OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Materials horizons
Jul 01, 2024;11 (13): 3005-3010.

Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions.

Nathanne Cristina Vilela Rost, Maha Said, Mustafa Gharib, Raphaël Lévy, Federico Boem
Author Information
  1. Nathanne Cristina Vilela Rost: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, LVTS, F-75018 Paris, France. ORCID
  2. Maha Said: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, LVTS, F-75018 Paris, France. ORCID
  3. Mustafa Gharib: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, LVTS, F-75018 Paris, France. ORCID
  4. Raphaël Lévy: Université Sorbonne Paris Nord and Université Paris Cité, INSERM, LVTS, F-75018 Paris, France. ORCID
  5. Federico Boem: University of Twente, Philosophy Section, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands. f.boem@utwente.nl. ORCID
PMID: 38578130 DOI: 10.1039/d3mh01781h

Abstract

We aim to foster a discussion of science correction and of how individual researchers can improve the quality and control of scientific production. This is crucial because although the maintenance of rigorous standards and the scrupulous control of research findings and methods are sometimes taken for granted, in practice, we are routinely confronted with articles that contain errors.

References

  1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;82(1): [PMID: 33999541]
  2. Account Res. 2023 Feb;30(2):77-87 [PMID: 34346793]
  3. Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2023 Feb;40(1):14-21 [PMID: 36793486]
  4. Trends Biotechnol. 2021 May;39(5):425-427 [PMID: 33568314]
  5. EMBO Rep. 2018 Oct;19(10): [PMID: 30158143]
  6. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Feb 13;30(1):6 [PMID: 38349578]
  7. PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 10;14(11):e2000995 [PMID: 27832072]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32 [PMID: 22508865]
  9. Trends Genet. 2015 May;31(5):221-3 [PMID: 25851694]
  10. ACS Nano. 2023 Jan 10;17(1):4-11 [PMID: 36573831]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66 [PMID: 22006061]
  12. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Mar;3(3):197 [PMID: 30953022]
  13. Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):25-7 [PMID: 26333454]
  14. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0255334 [PMID: 35235555]
  15. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018 Sep;13(9):777-785 [PMID: 30190620]
  16. ACS Nano. 2015 Oct 27;9(10):9427-8 [PMID: 26503193]
  17. Nature. 2016 May 11;533(7602):147 [PMID: 27172010]
  18. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Apr 03;6:20 [PMID: 22536180]
  19. Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):452-4 [PMID: 27225100]
  20. Elife. 2016 Dec 20;5: [PMID: 27995896]
  21. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020 Jan;15(1):2-3 [PMID: 31925392]
  22. EMBO Rep. 2020 Jan 7;21(1):e49775 [PMID: 31858691]
  23. PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 3;20(3):e3001572 [PMID: 35239642]
  24. ACS Nano. 2020 Jan 28;14(1):21-25 [PMID: 31934742]
  25. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030201 [PMID: 29180912]
  26. R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 24;9(8):220139 [PMID: 36039285]
  27. ACS Sens. 2022 Oct 28;7(10):3223-3224 [PMID: 36194452]
  28. J Am Chem Soc. 2022 Mar 23;144(11):4819-4827 [PMID: 35258973]
  29. Nature. 2016 Apr 21;532(7599):306-8 [PMID: 27111616]
  30. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26828 [PMID: 22073203]
  31. J R Soc Med. 2008 Oct;101(10):507-14 [PMID: 18840867]
  32. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Apr 30;5:6 [PMID: 32368354]
  33. Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1420-2 [PMID: 26113701]
Journal Article Review
Article has an altmetric score of 4

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0controlaimfosterdiscussionsciencecorrectionindividualresearcherscanimprovequalityscientificproductioncrucialalthoughmaintenancerigorousstandardsscrupulousresearchfindingsmethodssometimestakengrantedpracticeroutinelyconfrontedarticlescontainerrorsBetternanoscienceopencollaborativecriticaldiscussions

Similar Articles

Cited By