The use of medical health applications by primary care physicians in Israel: a cross-sectional study.

Menashe Meni Amran, Avital Bilitzky, Mattan Bar-Yishay, Limor Adler
Author Information
  1. Menashe Meni Amran: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Amran_m@mac.org.il.
  2. Avital Bilitzky: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  3. Mattan Bar-Yishay: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  4. Limor Adler: Department of Family Medicine, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of medical health applications (mHealth apps) by patients, caregivers, and physicians is widespread. mHealth apps are often employed by physicians to quickly access professional knowledge, guide treatment, easily retrieve medical records, and monitor and manage patients. This study sought to characterize the use of mHealth apps among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Israel. The reasons for using apps and barriers to their use were also investigated.
METHODS: From all MHS' PCPs, we randomly selected 700 PCPs and invited them to complete a questionnaire regarding the use of mHealth apps and attitudes toward them.
RESULTS: From August 2020 to December 2020, 191 physicians completed the questionnaire (response rate 27.3%). 68.0% of PCPs reported using mHealth apps. Telemedicine service apps were the most frequently used. Medical calculators (used for clinical scoring) and differential diagnosis apps were the least frequently used. The most common reason for mHealth app use was accessibility, followed by time saved and a sense of information reliability. Among infrequent users of apps, the most common barriers reported were unfamiliarity with relevant apps and preference for using a computer. Concerns regarding information reliability were rarely reported by PCPs. Physician gender and seniority were not related to mHealth app use. Physician age was related to the use of mHealth apps.
CONCLUSIONS: mHealth apps are widely used by PCPs in this study, regardless of physician gender or seniority. Information from mHealth apps is considered reliable by PCPs. The main barrier to app use is unfamiliarity with relevant apps and preference for computer use.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97 [PMID: 27185295]
  2. BMJ. 2017 Sep 1;358:j4099 [PMID: 28864596]
  3. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 17;6(1):e23 [PMID: 29343463]
  4. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Jul 21;6(2):e11 [PMID: 28733273]
  5. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Jun;11(3):499-503 [PMID: 32297266]
  6. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 08;19(5):e154 [PMID: 28483745]
  7. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935 [PMID: 32130167]
  8. Telemed J E Health. 2018 Jun;24(6):464-468 [PMID: 29173067]
  9. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:793-7 [PMID: 25991263]
  10. J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):290-6 [PMID: 26552716]
  11. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Oct 30;12:121 [PMID: 23110712]
  12. BMC Med. 2023 Mar 23;21(1):109 [PMID: 36959646]
  13. Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):1088-95 [PMID: 23821609]
  14. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):622-630.e3 [PMID: 27965005]
  15. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24(3):38-40 [PMID: 24261171]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;57(8):1145-54 [PMID: 23839999]
  17. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 21;5(12):e193 [PMID: 29269336]
  18. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 03;16(2):e32 [PMID: 24491911]
  19. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):88 [PMID: 31014333]
  20. Mhealth. 2018 Sep 30;4:44 [PMID: 30363764]
  21. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 24;4(2):e64 [PMID: 27220417]
  22. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 26;9(3):e19310 [PMID: 33769303]
  23. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 3;7(6):e13199 [PMID: 31199343]
  24. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Jun 1;10(1):34 [PMID: 34074319]
  25. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 15;14(1):125 [PMID: 28915825]
  26. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795 [PMID: 33661123]
  27. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:117-134 [PMID: 34910582]
  28. P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64 [PMID: 24883008]
  29. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 05;19(9):e300 [PMID: 28874336]
  30. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24;17(2):e52 [PMID: 25803266]
  31. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Nov 08;5(11):e165 [PMID: 29117934]
  32. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20 [PMID: 26078410]
  33. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Feb 11;13:23 [PMID: 23399513]
  34. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012 [PMID: 34817385]
  35. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Oct 16;3(4):e95 [PMID: 26474545]
  36. BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 24;2(4): [PMID: 22923627]

MeSH Term

Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
Israel
Mobile Applications
Physicians, Primary Care
Reproducibility of Results
Telemedicine
Random Allocation
Middle Eastern People

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0appsusemHealthPCPsphysiciansusedmedicalhealthapplicationsstudycareusingreportedapppatientsprimarybarriersquestionnaireregarding2020frequentlyMedicalcommoninformationreliabilityunfamiliarityrelevantpreferencecomputerPhysiciangenderseniorityrelatedBACKGROUND:caregiverswidespreadoftenemployedquicklyaccessprofessionalknowledgeguidetreatmenteasilyretrieverecordsmonitormanagesoughtcharacterizeamongIsraelreasonsalsoinvestigatedMETHODS:MHS'randomlyselected700invitedcompleteattitudestowardthemRESULTS:AugustDecember191completedresponserate273%680%TelemedicineservicecalculatorsclinicalscoringdifferentialdiagnosisleastreasonaccessibilityfollowedtimesavedsenseAmonginfrequentusersConcernsrarelyageCONCLUSIONS:widelyregardlessphysicianInformationconsideredreliablemainbarrierIsrael:cross-sectionalAttitudesPrimary

Similar Articles

Cited By