Neural substrates of L2-L1 transfer effects on phonological awareness in young Chinese-English bilingual children.

Jia-Wei Kou, Li-Ying Fan, Hsin-Chin Chen, Shiou-Yuan Chen, Xiaosu Hu, Kehui Zhang, Ioulia Kovelman, Tai-Li Chou
Author Information
  1. Jia-Wei Kou: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  2. Li-Ying Fan: Department of Education, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.
  3. Hsin-Chin Chen: Department of Psychology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
  4. Shiou-Yuan Chen: Department of Early Childhood Education, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan.
  5. Xiaosu Hu: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  6. Kehui Zhang: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  7. Ioulia Kovelman: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  8. Tai-Li Chou: Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: tlchou25@ntu.edu.tw.

Abstract

The growing trend of bilingual education between Chinese and English has contributed to a rise in the number of early bilingual children, who were exposed to L2 prior to formal language instruction of L1. The L2-L1 transfer effect in an L1-dominant environment has been well established. However, the threshold of L2 proficiency at which such transfer manifests remains unclear. This study investigated the behavioral and neural processes involved when manipulating phonemes in an auditory phonological task to uncover the transfer effect in young bilingual children. Sixty-two first graders from elementary schools in Taiwan were recruited in this study (29 Chinese monolinguals, 33 Chinese-English bilinguals). The brain activity was measured using fNIRS (functional near-infrared spectroscopy). Bilingual children showed right lateralization to process Chinese and left lateralization to process English, which supports more on the accommodation effect within the framework of the assimilation-accommodation hypothesis. Also, compared to monolinguals, bilingual children showed more bilateral frontal activation in Chinese, potentially reflecting a mixed influence from L2-L1 transfer effects and increased cognitive load of bilingual exposure. These results elucidate the developmental adjustments in the neural substrates associated with early bilingual exposure in phonological processing, offering valuable insights into the bilingual learning process.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Nov;27(11):915-24 [PMID: 16575838]
  2. Neuroimage. 2002 May;16(1):7-22 [PMID: 11969313]
  3. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 18;12:781304 [PMID: 34867693]
  4. Elife. 2021 Sep 27;10: [PMID: 34569931]
  5. Elife. 2020 Oct 29;9: [PMID: 33118931]
  6. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 May;17(5):323-32 [PMID: 27040907]
  7. Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 15;110:3-10 [PMID: 25598049]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):91-6 [PMID: 10607401]
  9. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;59(1):76-87 [PMID: 28691732]
  10. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Sep;16(7):1234-49 [PMID: 15453976]
  11. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Aug 1;42(11):3534-3546 [PMID: 33951259]
  12. Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91 [PMID: 22759996]
  13. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):920-33 [PMID: 19020511]
  14. Brain Lang. 2019 Dec;199:104696 [PMID: 31655417]
  15. Cognition. 2016 May;150:119-32 [PMID: 26896725]
  16. Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1694-706 [PMID: 20488886]
  17. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):2047-2063 [PMID: 29380469]
  18. Brain Lang. 2019 Feb;189:10-19 [PMID: 30593860]
  19. Child Dev. 2022 Jan;93(1):84-100 [PMID: 34570366]
  20. Ann Dyslexia. 2022 Jul;72(2):361-383 [PMID: 34255265]
  21. Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:126-134 [PMID: 27377221]
  22. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Apr;16(4):234-44 [PMID: 25783611]
  23. Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):750-9 [PMID: 20884355]
  24. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Oct 1;52(7):679-93 [PMID: 12372658]
  25. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;14:611008 [PMID: 33536890]
  26. Neuroreport. 2015 Nov 11;26(16):966-71 [PMID: 26351964]
  27. Biling (Camb Engl). 2008 Jul 1;11(2):203-223 [PMID: 19823598]
  28. Cortex. 2007 Jul;43(5):635-50 [PMID: 17715798]
  29. Brain. 1965 Jun;88(2):221-36 [PMID: 5828904]
  30. Brain Res Bull. 2002 Oct 30;59(2):83-95 [PMID: 12379438]
  31. Neuroimage. 2008 Jul 15;41(4):1484-92 [PMID: 18479941]
  32. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):892-902 [PMID: 21705392]
  33. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):92-104 [PMID: 15846818]
  34. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):242-59 [PMID: 20980019]
  35. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 16;8:729 [PMID: 25278863]
  36. Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 15;29(4):1141-9 [PMID: 16275017]
  37. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;1(3):338-50 [PMID: 22337757]
  38. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):754-64 [PMID: 21693783]
  39. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 29;12:673761 [PMID: 34658998]
  40. Autism Res. 2016 Dec;9(12):1263-1273 [PMID: 26899269]
  41. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Dec;34(12):3354-68 [PMID: 22815229]
  42. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:173-96 [PMID: 25251488]
  43. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jan;33(1):235-45 [PMID: 21391265]
  44. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 20;3:27 [PMID: 19949458]
  45. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):1998-2012 [PMID: 20807053]
  46. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Sep;28(9):880-91 [PMID: 17133384]
  47. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Apr;1369(1):111-31 [PMID: 26766393]
  48. Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 12;16:984328 [PMID: 36312011]
  49. Brain. 2013 Dec;136(Pt 12):3696-708 [PMID: 24052613]
  50. Brain Lang. 1999 Dec;70(3):347-63 [PMID: 10600225]
  51. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jun;35(6):2607-18 [PMID: 24105858]
  52. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(9):1199-207 [PMID: 12753959]
  53. Neurosci Res. 2001 Aug;40(4):351-8 [PMID: 11463481]
  54. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2019;22(2):207-223 [PMID: 30713464]
  55. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 May;36(5):1963-81 [PMID: 25628041]
  56. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Feb 9;65(2):450-468 [PMID: 35021020]
  57. Brain Lang. 2016 Aug;159:60-73 [PMID: 27295606]
  58. Algorithms. 2018 May;11(5): [PMID: 38957522]
  59. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Jun;112(2):111-26 [PMID: 22382048]
  60. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Oct;92(2):140-60 [PMID: 15904930]
  61. Brain Connect. 2020 Jun;10(5):212-223 [PMID: 32308014]
  62. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Nov;39(11):4334-4348 [PMID: 29956400]
  63. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47 [PMID: 12428705]
  64. Biomed Opt Express. 2013 Jul 17;4(8):1366-79 [PMID: 24009999]
  65. Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):399-403 [PMID: 19833961]
  66. Dev Sci. 2015 Jan;18(1):119-131 [PMID: 24962559]
  67. Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Sep;44(13):4812-4829 [PMID: 37483170]
  68. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):393-402 [PMID: 17431404]
  69. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Sep;43(13):4013-4029 [PMID: 35545935]
  70. Brain Lang. 2013 May;125(2):165-72 [PMID: 22434043]
  71. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Oct;198(4):465-75 [PMID: 19618170]
  72. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 17;9:417 [PMID: 26236223]
  73. Neuropsychologia. 2021 Apr 16;154:107796 [PMID: 33610615]
  74. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):810-20 [PMID: 18381767]
  75. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;73:25-34 [PMID: 25940099]

Grants

  1. R01 HD092498/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD111637/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child
Humans
Multilingualism
Linguistics
China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bilingualchildrentransferChineseL2-L1effectphonologicalprocessEnglishearlyL2studyneuralyoungmonolingualsChinese-EnglishfNIRSshowedlateralizationeffectsexposuresubstratesgrowingtrendeducationcontributedrisenumberexposedpriorformallanguageinstructionL1L1-dominantenvironmentwellestablishedHoweverthresholdproficiencymanifestsremainsunclearinvestigatedbehavioralprocessesinvolvedmanipulatingphonemesauditorytaskuncoverSixty-twofirstgraderselementaryschoolsTaiwanrecruited2933bilingualsbrainactivitymeasuredusingfunctionalnear-infraredspectroscopyBilingualrightleftsupportsaccommodationwithinframeworkassimilation-accommodationhypothesisAlsocomparedbilateralfrontalactivationpotentiallyreflectingmixedinfluenceincreasedcognitiveloadresultselucidatedevelopmentaladjustmentsassociatedprocessingofferingvaluableinsightslearningNeuralawarenessBilingualismDevelopmentLearningPhonology

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)