Influence of PhoPQ and PmrAB two component system alternations on colistin resistance from non-mcr colistin resistant clinical E. Coli strains.

Ching-Hsun Wang, L Kristopher Siu, Feng-Yee Chang, Yu-Kuo Tsai, Li-Yueh Huang, Jung-Chung Lin
Author Information
  1. Ching-Hsun Wang: Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Section 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
  2. L Kristopher Siu: Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  3. Feng-Yee Chang: Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Section 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
  4. Yu-Kuo Tsai: Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  5. Li-Yueh Huang: Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  6. Jung-Chung Lin: Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Section 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan. linjungchung1@yahoo.com.tw.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current understanding of acquired chromosomal colistin resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales primarily involves the disruption of the upstream PmrAB and PhoPQ two-component system (TCS) control caused by mutations in the regulatory genes. Interestingly, previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the interaction of regulatory genes related to colistin resistance in Escherichia coli, specifically those surrounding PhoPQ and PmrAB TCS.
RESULTS: In our study, we focused on two clinical non-mcr colistin-resistant strains of E. coli, TSAREC02 and TSAREC03, to gain a better understanding of their resistance mechanisms. Upon analysis, we discovered that TSAREC02 had a deletion (Δ27-45) in MgrB, as well as substitutions (G206R, Y222H) in PmrB. On the other hand, TSAREC03 exhibited a long deletion (Δ84-224) in PhoP, along with substitutions (M1I, L14P, P178S, T235N) in PmrB. We employed recombinant DNA techniques to explore the interaction between the PhoPQ and PmrAB two-component systems (TCSs) and examine the impact of the mutated phoPQ and pmrB genes on the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin. We observed significant changes in the expression of the pmrD gene, which encodes a connector protein regulated by the PhoPQ TCS, in the TSAREC02 wild-type (WT)-mgrB replacement mutant and the TSAREC03 WT-phoP replacement mutant, compared to their respective parental strains. However, the expressions of pmrB/pmrA, which reflect PmrAB TCS activity, and the colistin MICs remained unchanged. In contrast, the colistin MICs and pmrB/pmrA expression levels were significantly reduced in the pmrB deletion mutants from both TSAREC02 and TSAREC03, compared to their parental strains. Moreover, we were able to restore colistin resistance and the expressions of pmrB/pmrA by transforming a plasmid containing the parental mutated pmrB back into the TSAREC02 and TSAREC03 mutants, respectively.
CONCLUSION: While additional data from clinical E. coli isolates are necessary to validate whether our findings could be broadly applied to the E. coli population, our study illuminates distinct regulatory pathway interactions involving colistin resistance in E. coli compared to other species of Enterobacterales. The added information provided by our study contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex pathway interactions within Enterobacterales.

Keywords

References

  1. Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0002221 [PMID: 34259551]
  2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Oct;58(10):5696-703 [PMID: 25022583]
  3. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022 Feb 9;46(1): [PMID: 34612488]
  4. J Biomed Sci. 2010 Jul 24;17:60 [PMID: 20653976]
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):2051-61 [PMID: 25605366]
  6. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 May 23;60(6):3709-16 [PMID: 27067316]
  7. EMBO J. 2000 Apr 17;19(8):1861-72 [PMID: 10775270]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 7;101(49):17162-7 [PMID: 15569938]
  9. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Jun;21:386-390 [PMID: 31838239]
  10. Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 17;8:2262 [PMID: 29250039]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct 12;60(1):609-12 [PMID: 26459897]
  12. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  13. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Apr 24;12:965-975 [PMID: 31190901]
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Aug;58(8):4762-6 [PMID: 24914122]
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 May;59(5):2780-4 [PMID: 25733503]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 May 21;64(6): [PMID: 32284375]
  17. PLoS Genet. 2008 Oct;4(10):e1000233 [PMID: 18949034]
  18. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9): [PMID: 29914952]
  19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):400-410 [PMID: 28139430]
  20. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Oct 1;72(10):2729-2736 [PMID: 29091192]
  21. mSphere. 2020 Mar 11;5(2): [PMID: 32161146]
  22. J Bacteriol. 1993 Jul;175(13):4154-64 [PMID: 8391535]
  23. PLoS Genet. 2011 Jul;7(7):e1002184 [PMID: 21811415]
  24. Mol Microbiol. 2016 Oct;102(2):274-289 [PMID: 27381382]
  25. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5071 [PMID: 28698568]
  26. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e109258 [PMID: 25268958]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 12;114(50):E10792-E10798 [PMID: 29183977]
  28. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Dec;70(12):3402-4 [PMID: 26283671]

Grants

  1. TSGH-C107-100, TSGH-C108-138, TSGH-D-109128, and TSGH-D-110055/Tri-Service General Hospital
  2. MOST 112-2314-B-016-043/Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan

MeSH Term

Colistin
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Escherichia coli
Bacterial Proteins
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Chemicals

Colistin
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacterial Proteins