitating further investigation. This narrative review aims to ascertain the current global patterns linked to prepectoral breast reconstruction and elucidate the considerations surrounding patient and implant selection, reconstructive techniques, the utilization of meshes in prepectoral reconstruction, the ensuing outcomes and complications, the ramifications of radiotherapy, and the potential advantages of integrating fat infiltration into the implementation of this technique in breast reconstruction with a focus on published papers in last five years. Conclusion: Prepectoral breast reconstruction has emerged as an appropriate surgical option for individuals seeking breast reconstruction. This development can be attributed to the recent progress made in implant technology, which has significantly enhanced the outcomes of this procedure. Additionally, advancements in mastectomy techniques, autologous fat grafting, and the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have also played a vital role in improving the aesthetic results of prepectoral breast reconstruction. As a result, the significance and effectiveness of this technique in the field of breast reconstruction have been firmly established, making it an essential component of the overall armamentarium available to plastic surgeons for breast reconstruction purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 26;8(5):e2659 [PMID: 33133881]
  2. J Clin Med. 2022 May 30;11(11): [PMID: 35683465]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jul 06;: [PMID: 37410610]
  4. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jul 23;8(7):e2966 [PMID: 32802660]
  5. Clin Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;50(2):243-248 [PMID: 36813402]
  6. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019 Aug 26;36(3):201-207 [PMID: 31620634]
  7. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Jul 08;3(6):e412 [PMID: 26180713]
  8. Clin Anat. 2017 May;30(4):434-435 [PMID: 28318062]
  9. J Orthop Res. 2019 Jul;37(7):1610-1619 [PMID: 30816589]
  10. Semin Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;33(4):236-239 [PMID: 31632206]
  11. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):36-42 [PMID: 30842926]
  12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Sep 22;: [PMID: 37737875]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e574 [PMID: 26893999]
  14. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Oct;70(10):1329-1335 [PMID: 28743588]
  15. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):1-2 [PMID: 30842921]
  16. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1189-1200 [PMID: 34981157]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 1;34(4):314-20 [PMID: 26598752]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Aug 10;9(8):e3745 [PMID: 34386310]
  19. Gland Surg. 2016 Apr;5(2):158-73 [PMID: 27047784]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S [PMID: 29064922]
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):305-315 [PMID: 33177453]
  22. Surgeon. 2020 Aug;18(4):202-207 [PMID: 31636037]
  23. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Aug;130(2):282-292 [PMID: 22842406]
  24. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Apr;23(3):249-254 [PMID: 36725477]
  25. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(4):NP45-NP54 [PMID: 30358820]
  26. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Feb;135(2):445e [PMID: 25626830]
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 23;7(5):e2108 [PMID: 31333922]
  28. BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1): [PMID: 33609398]
  29. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021 May;29(2):81-87 [PMID: 34026670]
  30. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):743e-748e [PMID: 33890886]
  31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;28(7):841-846 [PMID: 36848021]
  32. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e050886 [PMID: 34848516]
  33. J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 19;12(9): [PMID: 36143318]
  34. J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 01;12(10): [PMID: 36294758]
  35. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Nov;86:94-108 [PMID: 37716255]
  36. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Aug 8;5(8):e1439 [PMID: 28894660]
  37. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jun 06;: [PMID: 37285211]
  38. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):174-175 [PMID: 30639094]
  39. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Sep;55(3):232-9 [PMID: 16106158]
  40. Gland Surg. 2018 Aug;7(Suppl 1):S64-S69 [PMID: 30175066]
  41. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Apr 23;8(4):e2744 [PMID: 32440414]
  42. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):8e-19e [PMID: 23806958]
  43. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Apr 18;19:361-368 [PMID: 37095832]
  44. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019 May 07;13:927 [PMID: 31281424]
  45. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):67-74 [PMID: 30842930]
  46. Gland Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):411-416 [PMID: 33633999]
  47. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb;139(2):287-294 [PMID: 28121858]
  48. Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Jun 1;90(6S Suppl 5):S466-S471 [PMID: 36880719]
  49. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):52-61 [PMID: 27776942]
  50. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 22;4:CD013280 [PMID: 32320056]
  51. Eur J Plast Surg. 2017;40(5):447-454 [PMID: 28989237]
  52. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1245-1257 [PMID: 36542092]
  53. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 12;11(6):e5058 [PMID: 37313479]
  54. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):761-769 [PMID: 27673513]
  55. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jun 20;5(6):e1369 [PMID: 28740781]
  56. Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;83(4S Suppl 1):S59-S64 [PMID: 31513068]
  57. Gland Surg. 2015 Jun;4(3):222-31 [PMID: 26161307]
  58. Breast J. 2016 May;22(3):274-81 [PMID: 26899399]
  59. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35 [PMID: 24656685]
  60. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):600-10 [PMID: 26438439]
  61. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Oct;23(7):704-711 [PMID: 37479666]
  62. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):81-91 [PMID: 35879475]
  63. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):511-518 [PMID: 23676964]
  64. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 26;9(10):e3825 [PMID: 34712539]
  65. Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):534-541 [PMID: 34043774]
  66. Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Dec 1;89(6):694-702 [PMID: 36416706]
  67. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov 05;9(11):e3910 [PMID: 34765389]
  68. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1146-52 [PMID: 24114295]
  69. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):11-18 [PMID: 30842923]
  70. ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jun;87(6):493-498 [PMID: 25266930]
  71. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jan 07;3(12):e577 [PMID: 26894002]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Mastectomy
Breast Neoplasms
Pectoralis Muscles
Mammaplasty
Breast Implantation
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0breastreconstructionprepectoraltechniquemastectomyimplantfatproceduresurgicalplacementimplantsapproachcansubpectoralrecentyearsimplant-basedutilizationtechniquesoutcomescomplicationsradiotherapyPrepectoralgraftingacellulardermalImplant-basedIBBRfrequentlyperformedfollowinginvolvesdividedtwomaincategoriesnamelyPPBRSPBRbasedplansignificantsurgepopularitypositionedchestmuscleopposedbeneathHoweverdespitegrowingpreferencelackcomprehensivedataregardingnationaltrendsthusnecessitatinginvestigationnarrativereviewaimsascertaincurrentglobalpatternslinkedelucidateconsiderationssurroundingpatientselectionreconstructivemeshesensuingramificationspotentialadvantagesintegratinginfiltrationimplementationfocuspublishedpaperslastfiveConclusion:emergedappropriateoptionindividualsseekingdevelopmentattributedprogressmadetechnologysignificantlyenhancedAdditionallyadvancementsautologoususematricesADMsalsoplayedvitalroleimprovingaestheticresultsresultsignificanceeffectivenessfieldfirmlyestablishedmakingessentialcomponentoverallarmamentariumavailableplasticsurgeonspurposesCurrentGlobalTrendsBreastReconstructionmatrixsyntheticmesh

Similar Articles

Cited By