Using a novel hemostatic peptide solution to prevent bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastric tumor.

Kuniyo Gomi, Yorimasa Yamamoto, Erika Yoshida, Misako Tohata, Masatsugu Nagahama
Author Information
  1. Kuniyo Gomi: Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan. kunxaqua@med.showa-u.ac.jp.
  2. Yorimasa Yamamoto: Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.
  3. Erika Yoshida: Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.
  4. Misako Tohata: Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.
  5. Masatsugu Nagahama: Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Kanagawa, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal dissection has become the standard treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer occurs in 4.4% of patients. This study hypothesized whether applying PuraStat, a novel hemostatic peptide solution, prevents post-ESD bleeding.
AIM: To investigate the preventive potential of PuraStat, a hemostatic formulation, against bleeding in post-ESD gastric ulcers.
METHODS: Between May 2022 and March 2023, 101 patients (Group P) underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital and received PuraStat (2 mL) for post-ESD ulcers. We retrospectively compared this group with a control group (Group C) comprising 297 patients who underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital between April 2017 and March 2021. values < 0.05 on two-sided tests indicated significance.
RESULTS: Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 6 (5.9%) (95%CI: 2.8-12.4) and 20 (6.7%) (95%CI: 4.4-10.2) patients in Groups P and C, respectively, with no significant between-group difference. The relative risk was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.95-1.07). The lesser curvature or anterior wall was the bleeding site in all 6 patients who experienced postoperative bleeding in Group P. In multivariate analysis, the odds ratios for resection diameter ≥ 50 mm and oral anticoagulant use were 6.63 (95%CI: 2.52-14.47; = 0.0001) and 4.04 (1.26-0.69; = 0.0164), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of post-ESD bleeding and PuraStat was 1.28 (95%CI: 0.28-2.15).
CONCLUSION: PuraStat application is not associated with post-ESD bleeding. However, the study suggests that gravitational forces may affect the effectiveness of applied PuraStat.

Keywords

References

  1. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Apr;4(4):E415-9 [PMID: 27092320]
  2. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1259-64 [PMID: 26608126]
  3. Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):4-20 [PMID: 33107115]
  4. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jan;31(1):30-39 [PMID: 30058258]
  5. Endoscopy. 2021 Jan;53(1):27-35 [PMID: 32679602]
  6. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 1;118(2):276-283 [PMID: 36449784]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bleedingPuraStatgastricpatientshemostaticpost-ESD095%CI:dissection426submucosalESDpeptidesolutionGroupP1EndoscopiccancerHoweverstudynovelulcersMarchunderwentdiseaseshospitalgroupCrespectivelyodds=BACKGROUND:mucosalbecomestandardtreatmentearlypost-endoscopiculceroccurs4%hypothesizedwhetherapplyingpreventsAIM:investigatepreventivepotentialformulationMETHODS:May20222023101receivedmLretrospectivelycomparedcontrolcomprising297April20172021values<05two-sidedtestsindicatedsignificanceRESULTS:Post-ESDoccurred59%8-12207%4-10Groupssignificantbetween-groupdifferencerelativerisk0195-107lessercurvatureanteriorwallsiteexperiencedpostoperativemultivariateanalysisratiosresectiondiameter50mmoralanticoagulantuse6352-144700010426-0690164adjustedratio2828-215CONCLUSION:applicationassociatedsuggestsgravitationalforcesmayaffecteffectivenessappliedUsingpreventendoscopictumorBleedingGastricProtonpumpinhibitorforceps

Similar Articles

Cited By